Skip to content
Back to skills

Create Pr

ASecurity

create a pull request with standardized description template

  • 79 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added May 27, 2026
developmentgobashtestinggitapidocumentation

Works with

  • claude code
  • cli
  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned May 27, 2026

npx -y skills add existential-birds/beagle --skill create-pr --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Create Pr?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Create Pr
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/existential-birds-create-pr/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/existential-birds-create-pr)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: create-pr
description: create a pull request with standardized description template
disable-model-invocation: true
---

# Create Pull Request

Create a pull request with a well-structured description based on the branch changes.

## Instructions

### Gates (run in order)

Do not draft or run `gh pr create` until each step passes.

1. **Branch gate:** `git branch --show-current` is not the default branch (`main`, `master`, or the repo’s documented default). **Pass:** branch name is printed and satisfies this.
2. **Evidence gate:** You have run the commands in [Gather Context](#1-gather-context) for the same `main..HEAD` (or `origin/main..HEAD` if local `main` is missing) range you will summarize. **Pass:** you can name at least one commit subject and one area of files changed without inventing details.
3. **Template gate:** The final PR title and body contain no unreplaced placeholders (`<...>`, `TODO`, `TBD`). Optional sections with no content are removed, not left as stubs. **Pass:** a quick scan finds no angle-bracket placeholders or filler tokens.
4. **Create gate:** `gh pr create` exits successfully and prints a PR URL (or the PR number/URL from `gh` output). **Pass:** URL (or id) is recorded; if the command fails, do not claim the PR was created.

### 1. Gather Context

First, collect information about the changes:

```bash
# Get current branch and verify it's not main
git branch --show-current

# Get commit history for this branch
git log --oneline main..HEAD

# Get detailed commit messages for context
git log --format="### %s%n%n%b" main..HEAD

# Get file change statistics
git diff --stat main..HEAD

# Get the actual diff for understanding changes
git diff main..HEAD
```

### 2. Analyze the Changes

Based on the gathered information, determine:

- **What changed**: Categorize changes (features, fixes, refactors, docs, tests)
- **Why it changed**: Infer motivation from commit messages and code changes
- **Impact**: Breaking changes, new dependencies, migrations needed
- **Testing**: What tests were added/modified, how to verify manually

### 3. Check for Related Issues

Look for issue references:
- In commit messages (e.g., "fixes #123", "closes #456")
- In branch name (e.g., `fix/issue-123-description`)
- In code comments or TODOs addressed

### 4. Generate PR Description

Create the PR using this template structure:

```bash
gh pr create --title "<type>(<scope>): <description>" --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## Summary

<1-3 sentence overview of what this PR does and why>

## Changes

<Categorized bullet list of changes>

### Added
- <new features or capabilities>

### Changed
- <modifications to existing functionality>

### Fixed
- <bug fixes>

### Removed
- <deprecated or removed functionality>

## Motivation

<Why were these changes needed? What problem does this solve?>

## Testing

<How was this tested?>

- [ ] Unit tests added/updated
- [ ] Integration tests added/updated
- [ ] Manual testing performed

### Manual Testing Steps

<If applicable, steps to manually verify the changes>

## Breaking Changes

<If any, describe what breaks and migration path. Remove section if none.>

## Related Issues

<Link to related issues. Remove section if none.>

- Closes #<issue_number>
- Related to #<issue_number>

## Checklist

- [ ] Code follows project style guidelines
- [ ] Self-review completed
- [ ] Tests pass locally
- [ ] Linting passes
- [ ] Documentation updated (if needed)

---

Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
EOF
)"
```

### 5. Title Format

Use conventional commit format for the PR title:
- `feat(scope): add new feature`
- `fix(scope): correct bug behavior`
- `refactor(scope): restructure without behavior change`
- `docs(scope): update documentation`
- `test(scope): add or modify tests`
- `chore(scope): maintenance tasks`

### 6. Apply Labels

After creating the PR, apply appropriate labels based on the changes. Use `gh pr edit <number> --add-label <label>`.

Check the repository's available labels first:
```bash
gh label list
```

#### Common Type Labels

| Label | When to Use |
|-------|-------------|
| `enhancement` | New features, capabilities, or improvements |
| `bug` | Bug fixes |
| `documentation` | Documentation-only changes |
| `breaking-change` | **User-facing** breaking changes requiring migration |

#### Breaking Change Criteria

Only apply `breaking-change` for **user-facing** changes that require users to modify their:
- Configuration files
- CLI invocations
- API integrations

Do NOT apply for internal refactors unless they affect external consumers.

### 7. After Creation

After creating the PR:
1. Display the PR URL with applied labels
2. Suggest adding reviewers if appropriate
3. Note if any CI checks need to pass

## Guidelines

**DO:**
- Be specific about what changed and why
- Include testing evidence
- Link related issues
- Note breaking changes prominently
- Remove empty optional sections

**DON'T:**
- Include irrelevant commits (keep PR focused)
- Leave placeholder text in the description
- Skip the testing section
- Create PRs without running local checks first

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.