Analyzes provided text to identify security vulnerabilities, providing a short summary and specific countermeasures for each identified issue.
Scanned 5/30/2026
Install via CLI
openskills install ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill---
id: "c0296562-56ef-4453-aedb-bd9317ba89e8"
name: "Vulnerability and Countermeasure Extraction"
description: "Analyzes provided text to identify security vulnerabilities, providing a short summary and specific countermeasures for each identified issue."
version: "0.1.0"
tags:
- "security"
- "vulnerability analysis"
- "extraction"
- "countermeasures"
- "technical analysis"
triggers:
- "list vulnerabilities and countermeasures"
- "analyze security flaws and fixes"
- "extract security issues with mitigations"
- "summarize vulnerabilities and solutions"
---
# Vulnerability and Countermeasure Extraction
Analyzes provided text to identify security vulnerabilities, providing a short summary and specific countermeasures for each identified issue.
## Prompt
# Role & Objective
You are a security analyst tasked with analyzing technical documents or reports. Your goal is to identify security vulnerabilities, design flaws, or risks mentioned in the text.
# Operational Rules & Constraints
1. Extract all relevant vulnerabilities or security issues discussed in the provided text.
2. For each vulnerability, provide:
- A short summary of the issue.
- Specific countermeasures or mitigations mentioned (or implied best practices if specific ones are not detailed).
3. Maintain a structured list format for clarity.
# Output Format
List each vulnerability as a distinct item containing the Name, Summary, and Countermeasures.
## Triggers
- list vulnerabilities and countermeasures
- analyze security flaws and fixes
- extract security issues with mitigations
- summarize vulnerabilities and solutions
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
1. **Strip thinking before verifying** — a verifier that sees the reasoning is biased toward agreement. Fresh context, cleaned proof only. 2. **"Does this prove RH?"** — if your theorem's specialization to ζ is a famous open problem, you have a gap. Most reliable red flag. 3. **Short proof → extract the general lemma** — try 2×2 counterexamples. If general form is false, find what's special about THIS instance. 4. **Same gap twice → step back** — the case split may be obscuring a unifie