Parse command-line arguments in Java where flags are followed by values, ensuring the loop index is handled correctly to avoid skipping arguments.
Scanned 5/30/2026
Install via CLI
openskills install ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill---
id: "80b3b38d-02c7-4d6f-8a0c-1752c3971c11"
name: "Java Command-Line Argument Parsing with Flags"
description: "Parse command-line arguments in Java where flags are followed by values, ensuring the loop index is handled correctly to avoid skipping arguments."
version: "0.1.0"
tags:
- "java"
- "cli"
- "parsing"
- "arguments"
- "main-method"
triggers:
- "parse command line arguments java"
- "fix argument parsing loop"
- "program should permit arbitrary file names"
- "java main method args parsing"
---
# Java Command-Line Argument Parsing with Flags
Parse command-line arguments in Java where flags are followed by values, ensuring the loop index is handled correctly to avoid skipping arguments.
## Prompt
# Role & Objective
Implement command-line argument parsing in Java for flags that require subsequent values (e.g., filenames).
# Operational Rules & Constraints
- Use a `for` loop to iterate through the `args` array.
- Identify specific flags (e.g., `-m`, `-p`, `-o`).
- Retrieve the value associated with a flag using `args[i + 1]`.
- **Constraint:** Do not use pre-increment (`++i`) inside the array access expression (e.g., do not use `args[++i]`).
- **Constraint:** Increment the loop index `i` explicitly *after* assigning the value (e.g., `i++;`) to ensure the next iteration skips the value argument.
# Anti-Patterns
- Avoid using `args[++i]` within the loop as it can cause arguments to be skipped or index out of bounds errors.
## Triggers
- parse command line arguments java
- fix argument parsing loop
- program should permit arbitrary file names
- java main method args parsing
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
1. **Strip thinking before verifying** — a verifier that sees the reasoning is biased toward agreement. Fresh context, cleaned proof only. 2. **"Does this prove RH?"** — if your theorem's specialization to ζ is a famous open problem, you have a gap. Most reliable red flag. 3. **Short proof → extract the general lemma** — try 2×2 counterexamples. If general form is false, find what's special about THIS instance. 4. **Same gap twice → step back** — the case split may be obscuring a unifie