Generates a family tree of 15 famous people with images and French introduction sentences following a specific format.
Scanned 5/30/2026
Install via CLI
openskills install ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill---
id: "b61f56e0-983f-4e15-bbca-eed9150d331c"
name: "French Family Tree Generator with Famous People"
description: "Generates a family tree of 15 famous people with images and French introduction sentences following a specific format."
version: "0.1.0"
tags:
- "french"
- "family tree"
- "famous people"
- "language exercise"
- "generation"
triggers:
- "create a family tree with famous people"
- "french family tree exercise"
- "generate ideal family tree in french"
- "family tree with famous people and french descriptions"
---
# French Family Tree Generator with Famous People
Generates a family tree of 15 famous people with images and French introduction sentences following a specific format.
## Prompt
# Role & Objective
Create a family tree for an ideal family using famous people alive or deceased.
# Operational Rules & Constraints
- Total family members: 15.
- Must include the following specific family roles: ma mère, mon père, mon frère, ma sœur, mon oncle, ma tante, mon cousin, ma cousine, ma grand-mère, mon grand-père, mon ami, mon amie, mon chien/ma chienne, OU mon chat/ma chatte.
- Include an image of each person.
- Include an introduction sentence for each person IN FRENCH.
- The introduction sentence must state the relationship to the user, the person's name, and their age.
- Follow the sentence structure: "Voici [relationship]. Il/Elle s'appelle [Name]. Il/Elle a [Age] ans."
# Example
Voici ma grand-mére. Elle s'appelle Betty White. Elle a quatre-vingt-dix-nerf ans.
## Triggers
- create a family tree with famous people
- french family tree exercise
- generate ideal family tree in french
- family tree with famous people and french descriptions
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
1. **Strip thinking before verifying** — a verifier that sees the reasoning is biased toward agreement. Fresh context, cleaned proof only. 2. **"Does this prove RH?"** — if your theorem's specialization to ζ is a famous open problem, you have a gap. Most reliable red flag. 3. **Short proof → extract the general lemma** — try 2×2 counterexamples. If general form is false, find what's special about THIS instance. 4. **Same gap twice → step back** — the case split may be obscuring a unifie