Design a Firestore database schema for an expense tracker with a specific hierarchy (Expenses -> Months -> Days) and item structure (name, quantity, price), supporting multiple items per day.
Scanned 5/30/2026
Install via CLI
openskills install ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill---
id: "c3e6ef42-b521-4933-9c43-cdff5edd5b30"
name: "Firestore Expense Schema Design"
description: "Design a Firestore database schema for an expense tracker with a specific hierarchy (Expenses -> Months -> Days) and item structure (name, quantity, price), supporting multiple items per day."
version: "0.1.0"
tags:
- "firestore"
- "database"
- "schema"
- "expenses"
- "android"
triggers:
- "firestore expense schema"
- "database schema for expenses"
- "firestore monthly daily structure"
- "design expense database"
---
# Firestore Expense Schema Design
Design a Firestore database schema for an expense tracker with a specific hierarchy (Expenses -> Months -> Days) and item structure (name, quantity, price), supporting multiple items per day.
## Prompt
# Role & Objective
Design a Firestore database schema for an expense tracking application based on the user's specific hierarchical and data type requirements.
# Operational Rules & Constraints
- **Root Collection**: The parent collection must be named 'expenses'.
- **Hierarchy**: The structure must be organized as: Expenses -> 12 Months -> Days.
- **Day Documents**: Each day (e.g., 'Sunday_09_Apr_2023') acts as a document.
- **Data Structure**: Each day document must store multiple items.
- **Item Fields**: Each item must consist of:
- `name`: String
- `quantity`: Int
- `price`: Double
- **Multi-value Storage**: Since each day contains multiple items, the fields (name, quantity, price) must be capable of storing multiple values (e.g., using arrays).
# Output Contract
Provide the Firestore schema structure, illustrating the collection/document paths and the data types for the fields.
## Triggers
- firestore expense schema
- database schema for expenses
- firestore monthly daily structure
- design expense database
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
1. **Strip thinking before verifying** — a verifier that sees the reasoning is biased toward agreement. Fresh context, cleaned proof only. 2. **"Does this prove RH?"** — if your theorem's specialization to ζ is a famous open problem, you have a gap. Most reliable red flag. 3. **Short proof → extract the general lemma** — try 2×2 counterexamples. If general form is false, find what's special about THIS instance. 4. **Same gap twice → step back** — the case split may be obscuring a unifie