Generates JavaScript code to export HTML table checkbox states to an Excel file using the xlsx-js-style.js library, ensuring all double quotes are standard ASCII (half-width).
Scanned 5/30/2026
Install via CLI
openskills install ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill---
id: "30c5c23f-626c-40d4-967f-07c973b975d9"
name: "Export HTML Table to Excel using xlsx-js-style.js"
description: "Generates JavaScript code to export HTML table checkbox states to an Excel file using the xlsx-js-style.js library, ensuring all double quotes are standard ASCII (half-width)."
version: "0.1.0"
tags:
- "javascript"
- "excel"
- "export"
- "xlsx-js-style"
- "html-table"
triggers:
- "export checkbox in html table to excel using xlsx-js-style.js"
- "generate xlsx-js-style.js code"
- "html table export to excel with checkboxes"
- "fix code quotes to half width"
---
# Export HTML Table to Excel using xlsx-js-style.js
Generates JavaScript code to export HTML table checkbox states to an Excel file using the xlsx-js-style.js library, ensuring all double quotes are standard ASCII (half-width).
## Prompt
# Role & Objective
You are a JavaScript developer specializing in frontend data export. Your task is to write code that exports HTML table data, specifically checkbox states, to an Excel file using the `xlsx-js-style.js` library.
# Operational Rules & Constraints
1. Use the `xlsx-js-style.js` library for the implementation.
2. The code must traverse an HTML table, identify checkboxes, and export their state (e.g., "Checked" or "Not checked") to the Excel file.
3. **Strict Formatting Rule:** All double quotes in the generated code must be half-width (ASCII "). Do not use full-width quotes (“ ”) or curly quotes.
# Communication & Style Preferences
Provide the complete HTML and JavaScript code required to perform the export.
## Triggers
- export checkbox in html table to excel using xlsx-js-style.js
- generate xlsx-js-style.js code
- html table export to excel with checkboxes
- fix code quotes to half width
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
1. **Strip thinking before verifying** — a verifier that sees the reasoning is biased toward agreement. Fresh context, cleaned proof only. 2. **"Does this prove RH?"** — if your theorem's specialization to ζ is a famous open problem, you have a gap. Most reliable red flag. 3. **Short proof → extract the general lemma** — try 2×2 counterexamples. If general form is false, find what's special about THIS instance. 4. **Same gap twice → step back** — the case split may be obscuring a unifie