License

---
name: license
description: Decide what may be carried over from a prey repository under its license. Modes are COPY, COPY_FILE, REIMPLEMENT, IDEAS_ONLY and HUMAN. Use when a nutrient's license mode is unclear, when asked whether code or configs from another repository may be copied, or when a sniff verdict says HUMAN. Do not use to choose the maw's own license, for general legal advice, or for licensing questions unrelated to prey-to-maw transfer.
---

# License rules

The verdict is produced by a deterministic engine (`crab sniff`, `license.json` in a digest).
Your job is to apply the mode, explain it, and stop when the engine says `HUMAN`.

## Modes

| Mode | Allowed | Required |
|---|---|---|
| `COPY` | copy code, configs and text | keep the copyright notice; publish through `crab serve --as pr-branch` with a materialization receipt (the `serve` skill), which records the source in `.crab/attributions.json` and renders `THIRD_PARTY_NOTICES.md`; Apache-2.0 also needs the NOTICE file's attribution notices carried over |
| `COPY_FILE` | copy whole files (MPL-2.0, EPL, CC-BY-SA documents) | the file keeps its own license header; do not merge it into files under the maw license; every file in the receipt is verbatim |
| `REIMPLEMENT` | use the prey as a specification | clean room: a spec without code, then the `crab-cleanroom-impl` subagent without prey-cache access; record "implemented from a specification" in the trace |
| `IDEAS_ONLY` | ideas, architecture, approaches, facts | not a line of code, configuration or documentation text |
| `HUMAN` | nothing yet | a person decides; present the evidence (`license.json`: files, manifests, headers, conflicts) |

## Rules that override the matrix

1. Issue, discussion and pull-request comment text is always `IDEAS_ONLY`: the copyright belongs
   to the commenters. Carry over the need and a link, not the text. The CLI enforces this from
   content origin, records the origin and cap reason in the nutrient trace, and `crab serve`
   carries that trace into the served issue; do not recalculate the cap by hand. The cap
   rewrites the card's title and `what`; your `why` and `how` are yours to keep clean, and
   `crab serve` refuses a card of any origin but `licensed` whose notes quote one of the prey's
   issue titles, in any punctuation or case, or whose notes cannot be checked.
2. Configuration files and small snippets are not automatically free: same mode as code.
3. **`strict` mode is not implemented yet, and must not be applied by hand.** `.crab.yml` accepts
   `mode: strict` and the engine ignores it: no verdict changes. Do not perform that downgrade
   yourself. Explicit `REIMPLEMENT` nutrients now have a clean-room destination, but that does not
   authorize an agent to invent a `REIMPLEMENT` verdict for an ignored strict setting. When strict
   lands, the deterministic engine must make the downgrade before the clean-room protocol is used.
4. Per-file exceptions in `license.json` (vendored directories, headers with another SPDX id)
   override the repository license for those files.
5. **No license at all is `IDEAS_ONLY` with human review, not `HUMAN`.** `HUMAN` is only for a
   license that was read and could not be classified. The two ask for different things: under
   `IDEAS_ONLY` the need and the facts may still travel, under `HUMAN` nothing may until a person
   answers.
6. **Review is a flag, not a mode.** A conflict between the LICENSE file and a manifest does not
   change the verdict — the mode still comes from the detected license, and the digest records
   the conflict in `license.json` under `conflicts` with `human_review: true` beside it. Read
   both: `human_review` is also true for a source-available license, whose mode is `IDEAS_ONLY`.

## How to compute a mode

- `crab sniff <prey> --maw .` prints the mode for this maw.
- `license.json` in the prey digest has `modes_by_maw_class` (permissive, gpl, proprietary maws)
  and `verdict` when a maw license was known at digest time.
- The full matrix is in `references/matrix.md`.

This is a compliance aid, not legal advice; say so when the user asks about an edge case.