Interactive onboarding walkthrough for a new engineer. Use for "give me a tour", "onboard me", "walk me through the codebase".
Scanned 9/22/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add drafthq/draft --skill tour --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Tour?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/drafthq-tour)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: tour
description: Interactive onboarding walkthrough for a new engineer. Use for "give me a tour", "onboard me", "walk me through the codebase".
---
# Draft Tour: Interactive Onboarding
Provide an interactive codebase walk-through based on existing architecture and guardrail constraints.
## Red Flags - STOP if you're
- Dumping the entire `architecture.md` into the chat window.
- Giving answers to foundational pattern questions before prompting the developer to guess.
- Explaining code the developer hasn't explicitly asked to view yet.
---
## Execution Constraints
1. **Load Context:** Read `draft/architecture.md`, `draft/tech-stack.md`, and `draft/guardrails.md`.
2. **Interactive Cadence:** Ask the developer if they are familiar with the tech stack constraints found in `draft/tech-stack.md`.
3. **Module Introduction:** Instead of listing all modules, introduce the "Entry Point" module first.
4. **Active Challenge:** After explaining a module's responsibility, challenge the developer: "Based on our *Context-Driven Development* rules, how do you think we handle data persistence here?" Wait for their answer before revealing the architecture strategy.
- If the answer is correct, confirm briefly and cite the supporting line in `architecture.md` / `guardrails.md`.
- If the answer is partially right, name what they got right, then ask a narrower follow-up (e.g., "Right that we cache reads — what's the invalidation trigger?") before revealing the rest.
- If the answer is wrong, do not just hand them the answer. Quote the specific guardrail or HLD section that contradicts it, then re-prompt with a hint scoped to that section.
5. **Traceability:** Highlight `draft/.state/facts.json` showing how module constraints have evolved.
6. **Track Lifecycle Walk:** Show the full feature lifecycle and who owns each gate:
- `/draft:new-track` → `spec.md` (requirements + classification + approvers) + `plan.md` (phases/tasks)
- `/draft:decompose` → `hld.md` (always, with graph-derived diagrams) + `lld.md` (when --lld or High-complexity module)
- **Approvers (HLD):** Technical Leads, Architecture Review Board, Cloud Operations (SaaS), QA Leads (on-prem), PM Leads
- **Approvers (LLD):** Team Leads, Technical Leads, Quality Assurance
- `/draft:implement` → TDD loop reading lld.md/hld.md for stub generation
- `/draft:upload` → blocks `git upload` for high/mission-critical tracks until HLD §Approvals signed
- `/draft:deploy-checklist` → blocks deploy until HLD §Checklist + LLD §Alerting Thresholds populated
- Walk a real example track from `draft/tracks/` if any exist; otherwise sketch a hypothetical low-criticality flow.
7. **Completion:** Guide the developer to create their first test track using `/draft:new-track` so they understand the artifact loop end-to-end.
---
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!