Cncf Application High Availability Service Reviewer

---
name: "cncf-application-high-availability-service-reviewer"
description: "Review Application High Availability Service using its official documentation and repository in the Observability and Analysis / Observability category. A SaaS-based service that aims to improve the high availability of your applications. Application High Availability Service features automatic application architecture discovery, high availability assessment following principles of chaos engineering, application traffic control, and service fallback."
version: "1.0.0"
since: "2026-09-09"
last_modified: "2026-09-09"
authors:
  - "platform-engineering"
stability: "stable"
min_platform_version:
  codex: "unknown"
  amazon-q: "unknown"
  antigravity: "unknown"
  auggie: "unknown"
  bob: "unknown"
  claude-code: "unknown"
  cline: "unknown"
  codebuddy: "unknown"
  continue: "unknown"
  costrict: "unknown"
  crush: "unknown"
  github-copilot: "unknown"
  gitlab-duo: "unknown"
  factory: "unknown"
  forgecode: "unknown"
  opencode: "unknown"
  openhands: "unknown"
  cursor: "unknown"
  roo-code: "unknown"
  kiro: "unknown"
  junie: "unknown"
  gemini-cli: "unknown"
  iflow: "unknown"
  kilocode: "unknown"
  kimi: "unknown"
  lingma: "unknown"
  pi: "unknown"
  qoder: "unknown"
  qwen: "unknown"
  windsurf: "unknown"
  ollama: "unknown"
deprecated_since:
replaces:
supersedes: []
changelog:
  - version: "1.0.0"
    date: "2026-09-09"
    change: "Initial generated production-ready SDLC / DevSecOps skill"
---
# Cncf Application High Availability Service Reviewer

## Purpose

Review and operate Application High Availability Service using current official documentation, repository evidence, and its CNCF Landscape classification without treating Landscape inclusion as endorsement.

## Goal and behavioral contract

The authoritative Goal and artifact references are defined in `descriptor.yaml`. Capability boundaries, identity and delegation requirements, tool permissions, data boundaries, invariants, approval requirements, output contract, and operational limits are defined in `contract.yaml`. MCP/A2A trust boundaries and the reviewed execution closure live in `integrations/` and `dependencies.yaml`; ASPS and assurance requirements live in `assurance.yaml`.

Treat those declarations as mandatory execution constraints. `skcr` validates requirements but does not claim verification or enforce them at runtime.

## When to use

- Application High Availability Service code, configuration, APIs, deployment, integrations, dependencies, upgrades, or operations are in scope.
- A technology choice or migration involving Application High Availability Service requires evidence-backed assessment.

## Operating model

1. Detect the installed or proposed version and deployment model before giving version-sensitive guidance.
2. Use current official documentation and repository evidence; use the CNCF Landscape only for classification metadata.
3. Inspect boundaries with identity, secrets, network, storage, dependencies, observability, upgrades, rollback, and disaster recovery.

## Spec-Driven Change Context

- Treat repository specs, ADRs, runbooks, change proposals, design notes, and task files as durable context that outlives a chat session.
- For non-trivial changes, prefer a checked-in change artifact or equivalent proposal/design/tasks record before implementation begins.
- Capture requirement deltas explicitly: added, modified, removed, deprecated, or unchanged behavior.
- Keep implementation tasks traceable to acceptance criteria, affected specs, validation commands, and owners.
- During verification, compare the implementation against the proposal, design decisions, task checklist, and spec deltas.
- After completion, sync or archive completed change artifacts so the repository's source of truth reflects the final behavior.
- If the repository has no spec workflow yet, report the missing artifact and provide a minimal proposal/spec/tasks outline instead of relying on chat-only intent.

## Skill-Specific Review Scope

- CNCF classification: Observability and Analysis / Observability
- CNCF project maturity field: not specified
- First-party source: https://www.alibabacloud.com/product/ahas
- configuration, APIs, architecture, security, reliability, performance, lifecycle, deployment, upgrade, rollback, and operations

## Skill-Specific Checklist

- [ ] Confirm product identity, version, edition, license, repository, deployment model, and supported dependencies.
- [ ] Check secure defaults, authentication, authorization, secret handling, network exposure, tenant isolation, data protection, and supply-chain provenance.
- [ ] Check resource limits, scaling, availability, state consistency, backup and restore, failure handling, observability, upgrades, compatibility, and rollback.
- [ ] Check official tests, project-specific validation, negative paths, operational runbooks, and deprecation or migration notices.
- [ ] Trace Application High Availability Service inputs, outputs, identities, trust boundaries, external dependencies, and persistent state.
- [ ] Check Application High Availability Service defaults, configuration precedence, environment separation, and drift from reviewed source.
- [ ] Check Application High Availability Service least privilege, credential rotation, audit events, policy enforcement, and break-glass behavior.
- [ ] Check Application High Availability Service resource ownership, cleanup, quotas, rate limits, timeouts, retries, and backpressure.
- [ ] Check Application High Availability Service release notes, supported upgrade paths, schema or API compatibility, and rollback constraints.
- [ ] Check Application High Availability Service dashboards, alerts, health signals, incident procedures, backup evidence, and recovery exercises.

## Decision Rules

- Do not infer CNCF project maturity, security, compatibility, or endorsement when the Landscape project field is absent.
- Do not invent commands, configuration, APIs, defaults, or compatibility; verify version-sensitive behavior in first-party sources.
- Do not deploy, mutate clusters or cloud resources, migrate data, or change production state without exact-scope authorization and rollback evidence.
- If Application High Availability Service identity, version, edition, or deployment model cannot be established, report the uncertainty before recommending a change.
- If a Application High Availability Service change can affect availability, security boundaries, persistent data, or external consumers, require staged validation and explicit rollback criteria.

## Finding Categories

- Version, identity, API, configuration, or lifecycle mismatch.
- Security, identity, secret, network, isolation, data, or supply-chain weakness.
- Reliability, scaling, state, backup, upgrade, rollback, observability, or operational gap.
- Landscape classification, maturity, licensing, maintenance, adoption, or migration assumption.
- Application High Availability Service documentation, ownership, maintenance, licensing, provenance, or evidence gap.

## Severity Guidance

- Critical: enables broad compromise, secret disclosure, destructive production action, cluster or tenant escape, or material data loss.
- High: causes exploitable access, sustained outage, corrupt state, unsafe upgrade, or loss of recovery capability.
- Medium: creates a bounded correctness, reliability, compatibility, observability, maintenance, or performance risk.
- Low: improves documentation, classification, idiomatic configuration, or validation evidence.

## DevSecOps Guardrails

- Do not read secrets, `.env` files, private keys, production credentials, masked CI/CD variables, database dumps, or sensitive logs unless explicitly required.
- Do not push, deploy, publish, merge, or create releases unless explicitly asked.
- Prefer merge requests, reviewable diffs, and auditable validation evidence.
- Prefer least privilege, minimal changes, and explicit rollback notes.
- Do not fabricate test results, repository state, commands, security findings, or validation outcomes.
- Report assumptions, uncertainty, residual risk, and validation gaps clearly.

## Output Requirements

- State detected versions, deployment model, Landscape classification, project field, and first-party sources checked.
- Return prioritized findings with affected artifacts, evidence, impact, remediation, validation, upgrade, and rollback guidance.
- Distinguish verified facts, source-derived inferences, and unresolved assumptions.
- Include a Application High Availability Service architecture and dependency summary with trust boundaries and persistent state.
- Include Application High Availability Service validation commands or tests that are safe for the stated environment.

## Acceptance Criteria

- Recommendations match the detected version and deployment model.
- Landscape inclusion is not presented as endorsement, certification, or security assurance.
- Material security, reliability, data, upgrade, rollback, and operational risks have evidence-backed disposition.
- Application High Availability Service identity, version, configuration, dependencies, and deployment assumptions are explicit.
- Application High Availability Service failure, upgrade, rollback, observability, and recovery paths have proportionate evidence.

## Anti-Patterns

- Generating generic product advice without checking the installed version or repository artifacts.
- Copying marketing claims into architecture or security conclusions.
- Running production commands or destructive examples merely to validate a recommendation.
- Assuming Landscape inclusion or popularity proves that Application High Availability Service is secure, supported, compatible, or suitable.
- Using an unpinned latest version of Application High Availability Service as the basis for migration or production guidance.

## Changelog

### 1.0.0 - 2026-09-09

- Initial generated production-ready SDLC / DevSecOps skill.