Fix intermittent 500 errors with "Failed to store" in Fastly KV Store during concurrent writes. Use when: (1) Batch operations fail with ~10-20% error rate, (2) Error contains "Failed to store list" or similar KV write failures, (3) Multiple requests updating the same KV key simultaneously, (4) Read-modify-write pattern without locking. The fix is adding a retry loop that re-reads before each write attempt.
Scanned 9/3/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add divinevideo/divine-mobile --skill fastly-kv-concurrent-write-retry --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Fastly Kv Concurrent Write Retry?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/divinevideo-fastly-kv-concurrent-write-retry-divine-mobile)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: fastly-kv-concurrent-write-retry
description: |
Fix intermittent 500 errors with "Failed to store" in Fastly KV Store during concurrent
writes. Use when: (1) Batch operations fail with ~10-20% error rate, (2) Error contains
"Failed to store list" or similar KV write failures, (3) Multiple requests updating the
same KV key simultaneously, (4) Read-modify-write pattern without locking. The fix is
adding a retry loop that re-reads before each write attempt.
author: Claude Code
version: 1.0.0
date: 2026-01-28
---
# Fastly KV Store Concurrent Write Race Condition
## Problem
When multiple concurrent requests perform read-modify-write operations on the same
Fastly KV Store key, writes can fail with intermittent 500 errors. This commonly
occurs during batch uploads where each request updates a shared list or counter.
## Context / Trigger Conditions
- Error message contains "Failed to store list:" or similar KV write failure
- ~10-20% failure rate during concurrent operations
- Multiple requests from the same user/session updating shared state
- Pattern: `read key → modify data → write key` without any locking
Example error:
```json
{"error":"Failed to store list:"}
```
## Solution
Add a retry loop that re-reads the data before each write attempt:
```rust
/// Add item to list with retry for concurrent writes
pub fn add_to_list(key: &str, item: &str) -> Result<()> {
// Retry up to 5 times for concurrent write conflicts
for attempt in 0..5 {
// Re-read current state on each attempt
let mut items = get_list(key)?;
if items.contains(&item.to_string()) {
return Ok(()); // Already exists, done
}
items.push(item.to_string());
match put_list(key, &items) {
Ok(()) => return Ok(()),
Err(e) if attempt < 4 => {
eprintln!("[KV] Retry {} for list update: {}", attempt + 1, e);
// Re-read picks up concurrent writes
continue;
}
Err(e) => return Err(e),
}
}
Err(Error::new("Max retries exceeded for list update"))
}
```
Key points:
1. **Re-read on each retry** - The fresh read picks up changes from concurrent writes
2. **Check for duplicates** - Avoid adding the same item twice
3. **Log retries** - Helps debug if issues persist
4. **Limit retries** - 5 attempts is usually sufficient
## Verification
- Batch operations that previously failed ~16% should now succeed ~100%
- Retry log messages (`[KV] Retry N for...`) indicate the mechanism is working
- If still failing after 5 retries, there may be a deeper issue
## Example
Before (race condition):
```rust
pub fn add_to_user_list(pubkey: &str, hash: &str) -> Result<()> {
let mut hashes = get_user_blobs(pubkey)?; // Read
if !hashes.contains(&hash) {
hashes.push(hash.to_string()); // Modify
put_user_list(pubkey, &hashes)?; // Write - CONFLICT!
}
Ok(())
}
```
After (with retry):
```rust
pub fn add_to_user_list(pubkey: &str, hash: &str) -> Result<()> {
for attempt in 0..5 {
let mut hashes = get_user_blobs(pubkey)?;
if hashes.contains(&hash) {
return Ok(());
}
hashes.push(hash.to_string());
match put_user_list(pubkey, &hashes) {
Ok(()) => return Ok(()),
Err(e) if attempt < 4 => continue,
Err(e) => return Err(e),
}
}
Err(Error::new("Max retries exceeded"))
}
```
## Notes
- Fastly Compute doesn't have `sleep()`, so retries happen immediately
- The re-read is what provides the "delay" by picking up concurrent changes
- Consider using atomic operations if available (Fastly KV doesn't support CAS)
- For high-contention scenarios, consider sharding the key space
- This pattern also applies to remove operations (read-filter-write)
## References
- [Fastly KV Store Documentation](https://developer.fastly.com/reference/compute/kv-store/)
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!