Skip to content
Back to skills

Threat Model Majiayu000

ASecurity

STRIDE threat modeling before implementing security-sensitive features

  • 57 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 3 views
  • Added May 31, 2026
securityrustgosqlgitapisecurity

Works with

  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned May 31, 2026

npx -y skills add diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill --skill threat-model-majiayu000 --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Threat Model Majiayu000?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Threat Model Majiayu000
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/diegosouzapw-threat-model-majiayu000/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/diegosouzapw-threat-model-majiayu000)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: threat-model
description: STRIDE threat modeling before implementing security-sensitive features
triggers: [threat, STRIDE, attack surface, security design, new API, new feature security, threat model]
context_cost: medium
---

# Threat Model Skill

## Goal
Create a STRIDE threat model BEFORE implementing any security-sensitive feature. Prevents security issues at design time (cheapest point to fix) rather than after implementation (expensive) or in production (catastrophic).

## When to Invoke
- Before implementing: authentication, authorization, user registration, file upload
- Before implementing: payment processing, data storage, API endpoints, admin features
- Before any feature that handles: PII, financial data, health data, secrets, files

## Steps

1. **Identify system components and trust boundaries**
   - Reference the C4 Component diagram if it exists (`docs/architecture/`)
   - Draw the data flow: user → entry point → processing → storage → response
   - Mark trust boundaries (where permissions or privilege changes)
   - Identify actors: authenticated user, anonymous user, admin, external service, attacker

2. **Apply STRIDE to each component**

   For each component (API endpoint, service, data store), systematically ask:

   **S — Spoofing (impersonation)**
   - Can an attacker pretend to be another user or service?
   - Example threats: stolen JWT tokens, forged API keys, session hijacking

   **T — Tampering (data modification)**
   - Can an attacker modify data in transit or at rest?
   - Example threats: MITM attacks, SQL injection, parameter tampering, mass assignment

   **R — Repudiation (deny actions)**
   - Can an attacker deny performing an action?
   - Example threats: no audit log, no digital signature for financial transactions

   **I — Information Disclosure (data leaks)**
   - Can an attacker access data they shouldn't see?
   - Example threats: IDOR, verbose error messages, log injection, SSRF

   **D — Denial of Service**
   - Can an attacker degrade or block service availability?
   - Example threats: no rate limiting, resource exhaustion, large file uploads

   **E — Elevation of Privilege**
   - Can an attacker gain more permissions than they should have?
   - Example threats: JWT algorithm confusion, IDOR to admin endpoints, business logic bypass

3. **Score each threat**

   | Factor | Low | Medium | High |
   |---|---|---|---|
   | **Likelihood** | Attacker needs special access/skills | Known exploit pattern exists | Trivial to exploit |
   | **Impact** | Minor data exposure | User data compromised | All data, system compromise |

   Priority = Likelihood × Impact (High×High = Critical)

4. **Propose mitigations for High and Critical threats**

   ```markdown
   | Threat | STRIDE | L | I | Priority | Mitigation |
   |---|---|---|---|---|---|
   | Stolen JWT allows impersonation | S | H | H | Critical | Short expiry (15min), refresh token rotation, token revocation list |
   | IDOR on /users/{id} endpoint | I | M | H | High | Verify ownership: user.id === session.userId before returning |
   | No rate limit on /auth/login | D | H | M | High | Max 5 attempts/min per IP, 3 per account, exponential backoff |
   ```

5. **Fill THREAT_MODEL_TEMPLATE.md**
   - Save to: `docs/security/threat-models/[feature-name]-threat-model.md`

6. **Update CONSTITUTION.md** if new security invariants emerge
   - Example: "WHEN a user accesses /api/users/{id}, THE SYSTEM SHALL verify the requesting user owns that resource"

7. **Create tasks for mitigations**
   - Add each High/Critical mitigation to project/tasks.md
   - These are blocking tasks — must be implemented before the feature is complete

8. **Human review required**
   - Present threat model to human before implementing the feature
   - Confirm all Critical and High mitigations will be implemented

## STRIDE Quick Reference

| Letter | Category | Question to ask |
|---|---|---|
| S | Spoofing | Who is claiming to be who, and how do we verify it? |
| T | Tampering | What data can be modified by unauthorized parties? |
| R | Repudiation | Can actions be denied? Are they logged immutably? |
| I | Information Disclosure | What can be leaked, and to whom? |
| D | Denial of Service | What can be exhausted, flooded, or blocked? |
| E | Elevation of Privilege | How can someone gain more access than intended? |

## Constraints
- Threat modeling is MANDATORY before implementing: auth, payment, file storage, admin features
- All Critical threats must have implemented mitigations before feature ships
- High threats must have mitigations or documented risk acceptance by human
- Never implement a security control without documenting why it addresses a specific threat

## Output Format
Completed threat model file at `docs/security/threat-models/[name]-threat-model.md` + tasks added for mitigations.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.