Skip to content
Back to skills

Privgraph

ASecurity

Privacy and security annotation for Mermaid diagrams. Use this skill when: (1) a user shares or creates a Mermaid flowchart or sequence diagram and asks for privacy, security, or compliance review, (2) a user asks to annotate a diagram with data classifications, controls, trust boundaries, or compliance scope, (3) a user mentions 'privgraph', '@pg:', or 'risk-informed diagram', (4) a user asks about data flow risks, missing controls, or GDPR/HIPAA/PCI compliance gaps in an architecture diagra...

  • 57 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added October 17, 2026
securityrustgonodeapisecurity

Works with

  • cli
  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned October 17, 2026

npx -y skills add diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill --skill privgraph --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Privgraph?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Privgraph
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/diegosouzapw-privgraph/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/diegosouzapw-privgraph)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: privgraph
description: "Privacy and security annotation for Mermaid diagrams. Use this skill when: (1) a user shares or creates a Mermaid flowchart or sequence diagram and asks for privacy, security, or compliance review, (2) a user asks to annotate a diagram with data classifications, controls, trust boundaries, or compliance scope, (3) a user mentions 'privgraph', '@pg:', or 'risk-informed diagram', (4) a user asks about data flow risks, missing controls, or GDPR/HIPAA/PCI compliance gaps in an architecture diagram, (5) a user is writing a design doc with Mermaid diagrams and wants privacy/security feedback embedded in the diagram itself. Do NOT use for general Mermaid syntax help, diagram styling, or non-security topics."
---

# PrivGraph: Mermaid Security & Privacy Annotation

PrivGraph annotates Mermaid diagrams with privacy and security metadata using comment-based directives, then evaluates configurable rules to surface control gaps.

## Core Workflow

When a user presents a Mermaid diagram for privacy/security review:

1. **Parse** the diagram — identify nodes, edges, subgraphs, and any existing `@pg:` annotations
2. **Classify** — determine what data flows where (direct identifiers, health data, credentials, etc.)
3. **Annotate** — add `@pg:` directives as Mermaid comments for data classes, controls, boundaries, compliance
4. **Evaluate** — check the annotated diagram against the rule set (see `references/rules.yaml`)
5. **Report** — surface findings with severity, description, and remediation guidance

When a user asks to create a new annotated diagram from scratch, follow steps 2–5 after helping them build the diagram.

## Annotation Syntax

All annotations are Mermaid comments and do not affect rendering:

```
%% @pg:<directive> <target> <parameters>
```

### Directives

**`@pg:data-class`** — classify data on a flow
```
%% @pg:data-class A-->B DIRECT_ID, LOCATION
```

**`@pg:control`** — declare present or missing (`!`) controls on a node or flow
```
%% @pg:control UserDB encrypted-at-rest, access-controlled
%% @pg:control UserDB !retention-policy
%% @pg:control A-->B encrypted-in-transit
```

**`@pg:boundary`** — declare trust boundary crossing on a flow
```
%% @pg:boundary A-->B third-party
```

**`@pg:compliance`** — declare applicable compliance frameworks
```
%% @pg:compliance UserDB GDPR, CCPA
```

**`@pg:risk-accept`** — suppress a rule finding with justification
```
%% @pg:risk-accept Cache PG-003 "24hr TTL enforced at Redis level. Approved 2024-01-10"
```

**`@pg:meta`** — diagram-level metadata
```
%% @pg:meta owner "platform-team"
%% @pg:meta system "checkout-service"
%% @pg:meta reviewed "2024-01-15"
```

### Data Classifications

| Classification | Description | Examples |
|---------------|-------------|----------|
| `DIRECT_ID` | Direct identifiers | Names, emails, SSNs, phone numbers |
| `INDIRECT_ID` | Indirect/pseudonymous identifiers | Opaque IDs, UUIDs, session tokens, pseudonyms |
| `PHI` | Protected health information | EHR, Diagnoses, prescriptions, lab results |
| `PCI` | Payment card data | Card numbers, CVVs |
| `CREDENTIALS` | Authentication secrets | Passwords, API keys, tokens |
| `BIOMETRIC` | Biometric data | Fingerprints, face data, voice prints |
| `LOCATION` | Location data | GPS coordinates, IP-derived location |
| `FINANCIAL` | Financial data | Bank accounts, transactions |
| `SENSITIVE` | Other sensitive data | Catch-all for sensitive categories |
| `PUBLIC` | Non-sensitive data | Public content, marketing copy |

### Controls

`encrypted-at-rest`, `encrypted-in-transit`, `access-controlled`, `audit-logged`, `retention-policy`, `anonymized`, `minimized`, `consent-managed`, `dpa-in-place`

Prefix with `!` to mark a control as explicitly missing.

### Boundaries

`internal`, `third-party`, `cross-region`, `cross-cloud`, `public-internet`, `user-device`

### Compliance Frameworks

`GDPR`, `CCPA`, `HIPAA`, `PCI-DSS`, `SOC2`, `FERPA`

## Rule Evaluation

After annotating, evaluate the diagram against the rule set. Load `references/rules.yaml` for the full rule definitions. Here is the summary:

| Rule | Sev | Trigger |
|------|-----|---------|
| PG-001 | HIGH | DIRECT_ID/INDIRECT_ID/PHI flow missing `encrypted-in-transit` |
| PG-002 | HIGH | DIRECT_ID/INDIRECT_ID/PHI node missing `encrypted-at-rest` |
| PG-003 | MED | Sensitive data node missing `retention-policy` |
| PG-004 | HIGH | CREDENTIALS flow missing encryption |
| PG-005 | CRIT | DIRECT_ID to `third-party` missing `dpa-in-place` |
| PG-006 | HIGH | PHI to `third-party` boundary |
| PG-007 | MED | `cross-region` flow missing compliance annotation |
| PG-008 | HIGH | HIPAA-scoped flow missing `audit-logged` |
| PG-009 | MED | GDPR-scoped node missing `retention-policy` |
| PG-010 | LOW | Flow crosses boundary with no controls documented |
| PG-011 | INFO | Node has zero controls documented |

For each violation, check if a `@pg:risk-accept` suppresses it (matching target + rule ID). Suppressed findings should be noted but not reported as active violations.

## Reporting Format

Present findings grouped by severity. Use this structure:

```
## PrivGraph Review: [system name or file]

### Findings

🔴 **CRITICAL — PG-005: Direct Identifiers to Third Party Without DPA**
Flow: UserSvc → Analytics
DIRECT_ID is transferred to a third party without a documented DPA.
→ Add: `%% @pg:control Analytics dpa-in-place`

🟡 **HIGH — PG-001: Unencrypted Identifier Transfer**
Flow: Mobile → API
DIRECT_ID transferred without encryption in transit.
→ Add: `%% @pg:control Mobile-->API encrypted-in-transit`

### Summary
X critical, Y high, Z medium | N findings suppressed by @pg:risk-accept
```

Always output the **complete annotated diagram** (original diagram with all `@pg:` annotations added) so the user can copy-paste it directly.

## Handling Ambiguity

When data classifications are unclear from the diagram alone:
- Ask the user what data flows through ambiguous edges
- Default to the more sensitive classification when context suggests it
- Flag uncertain classifications with a comment: `%% TODO: Confirm data classification for A-->B`

When a diagram has no annotations yet, annotate it fully rather than just listing what's missing. Show the user what a complete annotation looks like.

## Supported Diagram Types

- **Flowcharts**: `flowchart LR/TB/etc.` — nodes, edges, subgraphs all supported
- **Sequence diagrams**: `sequenceDiagram` — participants map to nodes, messages map to edges, boxes map to subgraphs

For annotation target syntax in sequence diagrams, use participant names: `%% @pg:data-class Client->>Server DIRECT_ID`

## Examples

See `examples/flowchart-annotated.md` and `examples/sequence-annotated.md` for complete worked examples with annotations and findings.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.