Skip to content
Back to skills

Aar Neversight

ASecurity

After-Action Review—structured debrief asking what was expected, what happened, why the difference, and what next. Use after projects, launches, presentations, or any significant event.

  • 57 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added October 17, 2026
code-qualitygo

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned October 17, 2026

npx -y skills add diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skill --skill aar-neversight --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Aar Neversight?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Aar Neversight
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/diegosouzapw-aar-neversight/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/diegosouzapw-aar-neversight)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: aar
description: After-Action Review—structured debrief asking what was expected, what happened, why the difference, and what next. Use after projects, launches, presentations, or any significant event.
user-invocable: true
---

# After-Action Review

Conduct a structured debrief to extract learning from any significant event or experience.

## Instructions

Work through the four core questions honestly and specifically. Focus on events and systems, not blaming individuals.

### Output Format

**Event**: What are we reviewing?
**Date**: When did it happen?
**Participants**: Who was involved?

---

## 1. What Was Expected?

*Before the event, what did we think would happen?*

**Goals/Objectives**
- [What were we trying to achieve?]

**Plan**
- [What was the plan to achieve it?]

**Success Criteria**
- [How would we know if we succeeded?]

**Assumptions**
- [What did we assume would be true?]

---

## 2. What Actually Happened?

*Facts only—what occurred, not why*

**Timeline**
| Time | Event |
|------|-------|
| [When] | [What happened] |

**Outcomes**
- [What results did we get?]

**Compared to Expected**
| Expected | Actual | Gap |
|----------|--------|-----|
| [expectation] | [reality] | [+/-] |

---

## 3. Why the Difference?

*Analysis of the gap between expected and actual*

**What Went Well** (sustain these)
| Success | Contributing Factors |
|---------|---------------------|
| [what worked] | [why it worked] |

**What Didn't Go Well** (improve these)
| Problem | Root Cause |
|---------|-----------|
| [what failed] | [why it failed] |

**Surprises**
- [Things we didn't anticipate]

---

## 4. What Do We Do Next?

*Specific actions to sustain or improve*

**Sustain** (keep doing these)
| Action | Owner | How to Protect It |
|--------|-------|-------------------|
| [what to continue] | [who] | [mechanism] |

**Improve** (change these)
| Action | Owner | By When |
|--------|-------|---------|
| [what to change] | [who] | [deadline] |

---

**Key Takeaways**
Top 3 lessons from this review:
1. [Lesson]
2. [Lesson]
3. [Lesson]

**Follow-up**
When will we check if improvements are working?

## Guidelines

- Do this soon—memory fades fast
- Be specific: "Communication failed" → "We didn't update Slack until hour 3"
- Balance: Include what went well, not just problems
- Assign owners: Insights without ownership become forgotten
- Make it safe: Blame shuts down honesty

$ARGUMENTS

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.