Structured audit for stability gates — before releases, migrations, large refactors, or when agent confusion is detected. Use to prune, correct, and re-anchor the memory corpus before it drifts past useful.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Reviewing Memory?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/davidlee-reviewing-memory)
---
name: reviewing-memory
description: Structured audit for stability gates — before releases, migrations, large refactors, or when agent confusion is detected. Use to prune, correct, and re-anchor the memory corpus before it drifts past useful.
---
# Reviewing Memory
> **MCP shortcut:** If the doctrine MCP server is connected, use `memory_show`
> via MCP tool instead of `doctrine memory show` for machine-parseable JSON results with
> backlinks.
A stability-gate audit: systematically pull the highest-impact memories,
inspect their quality, and produce an auditable outcome for each. Run before a
release, a schema migration, an ADR that shifts subsystem boundaries, or when
`retrieve` returns contradictory or low-confidence results.
## Procedure
1. **Pull highest-impact memories.** Run `doctrine memory validate` corpus-wide
(no REF) to surface dangling relations, stale verifications, and expiring
drafts across the entire corpus. The output is your audit queue.
2. **Prioritize.** Order findings by impact:
- Memories with **scoped paths** that have seen high commit churn since
attestation (drift risk)
- **Attested** (verified) memories — stale attestation on a moving target is
worse than unattested
- High **severity** × high **weight** — wrong here hurts
3. **Run the checklist on each.** For every memory in the audit queue, check:
- **Provenance.** Is the source still traceable? Has the cited code/doc
moved?
- **Freshness.** Is the attestation recent? Has the scoped path churned
past usefulness?
- **Metadata efficiency.** Is the scope still accurate? Are tags stale?
Is the lifespan appropriate?
- **Scope accuracy.** Do the path/glob/command scopes still cover the
right surface?
- **Actionability.** Can a future agent act on this without further
research?
- **Duplication.** Does this memory overlap with another? Merge or
supersede.
4. **Thread hygiene.** Scan for lingering unverified threads (`memory list
--type thread`). For each:
- If still relevant, verify it (`doctrine memory verify <REF>`)
- If stale, archive it (`doctrine memory status <REF> archived`)
- If superseded by newer knowledge, supersede it (`doctrine memory status
<REF> superseded --by <SUCCESSOR>`)
5. **Produce outcomes.** Every reviewed item must land in exactly one
terminal state:
- `verified` — re-attested on current tree, metadata updated
- `corrected` — edited (`doctrine memory edit`) with updated scope,
trust, or content
- `superseded` — pointed at its successor via `memory status superseded
--by`
- `archived` — no longer actionable but kept for history
- `promoted` — converted to a durable artifact (ADR, spec, or doc) and
archived from memory
No memory leaves review without one of these outcomes recorded.