Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsBlogPro
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges
  • Chrome Extension
  • Skill Manager

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Code Reviewer 28

ASecurity

Comprehensive code review checking quality, security, and best practices. Triggers: CR, review, 審查, 檢查, check, 看一下, PR, code review, 品質.

2 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/27/2026
code-qualitysqlcode-reviewsecurity

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/27/2026

$npx -y skills add David-Li0406/meta-skill-evloving --skill code-reviewer-28 --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Code Reviewer 28?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Code Reviewer 28
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/david-li0406-code-reviewer-28/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/david-li0406-code-reviewer-28)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: code-reviewer
description: Comprehensive code review checking quality, security, and best practices. Triggers: CR, review, 審查, 檢查, check, 看一下, PR, code review, 品質.
---

# 程式碼審查技能

## 描述
對程式碼進行全面審查,檢查品質、安全性和最佳實踐。

## 觸發條件
- 「review 這段程式碼」
- 「檢查程式碼」
- 「code review」

## 審查項目

### 1. 程式碼品質
- 命名是否清晰
- 函數長度是否合理(建議 < 50 行)
- 是否遵循 DRY 原則
- 複雜度是否過高

### 2. 安全性
- SQL 注入風險
- XSS 漏洞
- 敏感資料暴露
- 權限檢查

### 3. 效能
- N+1 查詢問題
- 不必要的迴圈
- 記憶體洩漏風險

### 4. 可維護性
- 註解是否充足
- 錯誤處理是否完整
- 測試覆蓋率

## 輸出格式

```
## 審查結果

### ✅ 優點
- ...

### ⚠️ 建議改進
- [嚴重程度] 問題描述
  - 位置:第 X 行
  - 建議:...

### 📊 評分
- 品質:X/10
- 安全:X/10
- 效能:X/10
```

Attribution

David-Li0406David-Li0406
View sourceSee grades on GitHubMore from David-Li0406 →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Caveman Review

Ultra-compressed code review comments. Cuts noise from PR feedback while preserving the actionable signal. Each comment is one line: location, problem, fix. Use when user says "review this PR", "code review", "review the diff", "/review", or invokes /caveman-review. Auto-triggers when reviewing pull requests.

1100021 votes

Caveman Commit

Ultra-compressed commit message generator. Cuts noise from commit messages while preserving intent and reasoning. Conventional Commits format. Subject ≤50 chars, body only when "why" isn't obvious. Use when user says "write a commit", "commit message", "generate commit", "/commit", or invokes /caveman-commit. Auto-triggers when staging changes.

1100021 votes

Verification Loop

一个全面的 Claude Code 会话验证系统。

2456590 votes

Springboot Verification

Verification loop for Spring Boot projects: build, static analysis, tests with coverage, security scans, and diff review before release or PR.

2456590 votes

Django Verification

Verification loop for Django projects: migrations, linting, tests with coverage, security scans, and deployment readiness checks before release or PR.

2456590 votes
View all in code-quality →