Skip to content
Back to skills

Slice Tasks

ASecurity

PLANNING SPINE STEP 2 of 3 — Slice the work: break a scoped PRD into vertical-slice stories in specs/epics/. Use after scope-work (step 1), before plan-work (step 3). Not a substitute for scope-work or plan-work.

  • 274 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 3 views
  • Added October 25, 2026
developmentbashapi

Works with

  • cli
  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned October 25, 2026

npx -y skills add danielvm-git/bigpowers --skill slice-tasks --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Slice Tasks?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Slice Tasks
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/danielvm-git-slice-tasks/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/danielvm-git-slice-tasks)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: slice-tasks
model: sonnet
description: "PLANNING SPINE STEP 2 of 3 — Slice the work: break a scoped PRD into vertical-slice stories in specs/epics/. Use after scope-work (step 1), before plan-work (step 3). Not a substitute for scope-work or plan-work."
---

<!-- story: e45s29 -->

# Slice Tasks

> **Spine position:** Step 2 — scope-work → slice-tasks → plan-work.

Produce **epic capsule story tasks** in `specs/epics/eNN-slug/` — vertical slices, each independently deliverable and testable. Output: decoupled `eNNsYY-tasks.yaml` files with runnable verify commands. Legacy `specs/epics/ (see slice-tasks)` is deprecated; use capsule dirs + `execution-status.yaml`.

## Pre-flight

- [ ] Does `specs/product/SCOPE_LATEST.yaml` exist? If not, run `scope-work` first — you can't slice what you haven't bounded.
- [ ] Is the `release-plan.yaml` populated with the epics you're slicing? Epic IDs (e01, e02…) should exist before you create stories.
- [ ] Do you understand the difference between a horizontal layer and a vertical slice? (See anti-patterns below.)

## Process

0. **Read planning-context.yaml** — If `specs/planning-context.yaml` exists, read it first:
   ```bash
   test -f specs/planning-context.yaml && echo "Context found" || echo "No context — starting fresh"
   ```
   Use `feature_name`, `constraints`, and `out_of_scope` to inform slice boundaries. `key_decisions` in the file may constrain how stories are cut (e.g., "no external deps" constrains slice 2). If absent, proceed normally.

1. **Read context** — Read `specs/product/SCOPE_LATEST.yaml` and/or `specs/release-plan.yaml`. Understand what the epic delivers end-to-end.

2. **Cut tracer-bullet slices** — Identify the thinnest possible vertical path through the stack that delivers user value. Start with this slice; it will catch integration issues first. For example:
   - A search feature: first slice is "user types query → API returns results" (no filters, no pagination, no ranking — just the plumbing working end-to-end).
   - A checkout flow: first slice is "user clicks buy → order created" (no payment, no inventory, no email).

3. **Assign BCPs** — For each story, estimate Business Complexity Points (1–13). A 1-BCP story is a trivial change (one file, one concept). A 13-BCP story is a major feature across multiple modules. If a story exceeds 8 BCPs, consider splitting it.

4. **Each story** writes:
   - `eNNsYY-tasks.yaml` with `story_id`, `title`, `status`, `bcps`, `tasks[]` (each with `id`, `description`, `verify`, `status`)
   - Story spec `.md` files are written by `plan-work` and follow countable-story-format.md
   - The epic capsule manifest (`epic.yaml`) is updated to list the story ID and BCPs
   - **Requirement deltas (e45s29):** Stories that alter existing behavior MUST carry `delta:` in `epic.yaml` (`ADDED` | `MODIFIED` | `REMOVED` | `RENAMED`). `plan-work` expands deltas into full before/after requirement text.

5. **Order by WSJF** in `release-plan.yaml` epic list — highest WSJF first. Weight-shortest-job-first ensures the highest value arrives earliest.

6. **Validate slices** — Every slice must answer: "If this story ships, does a user get new value?" If the answer is "no, they need a later story too", the slice is too horizontal — cut vertically deeper.

> **HARD GATE** — No horizontal-only slices ("add all models") without a vertical path that proves integration. Every story must be independently demonstrable, even if it only handles the happy path.

> **HARD GATE** — Each task's `verify:` field must contain a runnable command (not "manually check" or "review visually"). If verification requires manual steps, prefix with `verify-script:` and write the steps in the story file.

## Anti-Patterns

- **Layer cakes** — "Week 1: all models. Week 2: all controllers. Week 3: all views." This hides integration risk until the end. Every story must cut through all layers.
- **Too-small slices** — If a slice takes < 30 minutes to implement, it's probably noise. Combine with adjacent slices.
- **Too-large slices** — If a slice takes > 3 days, it's an epic, not a story. Split further.

## Output

- `specs/epics/eNN-slug/eNNsYY-tasks.yaml` — per-story task breakdown with verify commands
- `specs/epics/eNN-slug/epic.yaml` — updated with story list and BCPs
- `specs/release-plan.yaml` — updated WSJF ordering (if needed)

## Verify

→ verify: `[ "$(find specs/epics -name '*-tasks.yaml' 2>/dev/null | wc -l | tr -d ' ')" -gt 0 ]`


<!-- story: e03s01 -->

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.