Employ the following tools and techniques to analyze the characteristics and behavior of malicious code: [organization-defined] ;
Scanned 9/3/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add CyberStrikeus/CyberStrike --skill SI-3(10)_malicious-code-analysis --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of SI 3(10) Malicious Code Analysis?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/cyberstrikeus-si-3-10-malicious-code-analysis)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: "SI-3(10)_malicious-code-analysis"
description: "Employ the following tools and techniques to analyze the characteristics and behavior of malicious code: [organization-defined] ;"
category: "input-validation"
version: "5.2.0"
author: "cyberstrike-official"
tags:
- nist
- sp800-53
- rev5
- si-3-10
- si
- enhancement
tech_stack:
- aws
- azure
- gcp
- linux
- windows
cwe_ids:
- CWE-20
chains_with: []
prerequisites:
- SI-3
severity_boost: {}
---
# SI-3(10) Malicious Code Analysis
> **Enhancement of:** SI-3
## High-Level Description
**Family:** System and Information Integrity (SI)
**Framework:** NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5
The use of malicious code analysis tools provides organizations with a more in-depth understanding of adversary tradecraft (i.e., tactics, techniques, and procedures) and the functionality and purpose of specific instances of malicious code. Understanding the characteristics of malicious code facilitates effective organizational responses to current and future threats. Organizations can conduct malicious code analyses by employing reverse engineering techniques or by monitoring the behavior of executing code.
## What to Check
- [ ] Verify SI-3(10) Malicious Code Analysis is documented in SSP
- [ ] Validate all 2 control requirements are implemented
- [ ] Confirm control is operating effectively
- [ ] Review evidence of continuous monitoring for SI-3(10)
- [ ] Verify enhancement builds upon base control SI-3
## How to Test
### Step 1: Review Documentation
Examine the System Security Plan (SSP) and related artifacts for SI-3(10) implementation details. Verify the organization has documented how this control is satisfied.
### Step 2: Validate Implementation
```
# For cloud environments, use cloud-audit-mcp tools
# For on-premises, review system configurations directly
# Example: Check if account management policies exist
grep -r "account.management\|access.control" /etc/security/ 2>/dev/null
```
### Step 3: Test Operating Effectiveness
Verify the control is actively functioning, not just documented. Check logs, configurations, and operational evidence.
## Tools
| Tool | Purpose | Usage |
| --------------- | -------------------------- | ------------------------------ |
| cloud-audit-mcp | Check integrity monitoring | `cloud_audit_monitoring` |
| AWS CLI | Review GuardDuty/Inspector | `aws guardduty list-detectors` |
## Remediation Guide
### Control Statement
Employ the following tools and techniques to analyze the characteristics and behavior of malicious code: [organization-defined] ; and
Incorporate the results from malicious code analysis into organizational incident response and flaw remediation processes.
### Implementation Guidance
The use of malicious code analysis tools provides organizations with a more in-depth understanding of adversary tradecraft (i.e., tactics, techniques, and procedures) and the functionality and purpose of specific instances of malicious code. Understanding the characteristics of malicious code facilitates effective organizational responses to current and future threats. Organizations can conduct malicious code analyses by employing reverse engineering techniques or by monitoring the behavior of executing code.
## Risk Assessment
| Finding | Severity | Impact |
| ------------------------------------------------ | -------- | ------------------------------------------- |
| SI-3(10) Malicious Code Analysis not implemented | High | System and Information Integrity |
| SI-3(10) partially implemented | Medium | Incomplete System and Information Integrity |
## CWE Categories
| CWE ID | Title |
| ------ | ------------------------- |
| CWE-20 | Improper Input Validation |
## References
- [NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 - SI-3(10)](https://csrc.nist.gov/projects/cprt/catalog#/cprt/framework/version/SP_800_53_5_1_1/home?element=si-3.10)
- [NIST SP 800-53A Rev 5 (Assessment Procedures)](https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/sp/800/53/a/r5/final)
- [NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 Full Catalog](https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/sp/800/53/r5/upd1/final)
## Checklist
- [ ] Control documented in SSP
- [ ] Implementation evidence collected
- [ ] Operating effectiveness validated
- [ ] Continuous monitoring in place
- [ ] Related controls (none) reviewed
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!