Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Sponsors
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory
Know which skills are safe — weekly.
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory
Is that skill safe to install?
Are you the author of SC 5 Denial Of Service Protection?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/cyberstrikeus-sc-5-denial-of-service-protection)
---
name: "SC-5_denial-of-service-protection"
description: "[organization-defined] the effects of the following types of denial-of-service events: [organization-defined] ;"
category: "configuration"
version: "5.2.0"
author: "cyberstrike-official"
tags:
- nist
- sp800-53
- rev5
- sc-5
- sc
tech_stack:
- aws
- azure
- gcp
- linux
- windows
- network
cwe_ids:
- CWE-311
chains_with:
- CP-2
- IR-4
- SC-6
- SC-7
- SC-40
prerequisites: []
severity_boost:
CP-2: "Chain with CP-2 for comprehensive security coverage"
IR-4: "Chain with IR-4 for comprehensive security coverage"
SC-6: "Chain with SC-6 for comprehensive security coverage"
---
# SC-5 Denial-of-service Protection
## High-Level Description
**Family:** System and Communications Protection (SC)
**Framework:** NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5
Denial-of-service events may occur due to a variety of internal and external causes, such as an attack by an adversary or a lack of planning to support organizational needs with respect to capacity and bandwidth. Such attacks can occur across a wide range of network protocols (e.g., IPv4, IPv6). A variety of technologies are available to limit or eliminate the origination and effects of denial-of-service events. For example, boundary protection devices can filter certain types of packets to protect system components on internal networks from being directly affected by or the source of denial-of-service attacks. Employing increased network capacity and bandwidth combined with service redundancy also reduces the susceptibility to denial-of-service events.
## What to Check
- [ ] Verify SC-5 Denial-of-service Protection is documented in SSP
- [ ] Validate all 2 control requirements are implemented
- [ ] Confirm control is operating effectively
- [ ] Review evidence of continuous monitoring for SC-5
## How to Test
### Step 1: Review Documentation
Examine the System Security Plan (SSP) and related artifacts for SC-5 implementation details. Verify the organization has documented how this control is satisfied.
### Step 2: Validate Implementation
```
# For cloud environments, use cloud-audit-mcp tools
# For on-premises, review system configurations directly
# Example: Check if account management policies exist
grep -r "account.management\|access.control" /etc/security/ 2>/dev/null
```
### Step 3: Test Operating Effectiveness
Verify the control is actively functioning, not just documented. Check logs, configurations, and operational evidence.
## Tools
| Tool | Purpose | Usage |
| --------------- | ------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------ |
| cloud-audit-mcp | Check encryption and network controls | `cloud_audit_encryption` |
| nmap | Network scanning | `nmap -sV --script ssl-enum-ciphers` |
## Remediation Guide
### Control Statement
[organization-defined] the effects of the following types of denial-of-service events: [organization-defined] ; and
Employ the following controls to achieve the denial-of-service objective: [organization-defined].
### Implementation Guidance
Denial-of-service events may occur due to a variety of internal and external causes, such as an attack by an adversary or a lack of planning to support organizational needs with respect to capacity and bandwidth. Such attacks can occur across a wide range of network protocols (e.g., IPv4, IPv6). A variety of technologies are available to limit or eliminate the origination and effects of denial-of-service events. For example, boundary protection devices can filter certain types of packets to protect system components on internal networks from being directly affected by or the source of denial-of-service attacks. Employing increased network capacity and bandwidth combined with service redundancy also reduces the susceptibility to denial-of-service events.
## Risk Assessment
| Finding | Severity | Impact |
| ------------------------------------------------- | -------- | ----------------------------------------------- |
| SC-5 Denial-of-service Protection not implemented | High | System and Communications Protection |
| SC-5 partially implemented | Medium | Incomplete System and Communications Protection |
## CWE Categories
| CWE ID | Title |
| ------- | ------------------------------------ |
| CWE-311 | Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data |
## References
- [NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 - SC-5](https://csrc.nist.gov/projects/cprt/catalog#/cprt/framework/version/SP_800_53_5_1_1/home?element=sc-5)
- [NIST SP 800-53A Rev 5 (Assessment Procedures)](https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/sp/800/53/a/r5/final)
- [NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 Full Catalog](https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/sp/800/53/r5/upd1/final)
## Checklist
- [ ] Control documented in SSP
- [ ] Implementation evidence collected
- [ ] Operating effectiveness validated
- [ ] Continuous monitoring in place
- [ ] Related controls (CP-2, IR-4, SC-6, SC-7, SC-40) reviewed