Compare the results of multiple vulnerability scans using [organization-defined].
Scanned 9/3/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add CyberStrikeus/CyberStrike --skill RA-5(6)_automated-trend-analyses --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of RA 5(6) Automated Trend Analyses?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/cyberstrikeus-ra-5-6-automated-trend-analyses)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: "RA-5(6)_automated-trend-analyses"
description: "Compare the results of multiple vulnerability scans using [organization-defined]."
category: "information-gathering"
version: "5.2.0"
author: "cyberstrike-official"
tags:
- nist
- sp800-53
- rev5
- ra-5-6
- ra
- enhancement
tech_stack:
- any
cwe_ids: []
chains_with: []
prerequisites:
- RA-5
severity_boost: {}
---
# RA-5(6) Automated Trend Analyses
> **Enhancement of:** RA-5
## High-Level Description
**Family:** Risk Assessment (RA)
**Framework:** NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5
Using automated mechanisms to analyze multiple vulnerability scans over time can help determine trends in system vulnerabilities and identify patterns of attack.
## What to Check
- [ ] Verify RA-5(6) Automated Trend Analyses is documented in SSP
- [ ] Confirm control is operating effectively
- [ ] Review evidence of continuous monitoring for RA-5(6)
- [ ] Verify enhancement builds upon base control RA-5
## How to Test
### Step 1: Review Documentation
Examine the System Security Plan (SSP) and related artifacts for RA-5(6) implementation details. Verify the organization has documented how this control is satisfied.
### Step 2: Validate Implementation
```
# For cloud environments, use cloud-audit-mcp tools
# For on-premises, review system configurations directly
# Example: Check if account management policies exist
grep -r "account.management\|access.control" /etc/security/ 2>/dev/null
```
### Step 3: Test Operating Effectiveness
Verify the control is actively functioning, not just documented. Check logs, configurations, and operational evidence.
## Tools
| Tool | Purpose | Usage |
| ------------- | --------------------------------- | ----- |
| Manual Review | Documentation and interview-based | N/A |
## Remediation Guide
### Control Statement
Compare the results of multiple vulnerability scans using [organization-defined].
### Implementation Guidance
Using automated mechanisms to analyze multiple vulnerability scans over time can help determine trends in system vulnerabilities and identify patterns of attack.
## Risk Assessment
| Finding | Severity | Impact |
| ------------------------------------------------ | -------- | -------------------------- |
| RA-5(6) Automated Trend Analyses not implemented | Medium | Risk Assessment |
| RA-5(6) partially implemented | Low | Incomplete Risk Assessment |
## CWE Categories
| CWE ID | Title |
| ------ | --------------------- |
| N/A | No direct CWE mapping |
## References
- [NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 - RA-5(6)](https://csrc.nist.gov/projects/cprt/catalog#/cprt/framework/version/SP_800_53_5_1_1/home?element=ra-5.6)
- [NIST SP 800-53A Rev 5 (Assessment Procedures)](https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/sp/800/53/a/r5/final)
- [NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 Full Catalog](https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/sp/800/53/r5/upd1/final)
## Checklist
- [ ] Control documented in SSP
- [ ] Implementation evidence collected
- [ ] Operating effectiveness validated
- [ ] Continuous monitoring in place
- [ ] Related controls (none) reviewed
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!