Back to skills
SKILL.md
RA 5(6) Automated Trend Analyses
ASecurityCompare the results of multiple vulnerability scans using [organization-defined].
- 3,518 stars
- 0 votes
- 0 copies
- 3 views
- Added September 3, 2026
Works with
Security analysis
100/100npx -y skills add CyberStrikeus/CyberStrike --skill 'RA-5(6)_automated-trend-analyses' --agent claude-codeAre you the author of RA 5(6) Automated Trend Analyses?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/cyberstrikeus-ra-5-6-automated-trend-analyses)---
name: "RA-5(6)_automated-trend-analyses"
description: "Compare the results of multiple vulnerability scans using [organization-defined]."
category: "information-gathering"
version: "5.2.0"
author: "cyberstrike-official"
tags:
- nist
- sp800-53
- rev5
- ra-5-6
- ra
- enhancement
tech_stack:
- any
cwe_ids: []
chains_with: []
prerequisites:
- RA-5
severity_boost: {}
---
# RA-5(6) Automated Trend Analyses
> **Enhancement of:** RA-5
## High-Level Description
**Family:** Risk Assessment (RA)
**Framework:** NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5
Using automated mechanisms to analyze multiple vulnerability scans over time can help determine trends in system vulnerabilities and identify patterns of attack.
## What to Check
- [ ] Verify RA-5(6) Automated Trend Analyses is documented in SSP
- [ ] Confirm control is operating effectively
- [ ] Review evidence of continuous monitoring for RA-5(6)
- [ ] Verify enhancement builds upon base control RA-5
## How to Test
### Step 1: Review Documentation
Examine the System Security Plan (SSP) and related artifacts for RA-5(6) implementation details. Verify the organization has documented how this control is satisfied.
### Step 2: Validate Implementation
```
# For cloud environments, use cloud-audit-mcp tools
# For on-premises, review system configurations directly
# Example: Check if account management policies exist
grep -r "account.management\|access.control" /etc/security/ 2>/dev/null
```
### Step 3: Test Operating Effectiveness
Verify the control is actively functioning, not just documented. Check logs, configurations, and operational evidence.
## Tools
| Tool | Purpose | Usage |
| ------------- | --------------------------------- | ----- |
| Manual Review | Documentation and interview-based | N/A |
## Remediation Guide
### Control Statement
Compare the results of multiple vulnerability scans using [organization-defined].
### Implementation Guidance
Using automated mechanisms to analyze multiple vulnerability scans over time can help determine trends in system vulnerabilities and identify patterns of attack.
## Risk Assessment
| Finding | Severity | Impact |
| ------------------------------------------------ | -------- | -------------------------- |
| RA-5(6) Automated Trend Analyses not implemented | Medium | Risk Assessment |
| RA-5(6) partially implemented | Low | Incomplete Risk Assessment |
## CWE Categories
| CWE ID | Title |
| ------ | --------------------- |
| N/A | No direct CWE mapping |
## References
- [NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 - RA-5(6)](https://csrc.nist.gov/projects/cprt/catalog#/cprt/framework/version/SP_800_53_5_1_1/home?element=ra-5.6)
- [NIST SP 800-53A Rev 5 (Assessment Procedures)](https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/sp/800/53/a/r5/final)
- [NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 Full Catalog](https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/sp/800/53/r5/upd1/final)
## Checklist
- [ ] Control documented in SSP
- [ ] Implementation evidence collected
- [ ] Operating effectiveness validated
- [ ] Continuous monitoring in place
- [ ] Related controls (none) reviewed
Attribution
Related skills
View all in security →Comments
Loading comments…
Newsletter
Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.