Correlate the output from vulnerability scanning tools to determine the presence of multi-vulnerability and multi-hop attack vectors.
Scanned 9/3/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add CyberStrikeus/CyberStrike --skill RA-5(10)_correlate-scanning-information --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of RA 5(10) Correlate Scanning Information?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/cyberstrikeus-ra-5-10-correlate-scanning-information)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: "RA-5(10)_correlate-scanning-information"
description: "Correlate the output from vulnerability scanning tools to determine the presence of multi-vulnerability and multi-hop attack vectors."
category: "information-gathering"
version: "5.2.0"
author: "cyberstrike-official"
tags:
- nist
- sp800-53
- rev5
- ra-5-10
- ra
- enhancement
tech_stack:
- any
cwe_ids: []
chains_with: []
prerequisites:
- RA-5
severity_boost: {}
---
# RA-5(10) Correlate Scanning Information
> **Enhancement of:** RA-5
## High-Level Description
**Family:** Risk Assessment (RA)
**Framework:** NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5
An attack vector is a path or means by which an adversary can gain access to a system in order to deliver malicious code or exfiltrate information. Organizations can use attack trees to show how hostile activities by adversaries interact and combine to produce adverse impacts or negative consequences to systems and organizations. Such information, together with correlated data from vulnerability scanning tools, can provide greater clarity regarding multi-vulnerability and multi-hop attack vectors. The correlation of vulnerability scanning information is especially important when organizations are transitioning from older technologies to newer technologies (e.g., transitioning from IPv4 to IPv6 network protocols). During such transitions, some system components may inadvertently be unmanaged and create opportunities for adversary exploitation.
## What to Check
- [ ] Verify RA-5(10) Correlate Scanning Information is documented in SSP
- [ ] Confirm control is operating effectively
- [ ] Review evidence of continuous monitoring for RA-5(10)
- [ ] Verify enhancement builds upon base control RA-5
## How to Test
### Step 1: Review Documentation
Examine the System Security Plan (SSP) and related artifacts for RA-5(10) implementation details. Verify the organization has documented how this control is satisfied.
### Step 2: Validate Implementation
```
# For cloud environments, use cloud-audit-mcp tools
# For on-premises, review system configurations directly
# Example: Check if account management policies exist
grep -r "account.management\|access.control" /etc/security/ 2>/dev/null
```
### Step 3: Test Operating Effectiveness
Verify the control is actively functioning, not just documented. Check logs, configurations, and operational evidence.
## Tools
| Tool | Purpose | Usage |
| ------------- | --------------------------------- | ----- |
| Manual Review | Documentation and interview-based | N/A |
## Remediation Guide
### Control Statement
Correlate the output from vulnerability scanning tools to determine the presence of multi-vulnerability and multi-hop attack vectors.
### Implementation Guidance
An attack vector is a path or means by which an adversary can gain access to a system in order to deliver malicious code or exfiltrate information. Organizations can use attack trees to show how hostile activities by adversaries interact and combine to produce adverse impacts or negative consequences to systems and organizations. Such information, together with correlated data from vulnerability scanning tools, can provide greater clarity regarding multi-vulnerability and multi-hop attack vectors. The correlation of vulnerability scanning information is especially important when organizations are transitioning from older technologies to newer technologies (e.g., transitioning from IPv4 to IPv6 network protocols). During such transitions, some system components may inadvertently be unmanaged and create opportunities for adversary exploitation.
## Risk Assessment
| Finding | Severity | Impact |
| ------------------------------------------------------- | -------- | -------------------------- |
| RA-5(10) Correlate Scanning Information not implemented | Medium | Risk Assessment |
| RA-5(10) partially implemented | Low | Incomplete Risk Assessment |
## CWE Categories
| CWE ID | Title |
| ------ | --------------------- |
| N/A | No direct CWE mapping |
## References
- [NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 - RA-5(10)](https://csrc.nist.gov/projects/cprt/catalog#/cprt/framework/version/SP_800_53_5_1_1/home?element=ra-5.10)
- [NIST SP 800-53A Rev 5 (Assessment Procedures)](https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/sp/800/53/a/r5/final)
- [NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 Full Catalog](https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/sp/800/53/r5/upd1/final)
## Checklist
- [ ] Control documented in SSP
- [ ] Implementation evidence collected
- [ ] Operating effectiveness validated
- [ ] Continuous monitoring in place
- [ ] Related controls (none) reviewed
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!