Determine whether code review (a person looks directly at the code to find issues) and/or code analysis (tools are used to find issues in code, either
Scanned 9/3/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add CyberStrikeus/CyberStrike --skill PW.7.1_pw71 --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of PW.7.1 Pw71?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/cyberstrikeus-pw-7-1-pw71)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: "PW.7.1_pw71"
description: "Determine whether code review (a person looks directly at the code to find issues) and/or code analysis (tools are used to find issues in code, either"
category: "input-validation"
version: "1.1"
author: "cyberstrike-official"
tags:
- nist
- sp800-218
- ssdf
- pw-7-1
- pw
- secure-development
- task
tech_stack:
- any
cwe_ids:
- CWE-20
chains_with: []
prerequisites:
- Review and/or Analyze Human-Readable Code to Identify Vulnerabilities and Verify Compliance with Security Requirements (PW.7)
severity_boost: {}
---
# PW.7.1 PW.7.1
> **Task of practice:** Review and/or Analyze Human-Readable Code to Identify Vulnerabilities and Verify Compliance with Security Requirements (PW.7)
## High-Level Description
**Practice Group:** Produce Well-Secured Software (PW)
**Framework:** NIST SP 800-218 SSDF v1.1
Determine whether code review (a person looks directly at the code to find issues) and/or code analysis (tools are used to find issues in code, either in a fully automated way or in conjunction with a person) should be used, as defined by the organization.
## What to Check
- [ ] Verify PW.7.1 PW.7.1 is integrated into SDLC
- [ ] Review CI/CD pipeline for PW.7.1 implementation
- [ ] Confirm automated tooling supports this practice
## How to Test
### Step 1: Review SDLC Documentation
Examine development lifecycle documentation for evidence of PW.7.1 practice implementation.
### Step 2: Verify Tooling
```
# Check CI/CD pipeline configuration
# Verify security tools are integrated
# Example: Check for SAST/DAST in pipeline
grep -r "security\|scan\|sast\|dast" .github/workflows/ 2>/dev/null
grep -r "security\|scan" Jenkinsfile 2>/dev/null
```
### Step 3: Assess Developer Awareness
Verify development team understands and follows PW.7.1 PW.7.1 practice.
## Tools
| Tool | Purpose | Usage |
| ------------------- | ---------------------------------- | ---------------------------- |
| github-security-mcp | Check repository security settings | `github_security_*` tools |
| Manual Review | SDLC process review | Documentation and interviews |
## Remediation Guide
Implement PW.7.1 PW.7.1 in the software development lifecycle:
Determine whether code review (a person looks directly at the code to find issues) and/or code analysis (tools are used to find issues in code, either in a fully automated way or in conjunction with a person) should be used, as defined by the organization.
## Risk Assessment
| Finding | Severity | Impact |
| ----------------------------- | -------- | -------------------------------------------------- |
| PW.7.1 PW.7.1 not implemented | Medium | Secure Development - Produce Well-Secured Software |
## CWE Categories
| CWE ID | Title |
| ------ | ------------------------- |
| CWE-20 | Improper Input Validation |
## References
- [NIST SP 800-218 SSDF v1.1](https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/sp/800/218/final)
- [NIST SSDF Practices](https://csrc.nist.gov/projects/ssdf)
- [NIST OSCAL Content](https://github.com/usnistgov/oscal-content)
## Checklist
- [ ] Practice documented in SDLC policy
- [ ] Tooling configured and operational
- [ ] Development team trained
- [ ] Evidence of consistent application
- [ ] Periodic review scheduled
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!