Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Pm 16 1 Automated Means For Sharing?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/cyberstrikeus-pm-16-1-automated-means-for-sharing)
---
name: "PM-16(1)_automated-means-for-sharing-threat-intelligence"
description: "Employ automated mechanisms to maximize the effectiveness of sharing threat intelligence information."
category: "configuration"
version: "5.2.0"
author: "cyberstrike-official"
tags:
- nist
- sp800-53
- rev5
- pm-16-1
- pm
- enhancement
tech_stack:
- any
cwe_ids: []
chains_with: []
prerequisites:
- PM-16
severity_boost: {}
---
# PM-16(1) Automated Means for Sharing Threat Intelligence
> **Enhancement of:** PM-16
## High-Level Description
**Family:** Program Management (PM)
**Framework:** NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5
To maximize the effectiveness of monitoring, it is important to know what threat observables and indicators the sensors need to be searching for. By using well-established frameworks, services, and automated tools, organizations improve their ability to rapidly share and feed the relevant threat detection signatures into monitoring tools.
## What to Check
- [ ] Verify PM-16(1) Automated Means for Sharing Threat Intelligence is documented in SSP
- [ ] Confirm control is operating effectively
- [ ] Review evidence of continuous monitoring for PM-16(1)
- [ ] Verify enhancement builds upon base control PM-16
## How to Test
### Step 1: Review Documentation
Examine the System Security Plan (SSP) and related artifacts for PM-16(1) implementation details. Verify the organization has documented how this control is satisfied.
### Step 2: Validate Implementation
```
# For cloud environments, use cloud-audit-mcp tools
# For on-premises, review system configurations directly
# Example: Check if account management policies exist
grep -r "account.management\|access.control" /etc/security/ 2>/dev/null
```
### Step 3: Test Operating Effectiveness
Verify the control is actively functioning, not just documented. Check logs, configurations, and operational evidence.
## Tools
| Tool | Purpose | Usage |
| ------------- | --------------------------------- | ----- |
| Manual Review | Documentation and interview-based | N/A |
## Remediation Guide
### Control Statement
Employ automated mechanisms to maximize the effectiveness of sharing threat intelligence information.
### Implementation Guidance
To maximize the effectiveness of monitoring, it is important to know what threat observables and indicators the sensors need to be searching for. By using well-established frameworks, services, and automated tools, organizations improve their ability to rapidly share and feed the relevant threat detection signatures into monitoring tools.
## Risk Assessment
| Finding | Severity | Impact |
| ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -------- | ----------------------------- |
| PM-16(1) Automated Means for Sharing Threat Intelligence not implemented | Medium | Program Management |
| PM-16(1) partially implemented | Low | Incomplete Program Management |
## CWE Categories
| CWE ID | Title |
| ------ | --------------------- |
| N/A | No direct CWE mapping |
## References
- [NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 - PM-16(1)](https://csrc.nist.gov/projects/cprt/catalog#/cprt/framework/version/SP_800_53_5_1_1/home?element=pm-16.1)
- [NIST SP 800-53A Rev 5 (Assessment Procedures)](https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/sp/800/53/a/r5/final)
- [NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 Full Catalog](https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/sp/800/53/r5/upd1/final)
## Checklist
- [ ] Control documented in SSP
- [ ] Implementation evidence collected
- [ ] Operating effectiveness validated
- [ ] Continuous monitoring in place
- [ ] Related controls (none) reviewed