Skip to content
Back to skills

Maintenance (PR.MA) Maintenance

ASecurity

Maintenance

  • 2,182 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 3 views
  • Added May 30, 2026
securitygoawsgcpazuresecuritydocumentation

Works with

  • mcp

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned May 30, 2026

npx -y skills add CyberStrikeus/CyberStrike --skill 'Maintenance (PR.MA)_maintenance' --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Maintenance (PR.MA) Maintenance?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Maintenance (PR.MA) Maintenance
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/cyberstrikeus-maintenance-pr-ma-maintenance/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/cyberstrikeus-maintenance-pr-ma-maintenance)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: "Maintenance (PR.MA)_maintenance"
description: "Maintenance"
category: "authorization"
version: "2.0"
author: "cyberstrike-official"
tags:
  - nist
  - csf
  - v2.0
  - maintenance (pr-ma)
  - pr
  - category
tech_stack:
  - aws
  - azure
  - gcp
  - linux
  - windows
cwe_ids:
  - CWE-284
chains_with: []
prerequisites: []
severity_boost: {}
---

# Maintenance (PR.MA) Maintenance

## High-Level Description

**Function:** PROTECT (PR)
**Framework:** NIST Cybersecurity Framework v2.0

Maintenance

## What to Check

- [ ] Verify Maintenance (PR.MA) Maintenance outcome is achieved
- [ ] Review documentation and evidence for Maintenance (PR.MA)
- [ ] Assess organizational maturity for PROTECT function

## How to Test

### Step 1: Identify Current Profile

Determine the organization's current and target CSF profile tier for Maintenance (PR.MA).

### Step 2: Assess Outcome Achievement

```
# Review organizational policies and procedures
# Check for evidence that Maintenance (PR.MA) outcome is met
# Interview stakeholders responsible for PROTECT
```

### Step 3: Map to Technical Controls

Identify which SP 800-53 controls implement this CSF outcome and verify their operating effectiveness.

## Tools

| Tool            | Purpose                       | Usage                        |
| --------------- | ----------------------------- | ---------------------------- |
| cloud-audit-mcp | Assess cloud security posture | `cloud_audit_*` tools        |
| Manual Review   | Policy and procedure review   | Interviews and documentation |

## Remediation Guide

Achieve the Maintenance (PR.MA) Maintenance outcome:

Implement controls that satisfy the Maintenance outcome per NIST CSF v2.0.

## Risk Assessment

| Finding                                              | Severity | Impact               |
| ---------------------------------------------------- | -------- | -------------------- |
| Maintenance (PR.MA) Maintenance outcome not achieved | High     | PROTECT Function Gap |

## CWE Categories

| CWE ID  | Title                   |
| ------- | ----------------------- |
| CWE-284 | Improper Access Control |

## References

- [NIST CSF v2.0](https://www.nist.gov/cyberframework)
- [NIST CSF v2.0 Reference Tool](https://csrc.nist.gov/projects/cybersecurity-framework/filters#/csf/filters)
- [CSF 2.0 Quick Start Guides](https://www.nist.gov/cyberframework/getting-started)

## Checklist

- [ ] Current profile tier assessed
- [ ] Target profile tier defined
- [ ] Gap analysis completed
- [ ] SP 800-53 control mapping verified
- [ ] Implementation roadmap exists

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.