Transfer predictive maintenance data to a maintenance management system using [organization-defined].
Scanned 9/3/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add CyberStrikeus/CyberStrike --skill ma-6-3-automated-support-for-predictive --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Ma 6 3 Automated Support For Predictive?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/cyberstrikeus-ma-6-3-automated-support-for-predictive)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: "MA-6(3)_automated-support-for-predictive-maintenance"
description: "Transfer predictive maintenance data to a maintenance management system using [organization-defined]."
category: "configuration"
version: "5.2.0"
author: "cyberstrike-official"
tags:
- nist
- sp800-53
- rev5
- ma-6-3
- ma
- enhancement
tech_stack:
- linux
- windows
cwe_ids: []
chains_with: []
prerequisites:
- MA-6
severity_boost: {}
---
# MA-6(3) Automated Support for Predictive Maintenance
> **Enhancement of:** MA-6
## High-Level Description
**Family:** Maintenance (MA)
**Framework:** NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5
A computerized maintenance management system maintains a database of information about the maintenance operations of organizations and automates the processing of equipment condition data to trigger maintenance planning, execution, and reporting.
## What to Check
- [ ] Verify MA-6(3) Automated Support for Predictive Maintenance is documented in SSP
- [ ] Confirm control is operating effectively
- [ ] Review evidence of continuous monitoring for MA-6(3)
- [ ] Verify enhancement builds upon base control MA-6
## How to Test
### Step 1: Review Documentation
Examine the System Security Plan (SSP) and related artifacts for MA-6(3) implementation details. Verify the organization has documented how this control is satisfied.
### Step 2: Validate Implementation
```
# For cloud environments, use cloud-audit-mcp tools
# For on-premises, review system configurations directly
# Example: Check if account management policies exist
grep -r "account.management\|access.control" /etc/security/ 2>/dev/null
```
### Step 3: Test Operating Effectiveness
Verify the control is actively functioning, not just documented. Check logs, configurations, and operational evidence.
## Tools
| Tool | Purpose | Usage |
| ------------- | --------------------------------- | ----- |
| Manual Review | Documentation and interview-based | N/A |
## Remediation Guide
### Control Statement
Transfer predictive maintenance data to a maintenance management system using [organization-defined].
### Implementation Guidance
A computerized maintenance management system maintains a database of information about the maintenance operations of organizations and automates the processing of equipment condition data to trigger maintenance planning, execution, and reporting.
## Risk Assessment
| Finding | Severity | Impact |
| -------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------- | ---------------------- |
| MA-6(3) Automated Support for Predictive Maintenance not implemented | Medium | Maintenance |
| MA-6(3) partially implemented | Low | Incomplete Maintenance |
## CWE Categories
| CWE ID | Title |
| ------ | --------------------- |
| N/A | No direct CWE mapping |
## References
- [NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 - MA-6(3)](https://csrc.nist.gov/projects/cprt/catalog#/cprt/framework/version/SP_800_53_5_1_1/home?element=ma-6.3)
- [NIST SP 800-53A Rev 5 (Assessment Procedures)](https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/sp/800/53/a/r5/final)
- [NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 Full Catalog](https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/sp/800/53/r5/upd1/final)
## Checklist
- [ ] Control documented in SSP
- [ ] Implementation evidence collected
- [ ] Operating effectiveness validated
- [ ] Continuous monitoring in place
- [ ] Related controls (none) reviewed
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!