Plan and prepare for circumstances that preclude returning to the primary processing site.
Scanned 9/3/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add CyberStrikeus/CyberStrike --skill cp-7-6-inability-to-return-to-primary --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Cp 7 6 Inability To Return To Primary?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/cyberstrikeus-cp-7-6-inability-to-return-to-primary)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: "CP-7(6)_inability-to-return-to-primary-site"
description: "Plan and prepare for circumstances that preclude returning to the primary processing site."
category: "configuration"
version: "5.2.0"
author: "cyberstrike-official"
tags:
- nist
- sp800-53
- rev5
- cp-7-6
- cp
- enhancement
tech_stack:
- aws
- azure
- gcp
cwe_ids: []
chains_with: []
prerequisites:
- CP-7
severity_boost: {}
---
# CP-7(6) Inability to Return to Primary Site
> **Enhancement of:** CP-7
## High-Level Description
**Family:** Contingency Planning (CP)
**Framework:** NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5
There may be situations that preclude an organization from returning to the primary processing site such as if a natural disaster (e.g., flood or a hurricane) damaged or destroyed a facility and it was determined that rebuilding in the same location was not prudent.
## What to Check
- [ ] Verify CP-7(6) Inability to Return to Primary Site is documented in SSP
- [ ] Confirm control is operating effectively
- [ ] Review evidence of continuous monitoring for CP-7(6)
- [ ] Verify enhancement builds upon base control CP-7
## How to Test
### Step 1: Review Documentation
Examine the System Security Plan (SSP) and related artifacts for CP-7(6) implementation details. Verify the organization has documented how this control is satisfied.
### Step 2: Validate Implementation
```
# For cloud environments, use cloud-audit-mcp tools
# For on-premises, review system configurations directly
# Example: Check if account management policies exist
grep -r "account.management\|access.control" /etc/security/ 2>/dev/null
```
### Step 3: Test Operating Effectiveness
Verify the control is actively functioning, not just documented. Check logs, configurations, and operational evidence.
## Tools
| Tool | Purpose | Usage |
| ------------- | --------------------------------- | ----- |
| Manual Review | Documentation and interview-based | N/A |
## Remediation Guide
### Control Statement
Plan and prepare for circumstances that preclude returning to the primary processing site.
### Implementation Guidance
There may be situations that preclude an organization from returning to the primary processing site such as if a natural disaster (e.g., flood or a hurricane) damaged or destroyed a facility and it was determined that rebuilding in the same location was not prudent.
## Risk Assessment
| Finding | Severity | Impact |
| ----------------------------------------------------------- | -------- | ------------------------------- |
| CP-7(6) Inability to Return to Primary Site not implemented | Medium | Contingency Planning |
| CP-7(6) partially implemented | Low | Incomplete Contingency Planning |
## CWE Categories
| CWE ID | Title |
| ------ | --------------------- |
| N/A | No direct CWE mapping |
## References
- [NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 - CP-7(6)](https://csrc.nist.gov/projects/cprt/catalog#/cprt/framework/version/SP_800_53_5_1_1/home?element=cp-7.6)
- [NIST SP 800-53A Rev 5 (Assessment Procedures)](https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/sp/800/53/a/r5/final)
- [NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 Full Catalog](https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/sp/800/53/r5/upd1/final)
## Checklist
- [ ] Control documented in SSP
- [ ] Implementation evidence collected
- [ ] Operating effectiveness validated
- [ ] Continuous monitoring in place
- [ ] Related controls (none) reviewed
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!