Enforce dual authorization for [organization-defined].
Scanned 9/3/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add CyberStrikeus/CyberStrike --skill AC-3(2)_dual-authorization --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of AC 3(2) Dual Authorization?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/cyberstrikeus-ac-3-2-dual-authorization)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: "AC-3(2)_dual-authorization"
description: "Enforce dual authorization for [organization-defined]."
category: "authorization"
version: "5.2.0"
author: "cyberstrike-official"
tags:
- nist
- sp800-53
- rev5
- ac-3-2
- ac
- enhancement
tech_stack:
- aws
- azure
- gcp
- linux
- windows
cwe_ids:
- CWE-284
chains_with:
- CP-9
- MP-6
prerequisites:
- AC-3
severity_boost:
CP-9: "Chain with CP-9 for comprehensive security coverage"
MP-6: "Chain with MP-6 for comprehensive security coverage"
---
# AC-3(2) Dual Authorization
> **Enhancement of:** AC-3
## High-Level Description
**Family:** Access Control (AC)
**Framework:** NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5
Dual authorization, also known as two-person control, reduces risk related to insider threats. Dual authorization mechanisms require the approval of two authorized individuals to execute. To reduce the risk of collusion, organizations consider rotating dual authorization duties. Organizations consider the risk associated with implementing dual authorization mechanisms when immediate responses are necessary to ensure public and environmental safety.
## What to Check
- [ ] Verify AC-3(2) Dual Authorization is documented in SSP
- [ ] Confirm control is operating effectively
- [ ] Review evidence of continuous monitoring for AC-3(2)
- [ ] Verify enhancement builds upon base control AC-3
## How to Test
### Step 1: Review Documentation
Examine the System Security Plan (SSP) and related artifacts for AC-3(2) implementation details. Verify the organization has documented how this control is satisfied.
### Step 2: Validate Implementation
```
# For cloud environments, use cloud-audit-mcp tools
# For on-premises, review system configurations directly
# Example: Check if account management policies exist
grep -r "account.management\|access.control" /etc/security/ 2>/dev/null
```
### Step 3: Test Operating Effectiveness
Verify the control is actively functioning, not just documented. Check logs, configurations, and operational evidence.
## Tools
| Tool | Purpose | Usage |
| --------------- | -------------------------------------- | -------------------------- |
| cloud-audit-mcp | Check IAM policies and access controls | `cloud_audit_iam_policies` |
| hackbrowser | Test web application access controls | `hackbrowser` |
## Remediation Guide
### Control Statement
Enforce dual authorization for [organization-defined].
### Implementation Guidance
Dual authorization, also known as two-person control, reduces risk related to insider threats. Dual authorization mechanisms require the approval of two authorized individuals to execute. To reduce the risk of collusion, organizations consider rotating dual authorization duties. Organizations consider the risk associated with implementing dual authorization mechanisms when immediate responses are necessary to ensure public and environmental safety.
## Risk Assessment
| Finding | Severity | Impact |
| ------------------------------------------ | -------- | ------------------------- |
| AC-3(2) Dual Authorization not implemented | High | Access Control |
| AC-3(2) partially implemented | Medium | Incomplete Access Control |
## CWE Categories
| CWE ID | Title |
| ------- | ----------------------- |
| CWE-284 | Improper Access Control |
## References
- [NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 - AC-3(2)](https://csrc.nist.gov/projects/cprt/catalog#/cprt/framework/version/SP_800_53_5_1_1/home?element=ac-3.2)
- [NIST SP 800-53A Rev 5 (Assessment Procedures)](https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/sp/800/53/a/r5/final)
- [NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 Full Catalog](https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/sp/800/53/r5/upd1/final)
## Checklist
- [ ] Control documented in SSP
- [ ] Implementation evidence collected
- [ ] Operating effectiveness validated
- [ ] Continuous monitoring in place
- [ ] Related controls (CP-9, MP-6) reviewed
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!