Expert code refactoring specialist for improving code quality without changing behavior. Activate on: refactor, code smell, technical debt, legacy code, cleanup, simplify, extract method, extract class, DRY, SOLID principles. NOT for: new feature development (use feature skills), bug fixing (use debugging skills), performance optimization (use performance skills).
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add curiositech/windags-skills --skill refactoring-surgeon --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Refactoring Surgeon?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/curiositech-refactoring-surgeon-windags-skills)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
license: Apache-2.0
name: refactoring-surgeon
description: "Expert code refactoring specialist for improving code quality without changing behavior. Activate on: refactor, code smell, technical debt, legacy code, cleanup, simplify, extract method, extract class, DRY, SOLID principles. NOT for: new feature development (use feature skills), bug fixing (use debugging skills), performance optimization (use performance skills)."
allowed-tools: Read,Write,Edit,Bash(npm test:*,npm run lint:*,git:*)
category: Code Quality & Testing
tags:
- refactoring
- code-smells
- solid
- dry
- cleanup
pairs-with:
- skill: code-necromancer
reason: Refactor resurrected legacy code
- skill: test-automation-expert
reason: Tests before refactoring
---
# Refactoring Surgeon
Expert code refactoring specialist focused on improving code quality without changing behavior.
## Quick Start
1. **Ensure tests exist** - Never refactor without a safety net
2. **Identify the smell** - Name the specific code smell you're addressing
3. **Make small changes** - One refactoring at a time, commit frequently
4. **Run tests after each change** - Behavior must remain identical
5. **Don't add features** - Refactoring ≠ enhancement
6. **Document significant changes** - Explain the "why" for future maintainers
## Core Capabilities
| Category | Techniques |
|----------|------------|
| **Extraction** | Extract Method, Extract Class, Extract Interface |
| **Movement** | Move Method, Move Field, Inline Method |
| **Simplification** | Replace Conditional with Polymorphism, Decompose Conditional |
| **Organization** | Introduce Parameter Object, Replace Magic Numbers |
| **Legacy Migration** | Strangler Fig, Branch by Abstraction, Parallel Change |
## Code Smells Reference
### Bloaters
```
┌─────────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────────┐
│ Long Method │ │ Large Class │ │ Long Parameter │
│ > 20 lines? │ │ > 200 lines? │ │ List │
│ → Extract Method │ │ → Extract Class │ │ → Parameter Object │
└─────────────────────┘ └─────────────────────┘ └─────────────────────┘
```
### OO Abusers
```
┌─────────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────────┐
│ Switch Statements │ │ Refused Bequest │ │ Parallel │
│ Type-checking? │ │ Unused inheritance?│ │ Hierarchies │
│ → Polymorphism │ │ → Delegation │ │ → Move Method │
└─────────────────────┘ └─────────────────────┘ └─────────────────────┘
```
### Change Preventers
```
┌─────────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────────┐
│ Divergent Change │ │ Shotgun Surgery │
│ One class, many │ │ One change, many │
│ reasons to change? │ │ classes affected? │
│ → Extract Class │ │ → Move/Inline │
└─────────────────────┘ └─────────────────────┘
```
## Reference Examples
Complete refactoring examples in `./references/`:
| File | Pattern | Use Case |
|------|---------|----------|
| `extract-method.ts` | Extract Method | Long methods → focused functions |
| `replace-conditional-polymorphism.ts` | Replace Conditional | switch/if → polymorphic classes |
| `introduce-parameter-object.ts` | Parameter Object | Long params → structured objects |
| `strangler-fig-pattern.ts` | Strangler Fig | Legacy code → gradual migration |
## Anti-Patterns (10 Critical Mistakes)
### 1. Big Bang Refactoring
**Symptom**: Rewriting entire modules in one massive change
**Fix**: Strangler fig pattern, small incremental changes with tests
### 2. Refactoring Without Tests
**Symptom**: Changing structure without test coverage
**Fix**: Write characterization tests first, add coverage for affected areas
### 3. Premature Abstraction
**Symptom**: Creating generic frameworks "for future flexibility"
**Fix**: Wait for three concrete examples before abstracting (Rule of Three)
### 4. Renaming Without IDE Support
**Symptom**: Find-and-replace that misses occurrences
**Fix**: Use IDE refactoring tools, search for usages first
### 5. Mixing Refactoring and Features
**Symptom**: Adding new functionality while restructuring
**Fix**: Separate commits - refactor first, then add features
### 6. Ignoring Code Reviews
**Symptom**: Large refactoring PRs that are hard to review
**Fix**: Small, focused PRs with clear commit messages
### 7. Over-Abstracting
**Symptom**: Three layers of abstraction for a simple operation
**Fix**: YAGNI - start concrete, abstract when patterns emerge
### 8. Incomplete Refactoring
**Symptom**: Starting Extract Method but leaving partial duplication
**Fix**: Complete the refactoring or revert - no half-measures
### 9. Refactoring Production During Incidents
**Symptom**: "I'll just clean this up while I'm here..."
**Fix**: Never refactor during incidents - fix the bug, create a ticket
### 10. Not Measuring Improvement
**Symptom**: Refactoring without knowing if it helped
**Fix**: Track metrics: complexity, test coverage, build time
## Safety Checklist
**Before Refactoring:**
- [ ] Code compiles/runs successfully
- [ ] All tests pass
- [ ] Test coverage is adequate for area being refactored
- [ ] Commit current state (can rollback)
**During Refactoring:**
- [ ] Make small, incremental changes
- [ ] Run tests after each change
- [ ] Keep behavior identical
- [ ] Don't add features while refactoring
**After Refactoring:**
- [ ] All tests still pass
- [ ] No new warnings/errors
- [ ] Code is more readable
- [ ] Complexity metrics improved
- [ ] Document significant changes
## Quality Checklist
- [ ] No behavior changes (tests prove this)
- [ ] Improved readability
- [ ] Reduced complexity (cyclomatic, cognitive)
- [ ] Better adherence to SOLID principles
- [ ] Removed duplication (DRY)
- [ ] More testable code
- [ ] Clear naming
- [ ] Appropriate abstractions (not over-engineered)
## Validation Script
Run `./scripts/validate-refactoring.sh` to check:
- Test coverage presence
- Code smell indicators
- Duplication patterns
- Complexity metrics
- SOLID violations
- Refactoring safety (git, uncommitted changes)
## External Resources
- [Refactoring.Guru](https://refactoring.guru/)
- [Martin Fowler's Refactoring Catalog](https://refactoring.com/catalog/)
- [Working Effectively with Legacy Code](https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/working-effectively-with/0131177052/)
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!