Skip to content
Back to skills

Reliability

ASecurity

Relivaro reliability and resilience analysis — timeouts, swallowed errors, idempotency of payments, race conditions on balances and counters, retry policies, destructive or irreversible migrations, graceful shutdown, health checks and error monitoring.

  • 4 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added November 7, 2026
developmentbashnode

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned November 7, 2026

npx -y skills add cihantopac/relivaro --skill reliability --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Reliability?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Reliability
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/cihantopac-reliability/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/cihantopac-reliability)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---

name: reliability
description: Relivaro reliability and resilience analysis — timeouts, swallowed errors, idempotency of payments, race conditions on balances and counters, retry policies, destructive or irreversible migrations, graceful shutdown, health checks and error monitoring.
argument-hint: "[path]"
allowed-tools: Bash(node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/dist/relivaro.mjs" *) Bash(node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/dist/relivaro.mjs *) Read Grep Glob
---

# Relivaro · Reliability

Request: $ARGUMENTS

Toolchain and rules as in `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/relivaro/SKILL.md`.

1. `relivaro reliability <path> --json --compact`.
2. Verify findings in code. For each, describe the failure scenario concretely (what fails, what the user sees,
   what data could be lost or duplicated) — only when the code supports it.
3. Migrations: for destructive steps, check whether the release plan includes a backup and an expand/contract
   sequence; flag irreversible steps without `down()`.
4. Review what static rules cannot see when relevant: external calls without retries/backoff, queue consumers
   without dead-letter handling, webhook handlers without idempotency, transactions spanning network calls — always
   with file:line evidence, labelled as your review findings.
5. Answer with confirmed risks ordered by blast radius, the recommended minimal fix for each, and how to verify it
   (a test or a controlled failure experiment).
6. Use the **Final response** format of the main skill (80–150 words) for that answer; record verdicts with
   `relivaro review add` so the report shows them. Details stay in the report.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.