Skip to content
Back to skills

Onboard

ASecurity

Generate a structured orientation for a codebase. Reads the project, memory, and conventions to produce a mental model: architecture, key entry points, data flow, and known gotchas. Use when joining a project, returning after time away, or onboarding a new contributor. Trigger this when someone says: orient me, explain this codebase, how does this project work, I am new here, give me an overview, help me understand the architecture, catch me up. Do NOT use to document conventions — use /conve...

  • 7 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added October 13, 2026
developmentgotestinggitapidatabasefrontenddocumentation

Works with

  • cli
  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned October 13, 2026

npx -y skills add chuckplayer/claude-agent-pack --skill onboard --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Onboard?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Onboard
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/chuckplayer-onboard/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/chuckplayer-onboard)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: onboard
description: "Generate a structured orientation for a codebase. Reads the project, memory, and conventions to produce a mental model: architecture, key entry points, data flow, and known gotchas. Use when joining a project, returning after time away, or onboarding a new contributor. Trigger this when someone says: orient me, explain this codebase, how does this project work, I am new here, give me an overview, help me understand the architecture, catch me up. Do NOT use to document conventions — use /conventions instead. Do NOT use to plan a task — use /plan instead."
---

# Onboard

Produce a structured orientation for this codebase. This skill is read-only — it makes no changes.

## 1. Collect project context

Read the following in parallel:

- `README.md` (or `readme.md`) at the project root
- `docs/CONVENTIONS.md` if it exists
- `CLAUDE.md` at the project root if it exists
- All files in `memory/**/*.md` (skip any with `status: superseded` or `status: archived`)

**If `memory/architecture/repo-map.md` exists**, read it first — it is a cached directory-level map of the codebase. Check its `verified-at-commit` stamp: run `git diff --name-only <that-sha>..HEAD` to see whether the tree has drifted. If it is current, use it as the backbone of the orientation and skip the exhaustive re-exploration in step 2 (spot-check only). If it is stale, note that and recommend `/repo-map refresh`, then fall back to full exploration for the drifted areas.

## 2. Explore the codebase structure

If a current `repo-map.md` covered the structure in step 1, use it instead of re-deriving and move to step 3. Otherwise use Glob and Grep to map the project. Tailor the exploration to what you find — not all projects have all layers:

**Structure:**
- Top-level directories and their apparent purpose
- Solution/project files (`.sln`, `package.json`, `pyproject.toml`, etc.)
- Key configuration files (`appsettings.json`, `.env.example`, `vite.config.ts`, etc.)

**Entry points:**
- API controllers or route definitions
- Background jobs or scheduled tasks
- Frontend pages or top-level components
- Main program entry point

**Data layer:**
- Database context or ORM configuration
- Migration files (count and rough date range)
- Key entities or models

**Frontend (if present):**
- Component structure
- State management (stores, composables)
- API client layer

## 3. Identify key patterns

From what you've read, identify:
- The architectural style (layered, CQRS, modular monolith, microservices, etc.)
- Naming conventions actually in use (may differ from CONVENTIONS.md)
- Testing approach (unit, integration, e2e — what framework, where tests live)
- Anything flagged in memory as a known issue or non-obvious constraint

## 4. Produce the orientation document

> **Depth target:** Aim for the level of detail a developer new to this project could use to make their first commit within two hours. If a section would require deep explanation to be useful, flag it in step 5 instead of expanding it here — a pointer to the right file is more useful than an incomplete explanation.

Output a structured orientation using this format:

```
# Project Orientation: <project name>

## What this project does
<1–3 sentences>

## Architecture overview
<Describe the major layers and how they connect. Include a simple text diagram if helpful.>

## Key entry points
<List the most important files a new contributor would need to find first.>

## Data flow
<Trace a representative request or operation from entry point to data store and back.>

## Where to find things
| Concern | Location |
|---------|----------|
| API endpoints | ... |
| Business logic | ... |
| Database models | ... |
| Tests | ... |
| Frontend components | ... |

## Conventions and standards
<Summarize the most important rules from CONVENTIONS.md and memory. Flag any gaps or inconsistencies between documented conventions and actual code.>

## Known gotchas
<List anything from memory/known-issues/ or from code patterns that would surprise a newcomer.>

## Suggested first tasks
<2–3 low-risk starting points for someone new to this codebase.>
```

## 5. Flag gaps

After the orientation, note:
- What you could not determine from reading (e.g., no README, no CONVENTIONS.md, no memory files)
- Any apparent inconsistencies between documentation and actual code
- Areas where a human familiar with the project should fill in missing context

## Gotchas

- **No README or CONVENTIONS.md:** Do not invent documentation. If these files are missing, say so clearly in step 5 and suggest running /setup-project and /conventions to create them. The orientation should reflect what actually exists.
- **Memory files out of sync with code:** Memory records what was true at the time they were written. Always verify a memory claim against the current code before stating it as fact. If a memory file says "we use X" but the code uses Y, report the discrepancy rather than picking one.
- **Depth target mismatch:** The goal is "first commit in two hours," not a comprehensive architecture document. If you find yourself writing three paragraphs about a single module, that's a pointer to a reference file, not inline content. Keep it navigable.
- **This skill is read-only:** Do not create, modify, or delete any files during onboarding. If you identify something that should be documented, recommend /conventions or /memory-audit — do not write it yourself.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.