Skip to content
Back to skills

Specification

ASecurity

Establish requirements, design decisions, interfaces, clocks and constraints from the delivered intent, or revise them after evidence-based clarification; not for implementing RTL or verification.

  • 6 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 3 views
  • Added September 5, 2026
ai-agentspythonbash

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 18 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned September 21, 2026

npx -y skills add chipweaver/veripower --skill specification --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Specification?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Specification
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/chipweaver-specification/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/chipweaver-specification)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: specification
description: Establish requirements, design decisions, interfaces, clocks and constraints from the delivered intent, or revise them after evidence-based clarification; not for implementing RTL or verification.
---

# Specification

Establish the task's requirements and implementation boundary from the original intent. Read
`{workdir}/dispatch.json`; `intent` names the delivered material and its referenced authorities.
Read the evidence needed to resolve a question. Write this stage's artifacts under `{workdir}`.
Author directly or delegate focused work, retaining responsibility for the resulting decisions.

## Establish or revise the definition

Continue from existing artifacts. Use changed inputs, failure records and actual user decisions
to scope work; absence of `caused_by` does not imply a first delivery. Preserve unaffected content
and stable requirement IDs. Read an upstream request's evidence before accepting its attribution.

Produce the requirements ledger using [ledger-task-contract.md](references/ledger-task-contract.md)
and the boundary using [decompose-task-contract.md](references/decompose-task-contract.md).
`design.md` records design choices and joint obligations; the RTL author decides the module split.
The boundary sidecars are `manifest.json`, `clocks.json` and `top-io.json`; their formats are in the
corresponding reference schemas.

Check the ledger:

```bash
python3 <skill>/scripts/spec/__main__.py check-ledger --workdir {workdir}
```

`<skill>` is this skill's directory. The output shows unresolved/unassignable, outside-scope and
rows requiring decisions, plus numerical targets. Resolve these according to the task and actual
authorization. Explain choices requiring a human decision before seeking it; act within an existing
delegation when permitted. Record material decisions and their basis in `spec-review/decisions.md`,
identifying who decided and under what authorization. An agent decision is not a user quotation.

Distinguish a mistaken transcription or design assumption from a proposed change to acceptance.
Correct the former from source evidence. A genuine acceptance change needs authorization and a
clear account of what is no longer being claimed. Neither an approval nor a decision record proves
reachability, physical feasibility or successful verification. Investigate factual questions or
return them to the responsible stage rather than redefining a requirement to make a result pass.

## Complete and review

Use [check-hints-task-contract.md](references/check-hints-task-contract.md) to describe the
observations used by simulation. Check the ledger/boundary/hint references and derive constraints:

```bash
python3 <skill>/scripts/spec/__main__.py check-crossrefs --workdir {workdir}
python3 <skill>/scripts/spec/__main__.py derive-constraints --workdir {workdir}
```

These checks identify inconsistent references and invalid tool inputs; they do not establish the
truth of an engineering assumption. Repair the side that is wrong based on evidence.

Have the complete delivery independently reviewed using
[review-task-contract.md](references/review-task-contract.md). Assess findings against their sources,
repair defects, and recheck affected artifacts. Have substantive changes reassessed. Retain the
review and material decisions; assess acceptance impact independently of a finding's label.
Present `design.md`, review paths and any unresolved decision to the user as needed.

## Close

Finalize when this stage's work is complete or an unresolved issue must return to the caller:

```bash
python3 <skill>/scripts/spec/__main__.py finalize --workdir {workdir} \
  [--fail-reason "<unresolved cause and evidence>"]
```

Finalize checks current references, derives constraints, validates the ledger and rejects unresolved
`unassignable` rows. It does not adjudicate review prose. Supply `--fail-reason` for an unresolved
blocking issue or incomplete review; `stage_specific.fail_reason` carries that cause.

Exit 0 means `result.json` was written, pass or fail; return `STATUS: DONE` and let the caller route
it. A nonzero exit means closure failed; resolve the cause or return `STATUS: BLOCKED <cause>`.

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md8.9 KB
  • references/check-hints.schema.json2.7 KB
  • references/child-design-template.md3.6 KB
  • references/clocks.schema.json1.6 KB
  • references/decompose-task-contract.md2.9 KB
  • references/design-template.md10 KB
  • references/features.schema.json2.4 KB
  • references/interconnects.schema.json2.4 KB
  • references/ppa.schema.json921 B
  • references/result.schema.json2.2 KB
  • references/spec-review-task-contract.md3.5 KB
  • references/top-io.schema.json2.9 KB
  • scripts/spec/__main__.py3.9 KB
  • scripts/spec/constraints.py10.2 KB
  • scripts/spec/crossrefs.py6.5 KB
  • scripts/spec/ports.py4 KB
  • scripts/spec/result.py7.2 KB
  • scripts/spec/sidecar.py6.9 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.