Scaffold or repair the Orient docs system (STATE.md, decisions/, architecture.md) in this repo. Run once per project.
Scanned 8/31/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add Chaitanya299/Orient --skill init --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Init?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/chaitanya299-init)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: init
description: Scaffold or repair the Orient docs system (STATE.md, decisions/, architecture.md) in this repo. Run once per project.
disable-model-invocation: true
---
# /orient:init
Scaffold a small, context-cheap documentation system into this repo, or repair an
existing one. This writes files, so it is user-invoked only and every write is a
proposal the user approves — never a silent write. Show the drafted content before
writing it.
Work through these steps in order.
## 1. Resolve the docs directory
Read `CLAUDE_PLUGIN_OPTION_DOCS_DIR` from the environment. If unset or empty, use
`docs`. Call this `$DOCS_DIR` for the rest of the run. Every path below is relative
to the repo root.
The one artifact every future session depends on is the CLAUDE.md pointer block
(step 6) — it carries the triggers that make decision-capture work. If there's any
chance you won't finish every step, write that block first; the rest of this flow only
refines the docs it points to.
## 2. Detect an existing setup (repair mode)
If `$DOCS_DIR/STATE.md` or `$DOCS_DIR/decisions/` already exists, switch to repair
mode: report what exists, propose only additions, and never overwrite an existing
file. `init` must be safe to run repeatedly.
## 3. Survey the repo with a subagent
Say one line first so the wait is expected, not a suspected hang:
`Surveying the repo (runs in a subagent, ~30-60s on large repos)...`
Then dispatch the `repo-cartographer` agent. Do not read the repo yourself — the
point is that the survey burns the subagent's context window, not this one.
## 4. Draft the core docs
From the survey, draft (do not write yet):
- `$DOCS_DIR/STATE.md` — from the `templates/STATE.md` shape, `## Current focus` first.
Fill the `## Shape` mermaid diagram from the survey: the major components and how they
connect, 6 nodes max. Not a call graph.
- `$DOCS_DIR/architecture.md` — from `templates/architecture.md`: entry points, module
boundaries, the three or four critical paths. Not a call graph, not a file listing.
- `$DOCS_DIR/decisions/0001-record-architecture-decisions.md` — the ADR that establishes
the practice, from `templates/adr.md`.
Never write a secret value into any doc. If the survey surfaced credentials, name the
file, not its contents — these docs get committed and pushed.
## 5. Seed candidate ADRs from git history
Read `git log --oneline -n 200`. Identify commits that look like real architectural
decisions — dependency additions, framework or database choices, auth or API
redesigns, migrations. Draft these as **candidate** ADRs with the commit SHA in the
Context section. Present the candidate list and write only the ones the user approves.
Never bulk-generate ADRs unattended.
## 6. Write the CLAUDE.md block
Use `templates/claude-md-block.md`, substituting `{{DOCS_DIR}}` with `$DOCS_DIR`.
- No `CLAUDE.md` → create it with the block.
- `CLAUDE.md` has both `<!-- ORIENT:START -->` and `<!-- ORIENT:END -->` markers →
replace only the text between them.
- Markers absent → append the block.
- Missing or duplicated end marker, or CRLF line endings → report it and stop rather
than corrupt the file; let the user fix or confirm.
Never touch content outside the markers.
## 7. Offer a path-scoped rule (do not create without a yes)
Offer, but do not create without approval, a starter rule at `.claude/rules/`, showing
the `paths:` frontmatter form so conventions cost nothing until a matching file is
touched. Example to show:
```markdown
---
paths:
- "src/**"
---
Conventions that apply when editing files under src/.
```
## 8. Print a summary
Files created, files skipped (repair mode), and the exact next commands to run.
The whole flow is a proposal the user approves, not a silent write.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!