Skip to content
Back to skills

Cc Rust Project Standard

ASecurity

Use when Rust crate or workspace structure, module boundaries, ownership-facing APIs, Result conventions, Cargo dependencies or engineering checks need design or review.

  • 23 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added November 12, 2026
developmentrustgoapifrontendbackend

Works with

  • cli
  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 10 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned November 12, 2026

npx -y skills add bovinphang/frontend-craft --skill cc-rust-project-standard --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Cc Rust Project Standard?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Cc Rust Project Standard
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/bovinphang-cc-rust-project-standard-frontend-craft/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/bovinphang-cc-rust-project-standard-frontend-craft)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: cc-rust-project-standard
description: "Use when Rust crate or workspace structure, module boundaries, ownership-facing APIs, Result conventions, Cargo dependencies or engineering checks need design or review."
---

# Rust project engineering

Apply to libraries, CLI tools, desktop cores and services. Determine the application role from the actual project; a frontend/backend product name does not constrain the language.

Read Cargo.toml, workspace membership, edition, MSRV and existing aliases before proposing modules or dependencies. Work in the owning crate rather than upgrading the entire workspace.

## Apply the workflow

1. Locate the actual project, task boundary and existing contracts; load only the language and domain material needed now.
2. Apply the [specialist checks](references/practice.md), establishing the input evidence before selecting the smallest change.
3. Verify affected behavior with existing repository tools. Explicitly report missing tools, environments or execution; a plan is not a passing result.
4. Deliver scope, specialist decisions, actual verification and remaining risk. A review-only task stays read-only.

## Task boundary

Existing Tokio cancellation or scheduling defects belong to the async specialty; unrelated frontend structure is outside this scope.

## Engineering practices

Read the [local engineering decisions](references/engineering-practices.md) for this task and follow their links to relevant shared principles. Apply levels and exceptions against actual project contracts; product frontend/backend labels do not constrain language or role.

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md1.6 KB
  • examples/engineering/Cargo.lock173 B
  • examples/engineering/Cargo.toml133 B
  • examples/engineering/README.md1 KB
  • examples/engineering/src/lib.rs1.7 KB
  • references/common/engineering-practices.md12 KB
  • references/common/engineering-practices.rules.json2.2 KB
  • references/common/engineering-practices.sources.json15.9 KB
  • references/engineering-practices.md4.3 KB
  • references/practice.md2 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

View all in development →

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.