Skip to content
Back to skills

Scriptdesign

ASecurity

Script quality advisor for Unity gameplay code. Use when users want code review, reduce coupling, improve maintainability, or refactor scripts. Triggers: code review, coupling, maintainability, refactor, clean code, script quality, review my code, code smell, 代码审查, 代码质量, 重构, 低耦合, 可维护, 看看代码, 代码有问题.

  • 1,812 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 4 views
  • Added May 27, 2026
data-aigoc#railsperformancedocumentation

Works with

  • cli

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned May 27, 2026

npx -y skills add Besty0728/Unity-Skills --skill scriptdesign --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Scriptdesign?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Scriptdesign
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/besty0728-scriptdesign/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/besty0728-scriptdesign)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: unity-scriptdesign
description: "Script quality advisor for Unity gameplay code. Use when users want code review, reduce coupling, improve maintainability, or refactor scripts. Triggers: code review, coupling, maintainability, refactor, clean code, script quality, review my code, code smell, 代码审查, 代码质量, 重构, 低耦合, 可维护, 看看代码, 代码有问题."
---

# Unity Script Design Review

Use this skill before creating gameplay scripts, or after scripts are generated and need a design pass.

## Review Checklist

- Responsibility: does the script have one clear job?
- Role: should it really be a `MonoBehaviour`, `ScriptableObject`, or plain C# class?
- Coupling: are dependencies explicit instead of hidden globals or deep scene lookups?
- Communication: should this be a direct reference, interface call, or event?
- Performance: is there unnecessary `Update`, repeated `Find`, avoidable allocation, or reflection in hot paths?
- Lifecycle: are subscriptions, timers, and async work cleaned up clearly?
- Inspector UX: are serialized fields private, grouped, and explained?
- Testability: can the core logic move into a plain C# class?
- Naming: do class and field names explain intent without cryptic abbreviations?

## Data Lifecycle Boundary

The Review Checklist above asks "where does this *class* live". Ask the same question for every *field*. Every piece of state has one of three lifecycles, and putting a field on the wrong one is the most common cause of "why did this break when the designer tweaked a value" and "why are my unit tests flaky".

| Lifecycle | When the value is decided | Where it belongs | Typical idiom |
|-----------|--------------------------|------------------|---------------|
| **Authoring-time** | By a designer in the Editor, before Play | `ScriptableObject` asset, or `[SerializeField] private` on a prefab | Immutable at runtime; read via `_config.Speed` |
| **Composition-time** | Once per scene/instance, at `Awake`/`Start` | `private` field, assigned from `GetComponent` / `GetComponentInChildren` / ctor arg | Cached reference, no per-frame lookup |
| **Runtime-mutable** | Every frame or on gameplay events | `private` backing field + `public` read-only property + event | Exposed via `public float Health { get; private set; }` + `OnHealthChanged` |

### Typical assignments

- Weapon damage / fire rate / clip size → **Authoring-time** (ScriptableObject so balance can be hot-swapped).
- Enemy AI's current target `Transform` → **Composition-time** if set once at spawn, **Runtime-mutable** if re-targeted each frame.
- Player current HP → **Runtime-mutable** with event. Never `public float hp;`.
- Reference to `Rigidbody`/`Animator` on the same GameObject → **Composition-time**, cached in `Awake`.
- Level music track → **Authoring-time** via ScriptableObject level descriptor.
- "Is in combat" flag → **Runtime-mutable**, but usually derived from other state — review whether it should be a field at all.

### Why the separation matters

Mixing the three lifecycles is what turns a clean class into a god object. A `MonoBehaviour` whose `public float speed` is edited by both the Inspector **and** a power-up script has two owners and no invariant; a bug in either path corrupts the other. The ECS baking pipeline makes this distinction a hard architectural boundary (Authoring → Baker → System), and the discipline transfers directly: if you would not mix an Authoring component with runtime write-back in ECS, do not mix them in a MonoBehaviour either. *Source: `EntitiesSamples/Docs/baking.md:5-16`.*

## Guardrails

> **Mode**: Documentation only — no REST skills to gate; load freely under any operating mode (Approval / Auto / Bypass).

- Prefer descriptive names over local shorthand.
- Do not “optimize” readability away for imagined productivity gains.
- Do not recommend complex patterns if a smaller refactor fixes the real problem.

## Output Format

- Keep: what is already good
- Simplify: what should stay straightforward
- Refactor: the highest-value structural change
- Performance notes: only real hotspots, not theoretical micro-optimizations
- Maintainability notes: naming, ownership, coupling, editor usability

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.