Skip to content
Back to skills

Cook

ASecurity

ALWAYS activate this skill before implementing EVERY feature, plan, or fix.

  • 6 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added May 26, 2026
developmentrustgonodetestingcode-reviewgitfrontend

Works with

  • vscode
  • cli

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 6 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned May 27, 2026

npx -y skills add bestagentkits/ck-skills --skill cook --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Cook?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Cook
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/bestagentkits-cook/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/bestagentkits-cook)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: ck:cook
description: "ALWAYS activate this skill before implementing EVERY feature, plan, or fix."
argument-hint: "[task|plan-path] [--interactive|--fast|--parallel|--auto|--no-test]"
metadata:
  author: claudekit
  version: "2.1.1"
---

# Cook - Smart Feature Implementation

End-to-end implementation with automatic workflow detection.

**Principles:** YAGNI, KISS, DRY | Token efficiency | Concise reports

## Usage

```
/ck:cook <natural language task OR plan path>
```

**IMPORTANT:** If no flag is provided, the skill will use the `interactive` mode by default for the workflow.

**Optional flags to select the workflow mode:** 
- `--interactive`: Full workflow with user input (**default**)
- `--fast`: Skip research, scout→plan→code
- `--parallel`: Multi-agent execution
- `--no-test`: Skip testing step
- `--auto`: Auto-approve all steps

**Example:**
```
/ck:cook "Add user authentication to the app" --fast
/ck:cook path/to/plan.md --auto
```

<HARD-GATE>
Do NOT write implementation code until a plan exists and has been reviewed.
This applies regardless of task simplicity. "Simple" tasks are where unexamined assumptions waste the most time.
Exception: `--fast` mode skips research but still requires a plan step.
User override: If user explicitly says "just code it" or "skip planning", respect their instruction.
</HARD-GATE>

## Anti-Rationalization

| Thought | Reality |
|---------|---------|
| "This is too simple to plan" | Simple tasks have hidden complexity. Plan takes 30 seconds. |
| "I already know how to do this" | Knowing ≠ planning. Write it down. |
| "Let me just start coding" | Undisciplined action wastes tokens. Plan first. |
| "The user wants speed" | Fastest path = plan → implement → done. Not: implement → debug → rewrite. |
| "I'll plan as I go" | That's not planning, that's hoping. |
| "Just this once" | Every skip is "just this once." No exceptions. |

## Smart Intent Detection

| Input Pattern | Detected Mode | Behavior |
|---------------|---------------|----------|
| Path to `plan.md` or `phase-*.md` | code | Execute existing plan |
| Contains "fast", "quick" | fast | Skip research, scout→plan→code |
| Contains "trust me", "auto" | auto | Auto-approve all steps |
| Lists 3+ features OR "parallel" | parallel | Multi-agent execution |
| Contains "no test", "skip test" | no-test | Skip testing step |
| Default | interactive | Full workflow with user input |

See `references/intent-detection.md` for detection logic.

## Process Flow (Authoritative)

```mermaid
flowchart TD
    A[Intent Detection] --> B{Has plan path?}
    B -->|Yes| F[Load Plan]
    B -->|No| C{Mode?}
    C -->|fast| D[Scout → Plan → Code]
    C -->|interactive/auto| E[Research → Review → Plan]
    E --> F
    D --> F
    F --> G[Review Gate]
    G -->|approved| H[Implement]
    G -->|rejected| E
    H --> I[Review Gate]
    I -->|approved| J{--no-test?}
    J -->|No| K[Test]
    J -->|Yes| L[Finalize]
    K --> L
    L --> M[Report + Journal]
```

**This diagram is the authoritative workflow.** Prose sections below provide detail for each node. If prose conflicts with this flow, follow the diagram.

## Workflow Overview

```
[Intent Detection] → [Research?] → [Review] → [Plan] → [Review] → [Implement] → [Review] → [Test?] → [Review] → [Finalize]
```

**Default (non-auto):** Stops at `[Review]` gates for human approval before each major step.
**Auto mode (`--auto`):** Skips human review gates, implements all phases continuously.
**Claude Tasks:** Utilize `TaskCreate`, `TaskUpdate`, `TaskGet`, `TaskList` during implementation step. **Fallback:** These are CLI-only tools — unavailable in VSCode extension. If they error, use `TodoWrite` for progress tracking instead.

| Mode | Research | Testing | Review Gates | Phase Progression |
|------|----------|---------|--------------|-------------------|
| interactive | ✓ | ✓ | **User approval at each step** | One at a time |
| auto | ✓ | ✓ | Auto if score≥9.5 | All at once (no stops) |
| fast | ✗ | ✓ | **User approval at each step** | One at a time |
| parallel | Optional | ✓ | **User approval at each step** | Parallel groups |
| no-test | ✓ | ✗ | **User approval at each step** | One at a time |
| code | ✗ | ✓ | **User approval at each step** | Per plan |

## Step Output Format

```
✓ Step [N]: [Brief status] - [Key metrics]
```

## Blocking Gates (Non-Auto Mode)

Human review required at these checkpoints (skipped with `--auto`):
- **Post-Research:** Review findings before planning
- **Post-Plan:** Approve plan before implementation
- **Post-Implementation:** Approve code before testing
- **Post-Testing:** 100% pass + approve before finalize

**Always enforced (all modes):**
- **Testing:** 100% pass required (unless no-test mode)
- **Code Review:** User approval OR auto-approve (score≥9.5, 0 critical)
- **Finalize (MANDATORY - never skip):**
  1. `project-manager` subagent → run full plan sync-back (all completed tasks/steps across all `phase-XX-*.md`, not only current phase), then update `plan.md` status/progress
  2. `docs-manager` subagent → update `./docs` if changes warrant
  3. `TaskUpdate` → mark all Claude Tasks complete after sync-back verification (skip if Task tools unavailable)
  4. Ask user if they want to commit via `git-manager` subagent
  5. Run `/ck:journal` to write a concise technical journal entry upon completion

## Required Subagents (MANDATORY)

| Phase | Subagent | Requirement |
|-------|----------|-------------|
| Research | `researcher` | Optional in fast/code |
| Scout | `ck:scout` | Optional in code |
| Plan | `planner` | Optional in code |
| UI Work | `ui-ux-designer` | If frontend work |
| Testing | `tester`, `debugger` | **MUST** spawn |
| Review | `code-reviewer` | **MUST** spawn |
| Finalize | `project-manager`, `docs-manager`, `git-manager` | **MUST** spawn all 3 |

**CRITICAL ENFORCEMENT:**
- Steps 4, 5, 6 **MUST** use Task tool to spawn subagents
- DO NOT implement testing, review, or finalization yourself - DELEGATE
- If workflow ends with 0 Task tool calls, it is INCOMPLETE
- Pattern: `Task(subagent_type="[type]", prompt="[task]", description="[brief]")`

## References

- `references/intent-detection.md` - Detection rules and routing logic
- `references/workflow-steps.md` - Detailed step definitions for all modes
- `references/review-cycle.md` - Interactive and auto review processes
- `references/subagent-patterns.md` - Subagent invocation patterns

Files in this skill

  • README.md2.2 KB
  • SKILL.md6.4 KB
  • references/intent-detection.md3.2 KB
  • references/review-cycle.md2.8 KB
  • references/subagent-patterns.md2.5 KB
  • references/workflow-steps.md8.1 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.