Convert Roc code to idiomatic Haskell. Use when migrating Roc projects to Haskell, translating Roc patterns to idiomatic Haskell, or refactoring Roc codebases. Extends meta-convert-dev with Roc-to-Haskell specific patterns.
Scanned 2/10/2026
Install via CLI
openskills install aRustyDev/ai---
name: convert-roc-haskell
description: Convert Roc code to idiomatic Haskell. Use when migrating Roc projects to Haskell, translating Roc patterns to idiomatic Haskell, or refactoring Roc codebases. Extends meta-convert-dev with Roc-to-Haskell specific patterns.
---
# Convert Roc to Haskell
Convert Roc code to idiomatic Haskell. This skill extends `meta-convert-dev` with Roc-to-Haskell specific type mappings, idiom translations, and tooling for migrating platform-based Roc code to pure functional Haskell.
## This Skill Extends
- `meta-convert-dev` - Foundational conversion patterns (APTV workflow, testing strategies)
For general concepts like the Analyze → Plan → Transform → Validate workflow, testing strategies, and common pitfalls, see the meta-skill first.
## This Skill Adds
- **Type mappings**: Roc types → Haskell types
- **Idiom translations**: Roc patterns → idiomatic Haskell
- **Error handling**: Roc Result → Haskell Either/Maybe
- **Platform model**: Roc applications/platforms → Haskell IO/mtl
- **Abilities**: Roc abilities → Haskell type classes
- **Tag unions**: Roc structural tags → Haskell algebraic data types
## This Skill Does NOT Cover
- General conversion methodology - see `meta-convert-dev`
- Roc language fundamentals - see `lang-roc-dev`
- Haskell language fundamentals - see `lang-haskell-dev`
- Reverse conversion (Haskell → Roc) - see `convert-haskell-roc`
- Platform development - Both use different models; design from scratch
---
## Quick Reference
| Roc | Haskell | Notes |
|-----|---------|-------|
| `Str` | `String` or `Text` | Use Text for production |
| `U8`, `U16`, `U32`, `U64` | `Word8`, `Word16`, `Word32`, `Word64` | Unsigned integers |
| `I8`, `I16`, `I32`, `I64` | `Int8`, `Int16`, `Int32`, `Int64` | Signed integers |
| `F32`, `F64` | `Float`, `Double` | Floating point |
| `Bool` | `Bool` | Direct mapping |
| `List a` | `[a]` | Lists |
| `Dict k v` | `Map k v` | Use Data.Map |
| `Set a` | `Set a` | Use Data.Set |
| `Result a e` | `Either e a` | Note reversed type params |
| `[Tag1, Tag2]` | `data X = Tag1 \| Tag2` | Sum types |
| `{ field : Type }` | `data X = X { field :: Type }` | Records |
| `Task a err` | `IO a` or `ExceptT err IO a` | Effects |
| `where a implements Ability` | `(TypeClass a) =>` | Constraints |
## When Converting Code
1. **Analyze platform boundaries** - Understand where Roc platform ends and application begins
2. **Map types first** - Roc's structural types need explicit Haskell ADTs
3. **Preserve semantics** over syntax similarity
4. **Embrace laziness** - Haskell is lazy by default; Roc is strict
5. **Handle effects properly** - Roc Tasks become IO or monad transformers
6. **Test equivalence** - Same inputs → same outputs for pure logic
---
## Type System Mapping
### Primitive Types
| Roc | Haskell | Notes |
|-----|---------|-------|
| `Str` | `String` | List of Char (less efficient) |
| `Str` | `Text` | **Preferred** from Data.Text |
| `U8` | `Word8` | From Data.Word |
| `U16` | `Word16` | From Data.Word |
| `U32` | `Word32` | From Data.Word |
| `U64` | `Word64` | From Data.Word |
| `U128` | `Integer` | No direct u128, use arbitrary precision |
| `I8` | `Int8` | From Data.Int |
| `I16` | `Int16` | From Data.Int |
| `I32` | `Int32` | From Data.Int |
| `I64` | `Int64` | From Data.Int |
| `I128` | `Integer` | Arbitrary precision |
| `F32` | `Float` | 32-bit float |
| `F64` | `Double` | 64-bit float |
| `Bool` | `Bool` | Direct mapping |
| `Num a` | Polymorphic number | Use type classes |
### Collection Types
| Roc | Haskell | Notes |
|-----|---------|-------|
| `List a` | `[a]` | Linked list |
| `List a` | `Vector a` | For indexed access (Data.Vector) |
| `Dict k v` | `Map k v` | From Data.Map |
| `Set a` | `Set a` | From Data.Set |
### Composite Types
| Roc | Haskell | Notes |
|-----|---------|-------|
| `{ name : Str, age : U32 }` | `data User = User { name :: Text, age :: Word32 }` | Record syntax |
| `[Ok a, Err e]` | `Either e a` | Note: type params reversed! |
| `[Some a, None]` | `Maybe a` | Optional values |
| `[Tag1, Tag2, Tag3]` | `data X = Tag1 \| Tag2 \| Tag3` | Sum types |
| `[Tag(T)]` | `data X = Tag T` | Tag with payload |
### Function Types
| Roc | Haskell | Notes |
|-----|---------|-------|
| `a -> b` | `a -> b` | Simple function |
| `a, b -> c` | `a -> b -> c` | Curried by default |
| `a -> b where a implements Eq` | `(Eq a) => a -> b` | Type class constraint |
---
## Idiom Translation
### Pattern 1: Records and Record Updates
**Roc:**
```roc
user = { name: "Alice", age: 30, email: "alice@example.com" }
# Update syntax
olderUser = { user & age: 31 }
# Field access
userName = user.name
```
**Haskell:**
```haskell
data User = User
{ name :: Text
, age :: Word32
, email :: Text
} deriving (Show, Eq)
user = User "Alice" 30 "alice@example.com"
-- Update syntax
olderUser = user { age = 31 }
-- Field access (auto-generated accessor functions)
userName = name user
```
**Why this translation:**
- Roc's anonymous records need named data declarations in Haskell
- Both support record update syntax, but Haskell generates accessor functions
- Haskell requires explicit type declarations; Roc infers structural types
### Pattern 2: Tag Unions and Pattern Matching
**Roc:**
```roc
# Tag union
Color : [Red, Yellow, Green, Custom(U8, U8, U8)]
# Pattern matching
colorName = when color is
Red -> "red"
Yellow -> "yellow"
Green -> "green"
Custom(r, g, b) -> "rgb(\(Num.toStr(r)), \(Num.toStr(g)), \(Num.toStr(b)))"
```
**Haskell:**
```haskell
-- Algebraic data type
data Color
= Red
| Yellow
| Green
| Custom Word8 Word8 Word8
deriving (Show, Eq)
-- Pattern matching with case
colorName :: Color -> String
colorName color = case color of
Red -> "red"
Yellow -> "yellow"
Green -> "green"
Custom r g b -> "rgb(" ++ show r ++ ", " ++ show g ++ ", " ++ show b ++ ")"
-- Or with function patterns
colorName' :: Color -> String
colorName' Red = "red"
colorName' Yellow = "yellow"
colorName' Green = "green"
colorName' (Custom r g b) = "rgb(" ++ show r ++ ", " ++ show g ++ ", " ++ show b ++ ")"
```
**Why this translation:**
- Roc's structural tag unions become nominal ADTs in Haskell
- Both enforce exhaustive pattern matching
- Haskell allows pattern matching in function definitions, not just case expressions
### Pattern 3: Result Type and Error Handling
**Roc:**
```roc
divide : I64, I64 -> Result I64 [DivByZero]
divide = \a, b ->
if b == 0 then
Err(DivByZero)
else
Ok(a // b)
# Using try (!) for propagation
calculate : I64, I64, I64 -> Result I64 [DivByZero]
calculate = \a, b, c ->
x = divide!(a, b)
y = divide!(x, c)
Ok(y)
```
**Haskell:**
```haskell
-- Either for errors (note reversed params from Roc)
data DivError = DivByZero deriving (Show, Eq)
divide :: Int64 -> Int64 -> Either DivError Int64
divide a 0 = Left DivByZero
divide a b = Right (a `div` b)
-- Using do-notation for propagation
calculate :: Int64 -> Int64 -> Int64 -> Either DivError Int64
calculate a b c = do
x <- divide a b
y <- divide x c
return y
-- Or with applicative style
calculate' :: Int64 -> Int64 -> Int64 -> Either DivError Int64
calculate' a b c =
divide a b >>= \x ->
divide x c
```
**Why this translation:**
- Roc's `Result a e` maps to Haskell's `Either e a` (type params reversed!)
- Roc's `!` suffix maps to Haskell's `<-` in do-notation
- Both provide monadic error propagation
- Haskell's Either is more general (any error type), Roc uses tag unions
### Pattern 4: Abilities to Type Classes
**Roc:**
```roc
# Using ability constraint
toString : a -> Str where a implements Inspect
toString = \value ->
Inspect.toStr(value)
# Custom type automatically implements abilities
User : {
name : Str,
age : U32,
}
user = { name: "Alice", age: 30 }
expect Inspect.toStr(user) == "{ name: \"Alice\", age: 30 }"
```
**Haskell:**
```haskell
-- Type class constraint
toString :: (Show a) => a -> String
toString value = show value
-- Custom type with deriving
data User = User
{ name :: Text
, age :: Word32
} deriving (Show, Eq)
user = User "Alice" 30
-- show user == "User {name = \"Alice\", age = 30}"
```
**Why this translation:**
- Roc abilities are similar to Haskell type classes
- Roc auto-derives abilities; Haskell requires explicit `deriving` clauses
- Haskell has more established type classes (Functor, Monad, etc.)
### Pattern 5: List Pipeline Operations
**Roc:**
```roc
numbers = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
result = numbers
|> List.map(\n -> n * 2)
|> List.keepIf(\n -> n > 5)
|> List.walk(0, \acc, n -> acc + n)
```
**Haskell:**
```haskell
import Data.Function ((&))
numbers = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
-- Using function composition (right to left)
result = foldr (+) 0 . filter (>5) . map (*2) $ numbers
-- Or using & operator (left to right, like Roc)
result' = numbers
& map (*2)
& filter (>5)
& foldr (+) 0
```
**Why this translation:**
- Roc's `|>` maps to Haskell's `&` operator
- Function composition `.` is more idiomatic but reads backward
- Haskell's `foldr`/`foldl` map to Roc's `List.walk`
---
## Error Handling
### Result → Either Translation
**Type Mapping:**
```
Roc: Result a e
[Ok a, Err e]
Haskell: Either e a
Left e | Right a
```
**Key Difference:** Type parameters are reversed!
**Roc:**
```roc
parseAge : Str -> Result U32 [ParseError Str]
parseAge = \str ->
when Str.toU32(str) is
Ok(n) -> Ok(n)
Err(_) -> Err(ParseError("Not a valid number"))
# Chain operations
validateUser : Str, Str -> Result User [ParseError Str, InvalidEmail]
validateUser = \ageStr, emailStr ->
age = parseAge!(ageStr)
email = validateEmail!(emailStr)
Ok({ name: "User", age, email })
```
**Haskell:**
```haskell
import Text.Read (readMaybe)
import Data.Text (Text)
data ValidationError
= ParseError String
| InvalidEmail
deriving (Show, Eq)
parseAge :: Text -> Either ValidationError Word32
parseAge str =
case readMaybe (unpack str) of
Just n -> Right n
Nothing -> Left (ParseError "Not a valid number")
-- Chain with do-notation
validateUser :: Text -> Text -> Either ValidationError User
validateUser ageStr emailStr = do
age <- parseAge ageStr
email <- validateEmail emailStr
return $ User "User" age email
```
### Multiple Error Types
**Roc:**
```roc
# Tag union for multiple errors
Error : [ParseError Str, DivByZero, NetworkError Str]
process : Str, Str -> Result I64 Error
process = \aStr, bStr ->
a = Str.toI64!(aStr) |> Result.mapErr(\_ -> ParseError("Invalid a"))
b = Str.toI64!(bStr) |> Result.mapErr(\_ -> ParseError("Invalid b"))
divide!(a, b) |> Result.mapErr(\_ -> DivByZero)
```
**Haskell:**
```haskell
data Error
= ParseError String
| DivByZero
| NetworkError String
deriving (Show, Eq)
process :: Text -> Text -> Either Error Int64
process aStr bStr = do
a <- parseI64 aStr `mapLeft` const (ParseError "Invalid a")
b <- parseI64 bStr `mapLeft` const (ParseError "Invalid b")
divide a b `mapLeft` const DivByZero
where
mapLeft f (Left e) = Left (f e)
mapLeft _ (Right x) = Right x
```
---
## Platform Model Translation
### Roc Platform/Application → Haskell IO
**Roc Application:**
```roc
app [main] {
pf: platform "https://github.com/roc-lang/basic-cli/releases/..."
}
import pf.Stdout
import pf.Task exposing [Task]
import pf.File
main : Task {} []
main =
content = File.readUtf8!("input.txt")
processed = Str.toUpper(content)
File.writeUtf8!("output.txt", processed)
Stdout.line!("Done!")
```
**Haskell:**
```haskell
import qualified Data.Text.IO as TIO
import qualified Data.Text as T
import System.IO
main :: IO ()
main = do
content <- TIO.readFile "input.txt"
let processed = T.toUpper content
TIO.writeFile "output.txt" processed
putStrLn "Done!"
```
**Key Differences:**
- Roc separates platform (I/O) from application (pure code)
- Haskell uses IO monad throughout
- Roc's `!` suffix maps to Haskell's `<-` in do-notation
- Both use monadic composition for effects
### Task Error Handling
**Roc:**
```roc
readConfig : Str -> Task Config [FileNotFound, ParseError Str]
readConfig = \path ->
content = File.readUtf8!(path) # May fail with FileNotFound
when parseJson(content) is
Ok(config) -> Task.ok(config)
Err(e) -> Task.err(ParseError(e))
```
**Haskell:**
```haskell
import Control.Monad.Except
import qualified Data.Text.IO as TIO
data ConfigError
= FileNotFound
| ParseError String
deriving (Show, Eq)
readConfig :: FilePath -> ExceptT ConfigError IO Config
readConfig path = do
contentE <- liftIO $ try $ TIO.readFile path
content <- case contentE of
Left (_ :: IOException) -> throwError FileNotFound
Right c -> return c
case parseJson content of
Left e -> throwError (ParseError e)
Right config -> return config
```
**Why this translation:**
- Roc Tasks with error types map to `ExceptT err IO a`
- Both provide error propagation and recovery
- Haskell separates IO errors (exceptions) from domain errors (Either/ExceptT)
---
## Concurrency Patterns
### Roc Task Concurrency → Haskell Async
**Roc:**
```roc
# Platform-provided concurrency
import pf.Task exposing [Task]
import pf.Http
fetchBoth : Task (Str, Str) [HttpErr]
fetchBoth =
# Platform may execute concurrently
Task.parallel2(
Http.get("http://api.example.com/1"),
Http.get("http://api.example.com/2")
)
```
**Haskell:**
```haskell
import Control.Concurrent.Async
import Network.HTTP.Simple
fetchBoth :: IO (ByteString, ByteString)
fetchBoth = concurrently
(getResponseBody <$> httpBS "http://api.example.com/1")
(getResponseBody <$> httpBS "http://api.example.com/2")
-- Or with race (first wins)
fetchFirst :: IO ByteString
fetchFirst = race
(getResponseBody <$> httpBS "http://api.example.com/1")
(getResponseBody <$> httpBS "http://api.example.com/2")
>>= either return return
```
**Why this translation:**
- Roc delegates all concurrency to the platform
- Haskell provides explicit concurrency primitives (async library)
- Both provide structured concurrency with proper cleanup
### No Direct Threading
**Roc:**
```roc
# Roc applications don't directly manage threads
# All concurrency is platform capability
# Task composition is the only abstraction
```
**Haskell:**
```haskell
import Control.Concurrent
-- Haskell provides lightweight threads
main = do
forkIO $ do
threadDelay 1000000
putStrLn "Hello from thread"
putStrLn "Main thread continues"
threadDelay 2000000
-- Use async for structured concurrency (recommended)
import Control.Concurrent.Async
main' = do
a <- async $ do
threadDelay 1000000
return "result"
result <- wait a
print result
```
---
## Laziness Translation
### Roc (Strict) → Haskell (Lazy)
**Roc:**
```roc
# Roc is strict by default
numbers = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
# This evaluates immediately
doubled = List.map(numbers, \n -> n * 2)
# Infinite lists require Stream or explicit laziness
naturals = Stream.iterate(0, \n -> n + 1)
```
**Haskell:**
```haskell
-- Haskell is lazy by default
numbers = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
-- This creates a thunk, evaluated on demand
doubled = map (*2) numbers
-- Infinite lists work naturally
naturals = iterate (+1) 0
take 10 naturals -- [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]
-- Force strict evaluation when needed
import Control.DeepSeq
strictDoubled = force $ map (*2) numbers
```
**Key Differences:**
- Roc evaluates eagerly; add explicit limits before processing
- Haskell evaluates lazily; infinite structures work out of the box
- When converting, be careful with space leaks in Haskell (use `seq`, `$!`, or strict data structures)
---
## Common Pitfalls
### 1. Result Type Parameter Order
```
❌ Assuming Roc Result and Haskell Either have same param order
✓ Remember: Result a e → Either e a (reversed!)
```
**Roc:**
```roc
divide : I64, I64 -> Result I64 [DivByZero]
# Result ^ok ^err
```
**Haskell:**
```haskell
divide :: Int64 -> Int64 -> Either DivError Int64
-- Either ^err ^ok
```
### 2. Structural vs Nominal Types
```
❌ Using Haskell tuples for Roc records
✓ Define proper ADTs with record syntax
```
**Roc:**
```roc
user = { name: "Alice", age: 30 } # Structural type
```
**Haskell:**
```haskell
-- Wrong: (Text, Word32) -- Positional, no field names
-- Right:
data User = User { name :: Text, age :: Word32 }
```
### 3. Platform Boundary Confusion
```
❌ Trying to replicate Roc's platform model in Haskell
✓ Use IO monad or mtl transformers for effects
```
### 4. Strict vs Lazy Semantics
```
❌ Assuming Roc's eager evaluation in Haskell
✓ Add explicit limits (take, drop) before consuming infinite lists
✓ Use strict variants when performance matters (foldl', force)
```
### 5. Ability Auto-Derivation
```
❌ Expecting Haskell to auto-derive like Roc
✓ Add explicit deriving clauses (Show, Eq, etc.)
```
---
## Tooling
| Tool | Purpose | Notes |
|------|---------|-------|
| GHC | Haskell compiler | Primary compiler |
| GHCi | REPL | Interactive development |
| Stack | Build tool | Dependency management, reproducible builds |
| Cabal | Build tool | Alternative to Stack |
| HLint | Linter | Code suggestions |
| Ormolu / Brittany | Formatter | Code formatting |
| hspec / QuickCheck | Testing | Unit and property-based tests |
No direct Roc→Haskell transpiler exists; conversion is manual.
---
## Examples
### Example 1: Simple - Tag Union Pattern Matching
**Before (Roc):**
```roc
Status : [Pending, Approved, Rejected]
handleStatus : Status -> Str
handleStatus = \status ->
when status is
Pending -> "Waiting..."
Approved -> "Done!"
Rejected -> "Failed"
```
**After (Haskell):**
```haskell
data Status = Pending | Approved | Rejected
deriving (Show, Eq)
handleStatus :: Status -> String
handleStatus Pending = "Waiting..."
handleStatus Approved = "Done!"
handleStatus Rejected = "Failed"
```
### Example 2: Medium - Result with Error Propagation
**Before (Roc):**
```roc
divide : I64, I64 -> Result I64 [DivByZero]
divide = \a, b ->
if b == 0 then
Err(DivByZero)
else
Ok(a // b)
calculate : I64, I64, I64 -> Result I64 [DivByZero]
calculate = \a, b, c ->
x = divide!(a, b)
y = divide!(x, c)
Ok(y)
# Usage
when calculate(20, 4, 2) is
Ok(result) -> Num.toStr(result)
Err(DivByZero) -> "Error: division by zero"
```
**After (Haskell):**
```haskell
data DivError = DivByZero
deriving (Show, Eq)
divide :: Int64 -> Int64 -> Either DivError Int64
divide _ 0 = Left DivByZero
divide a b = Right (a `div` b)
calculate :: Int64 -> Int64 -> Int64 -> Either DivError Int64
calculate a b c = do
x <- divide a b
y <- divide x c
return y
-- Usage
result = case calculate 20 4 2 of
Right r -> show r
Left DivByZero -> "Error: division by zero"
```
### Example 3: Complex - Platform Application to IO
**Before (Roc):**
```roc
app [main] {
pf: platform "https://github.com/roc-lang/basic-cli/releases/..."
}
import pf.Stdout
import pf.File
import pf.Task exposing [Task]
Config : { port : U16, host : Str }
parseConfig : Str -> Result Config [ParseError Str]
parseConfig = \content ->
# Parse JSON content
when Json.decode(content) is
Ok(config) -> Ok(config)
Err(e) -> Err(ParseError(e))
main : Task {} []
main =
# Read config file
content = File.readUtf8!("config.json")
# Parse config
config = when parseConfig(content) is
Ok(c) -> Task.ok!(c)
Err(ParseError(msg)) ->
Stdout.line!("Config error: \(msg)")
Task.err!(ConfigError)
# Use config
Stdout.line!("Starting server on \(config.host):\(Num.toStr(config.port))")
```
**After (Haskell):**
```haskell
{-# LANGUAGE DeriveGeneric #-}
import qualified Data.Text.IO as TIO
import qualified Data.Text as T
import Data.Aeson (FromJSON, eitherDecode)
import GHC.Generics
import Control.Monad.Except
import qualified Data.ByteString.Lazy as BL
data Config = Config
{ port :: Word16
, host :: Text
} deriving (Generic, Show)
instance FromJSON Config
data AppError
= ParseError String
| ConfigError
deriving (Show, Eq)
parseConfig :: BL.ByteString -> Either AppError Config
parseConfig content =
case eitherDecode content of
Right config -> Right config
Left err -> Left (ParseError err)
main :: IO ()
main = do
result <- runExceptT $ do
-- Read config file
content <- liftIO $ BL.readFile "config.json"
-- Parse config
config <- case parseConfig content of
Right c -> return c
Left (ParseError msg) -> do
liftIO $ putStrLn $ "Config error: " ++ msg
throwError ConfigError
-- Use config
liftIO $ putStrLn $
"Starting server on " ++ T.unpack (host config)
++ ":" ++ show (port config)
case result of
Left err -> putStrLn $ "Error: " ++ show err
Right _ -> return ()
```
---
## See Also
For more examples and patterns, see:
- `meta-convert-dev` - Foundational patterns with cross-language examples
- `convert-elm-haskell` - Similar pure functional language conversion
- `lang-roc-dev` - Roc development patterns
- `lang-haskell-dev` - Haskell development patterns
Cross-cutting pattern skills:
- `patterns-concurrency-dev` - Compare Roc Task model with Haskell async/STM
- `patterns-serialization-dev` - JSON handling across languages
- `patterns-metaprogramming-dev` - Template Haskell vs no metaprogramming in Roc
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!