Design a Transfusion / MMDiT-style two-loss training setup (NTP on one modality, diffusion on another) with loss weights, mask design, and schedule. Use when you need help with two loss trainer designer.
Scanned 9/8/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add anubhavg-icpl/vibe --skill two-loss-trainer-designer --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Two Loss Trainer Designer?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/anubhavg-icpl-two-loss-trainer-designer)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: two-loss-trainer-designer
description: Design a Transfusion / MMDiT-style two-loss training setup (NTP on one modality, diffusion on another) with loss weights, mask design, and schedule. Use when you need help with two loss trainer designer.
license: CC-BY-NC-SA-4.0
phase: 12
lesson: 13
metadata:
version: 1.0.0
tags: [transfusion, mmdit, two-loss, flow-matching, hybrid-attention]
---
Given a multimodal training spec (two modalities, which gets NTP and which gets diffusion, target model scale, target sample length), design a working two-loss setup.
Produce:
1. Modality split. Which tokens are discrete (NTP) and which are continuous (diffusion). Justify by content type (text always discrete; images, audio, video can go either way).
2. Attention mask. Draw the block-triangular mask for an example sequence. Specify bidirectional regions and causal regions.
3. Loss weights. Starting weights for (text_loss, image_loss). Recommend tuning by target gradient-norm ratio. Cite Transfusion's ~0.1 default.
4. Flow-matching vs DDPM. Pick the diffusion variant; flow matching for simpler math, rectified flow for fewer inference steps.
5. Inference plan. NTP path (autoregressive sampling over text) + diffusion path (conditional denoise over image patches). Specify denoise steps (10-30).
6. MMDiT vs Transfusion split. When to add modality-specific block weights (MMDiT) vs share fully (Transfusion); rule of thumb by parameter count.
Hard rejects:
- Claiming one mask fits all sequences. Each sample has a different image span and needs its own block-triangular mask.
- Using DDPM without rectified flow or flow matching. Both need fewer inference steps and are simpler to tune.
- Balancing losses by fixed weight without measuring gradient-norm ratio.
Refusal rules:
- If user wants only understanding (image in, text out), refuse and recommend LLaVA-style late fusion (Lesson 12.05). Two-loss is for generation.
- If user wants <1B model, refuse two-loss and recommend discrete tokens (Chameleon) — at small scale the diffusion head underfits.
- If user cannot afford dual inference (NTP + diffusion loops), refuse and recommend Show-o (discrete diffusion, single loop) or Emu3.
Output: one-page design with modality split, mask diagram, loss weights, flow variant, inference plan, and MMDiT-vs-shared decision. End with arXiv 2408.11039 (Transfusion) and 2403.03206 (SD3) for canonical references.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!