Skip to content
Back to skills

Skill Segmentation Mask Inspector

ASecurity

Report class distribution, predicted-mask statistics, and the classes most likely to be under-predicted or boundary-blurred. Use when you need help with skill segmentation mask inspector.

  • 9 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added September 8, 2026
developmentdebugginggit

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 8, 2026

npx -y skills add anubhavg-icpl/vibe --skill skill-segmentation-mask-inspector --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Skill Segmentation Mask Inspector?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Skill Segmentation Mask Inspector
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/anubhavg-icpl-skill-segmentation-mask-inspector/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/anubhavg-icpl-skill-segmentation-mask-inspector)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: skill-segmentation-mask-inspector
description: Report class distribution, predicted-mask statistics, and the classes most likely to be under-predicted or boundary-blurred. Use when you need help with skill segmentation mask inspector.
license: CC-BY-NC-SA-4.0
phase: 4
lesson: 7
metadata:
  version: 1.0.0
  tags: [computer-vision, segmentation, debugging, evaluation]
---

# Segmentation Mask Inspector

A diagnostic for the gap between "the loss went down" and "the masks actually look right".

## When to use

- Right after a training run when mIoU looks fine but visual inspection says otherwise.
- Before deployment: checking the class balance of predictions against ground truth.
- When per-class IoU is high for large objects but low for small ones.
- Debugging boundary artefacts that do not show up in IoU because they are small in pixel count.

## Inputs

- `preds`: (N, H, W) tensor of predicted class IDs.
- `targets`: (N, H, W) tensor of ground-truth class IDs.
- `num_classes`: integer.
- Optional `class_names`: list of C strings.

## Steps

1. **Class pixel histograms.** Compute the percentage of pixels per class for `preds` and `targets`. Flag any class where `|pred% - gt%| / max(gt%, 1e-6) > 0.30` (relative deviation above 30%). For classes absent from ground truth (`gt% == 0`), flag any predicted share above `0.3` directly.

2. **IoU per class** and **boundary F1 per class**. Boundary F1 is computed by dilating each mask by 3 pixels, intersecting, and scoring. Classes with IoU > 0.7 but boundary F1 < 0.5 are blurring edges.

3. **Small-object recall.** Separate every ground-truth connected component into size buckets (tiny < 100 px, small < 1000 px, medium < 10000 px, large >= 10000 px). Report recall per bucket per class. Small-object recall below 0.3 while large-object recall is above 0.9 indicates a resolution / receptive-field problem.

4. **Confusion pairs.** For each class, find the class it most often confuses with (most common wrong predicted class within its ground-truth mask). Report the top 3 pairs.

5. **Saturation check (requires `probs` or `logits`, not just `preds`).** If the caller passes the raw per-pixel probability distribution `probs: (N, C, H, W)`, compute the fraction of pixels where `probs.max(dim=1) > 0.99` per class. High saturation (>0.9 of a class's pixels) suggests overconfidence — candidate for label smoothing or calibration. When only argmaxed `preds` are available, skip this step and note it in the report.

## Report format

```
[mask-inspector]
  classes: C

[class distribution]
  name       gt %    pred %   delta
  ...

[metrics]
  class       IoU     bF1    recall_tiny  recall_small  recall_medium  recall_large
  ...

[confusion pairs]
  class A confused with class B: <N> pixels (most common)
  class B confused with class A: <N> pixels
  ...

[verdict]
  most impactful issue: <one sentence>
```

## Rules

- Sort class rows by descending gt pixel share so the most frequent classes come first.
- Flag classes with IoU < 0.4 or boundary F1 < 0.3 as `critical`.
- When small-object recall is the dominant failure, recommend: higher-resolution training, smaller stride at the last encoder stage, or a feature-pyramid decoder.
- When boundary F1 is the dominant failure, recommend: boundary-aware loss (Lovasz or BoundaryLoss), TTA with horizontal flip, and stride-less decoder.
- Never output class indices as the only identifier; if `class_names` is provided, use it in every row.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.