Skip to content
Back to skills

Moe Configurator

ASecurity

Pick expert count, top-k, balancing strategy, and shared-expert layout for a new MoE transformer. Use when you need help with moe configurator.

  • 9 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added September 8, 2026
development

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 8, 2026

npx -y skills add anubhavg-icpl/vibe --skill moe-configurator --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Moe Configurator?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Moe Configurator
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/anubhavg-icpl-moe-configurator/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/anubhavg-icpl-moe-configurator)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: moe-configurator
description: Pick expert count, top-k, balancing strategy, and shared-expert layout for a new MoE transformer. Use when you need help with moe configurator.
license: CC-BY-NC-SA-4.0
phase: 7
lesson: 11
metadata:
  version: 1.0.0
  tags: [transformers, moe, mixture-of-experts, scaling]
---

Given a transformer spec (total parameter budget, desired active params per token, training tokens available, inference hardware), output:

1. MoE layout. `n_experts`, `top_k`, `n_shared`. Pick fine-grained (256+ experts, top-8) for frontier scales; classic (8 experts, top-2) for smaller. One-sentence reason.
2. Balancing strategy. Auxiliary-loss-free (DeepSeek-V3, default), Switch-style auxiliary loss, or expert-capacity + token drop. Name the `γ` value if aux-loss-free.
3. Expert parallelism plan. How to shard experts across GPUs given VRAM. State per-expert VRAM cost and total fleet size.
4. Routing precision. fp32 router scores vs fp16. Router precision matters at scale.
5. Failure mode check. Named risk: router collapse, expert starvation, all-to-all network bottleneck, inference latency from routing overhead, checkpoint memory footprint.

Refuse to recommend MoE for active-parameter counts below 4B — dense wins at matched compute. Refuse auxiliary-loss-only balancing for new projects in 2026 (aux-loss-free is the default). Refuse to ship an MoE without an expert-parallel plan if total params exceed 80 GB. Flag MoE for latency-critical single-user paths as likely slower than dense equivalents.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.