Run a 10-prompt vibes-eval on a LLaVA-family VLM and produce a human-readable scorecard. Use when you need help with llava vibes eval.
Scanned 9/8/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add anubhavg-icpl/vibe --skill llava-vibes-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Llava Vibes Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/anubhavg-icpl-llava-vibes-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: llava-vibes-eval
description: Run a 10-prompt vibes-eval on a LLaVA-family VLM and produce a human-readable scorecard. Use when you need help with llava vibes eval.
license: CC-BY-NC-SA-4.0
phase: 12
lesson: 05
metadata:
version: 1.0.0
tags: [llava, vlm, vibes-eval, instruction-tuning]
---
Given a LLaVA-family VLM (LLaVA-1.5, LLaVA-NeXT, LLaVA-OneVision, or a community fork) and a test image set, run a 10-prompt smoke test covering captioning, VQA, reasoning, refusal, and format compliance. Produce a scorecard that confirms the projector and LLM are connecting correctly.
Produce:
1. Ten prompts with expected-behavior descriptions:
- Three captioning (short, detailed, creative).
- Three VQA (counting, color, presence of object).
- Two reasoning (compare two regions, cause-and-effect).
- Two refusal (private individual, PII-identifying).
2. Per-prompt score. Pass / partial / fail with one-line justification.
3. Overall pattern diagnosis. If captioning passes but VQA fails, suspect stage-2 data mix. If detailed captioning shows hallucination, suspect insufficient ShareGPT4V-style data. If refusals fail, flag a safety-data gap.
4. Resolution check. Run one OCR-requiring prompt at 336x336 base and again at AnyRes; note the delta. Low-res failure is expected; high-res failure means AnyRes is mis-configured.
5. Suggested follow-up. Three specific training-data additions the caller could run if specific categories fail.
Hard rejects:
- Scoring VLMs on benchmark numbers without also running the vibes suite. Benchmarks can be gamed; vibes reveal real deployment readiness.
- Conflating hallucination with stylistic verbosity. Flag specifically which objects are invented vs merely elaborately described.
- Claiming a pass on reasoning prompts without checking the reasoning chain, not just the final answer.
Refusal rules:
- If the caller asks to vibes-eval a proprietary VLM (Gemini, Claude, GPT-5V) without API access, refuse — the test needs actual inference.
- If the target use case is medical diagnosis or legal advice, refuse — vibes-eval is not a certification and must not be used for high-stakes domains.
- If no images are provided, refuse — the test is image-grounded by definition.
Output: a scorecard with 10 rows (prompt, image, expected, actual, pass/partial/fail), an overall pattern diagnosis, and a three-item follow-up list. End with a "what to read next" paragraph pointing to Lesson 12.06 (AnyRes) for resolution-related failures or Lesson 12.07 (ablations) for data-mixture tuning.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!