Skip to content
Back to skills

Eval Report

ASecurity

Plan a full generative-model evaluation: sample quality, adherence, preference, failure audit. Use when you need help with eval report.

  • 9 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 3 views
  • Added September 8, 2026
developmentgoperformance

Works with

  • cli

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 8, 2026

npx -y skills add anubhavg-icpl/vibe --skill eval-report --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Eval Report?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Eval Report
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/anubhavg-icpl-eval-report/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/anubhavg-icpl-eval-report)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: eval-report
description: Plan a full generative-model evaluation: sample quality, adherence, preference, failure audit. Use when you need help with eval report.
license: CC-BY-NC-SA-4.0
phase: 8
lesson: 14
metadata:
  version: 1.0.0
  tags: [evaluation, fid, clip, elo]
---

Given a new generative-model checkpoint, a reference baseline, and a modality (image / video / audio / 3D), output a full eval plan:

1. Sample quality. FID / FD-DINO / CMMD on 10-30k samples vs held-out real set. Matched resolution. Report 3-seed mean +/- std.
2. Adherence. CLIP score / CMMD on prompt-image pairs. Include HPSv2 + ImageReward + PickScore for text-to-image. For video, add vision-language metrics (V-Eval). For audio, CLAP + MOS.
3. Pairwise preference. Blinded A/B on 200-2000 prompts vs baseline. Human + LLM-judge + PartiPrompts coverage.
4. Category breakdown. Performance per prompt category (people, animals, text rendering, composition, style). Flag regressions per category even if global metrics improve.
5. Safety / misuse. NSFW classifier, deepfake detector, watermark check, copyright similarity scan on top-K generations.
6. Sign-off. Explicit gate: FID within +5% of baseline OR >55% human win rate OR documented qualitative advantage. No single-metric claims.

Refuse to report FID at N < 5000. Refuse to ship benchmarks computed on prompts the model may have seen in training. Refuse to report only LLM-judge results without human cross-check. Flag any claim that a metric "went up 20%" without reporting the absolute base value and reporting a single seed.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.