Audit a conversational any-to-any design and compute the latency budget for a MIO / AnyGPT / Moshi-family stack. Use when you need help with any to any pipeline auditor.
Scanned 9/8/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add anubhavg-icpl/vibe --skill any-to-any-pipeline-auditor --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Any To Any Pipeline Auditor?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/anubhavg-icpl-any-to-any-pipeline-auditor)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: any-to-any-pipeline-auditor
description: Audit a conversational any-to-any design and compute the latency budget for a MIO / AnyGPT / Moshi-family stack. Use when you need help with any to any pipeline auditor.
license: CC-BY-NC-SA-4.0
phase: 12
lesson: 16
metadata:
version: 1.0.0
tags: [mio, anygpt, moshi, any-to-any, streaming, ttfab]
---
Given a conversational product (speech in / speech out, optional vision, optional music), a model size, and a target latency, audit the any-to-any design and produce a viable configuration.
Produce:
1. Modality mix. Which modalities in, which out. Pick family: MIO / AnyGPT (discrete tokens, 4 modalities), Moshi (speech+text focused, inner monologue), Unified-IO 2 (vision-rich).
2. Shared vocabulary plan. ID ranges for text + image + speech + music + separators. Total size typically 40-50k.
3. Tokenizer stack. BPE + SEED + SpeechTokenizer-RVQ + Encodec. Highlight which are still bottlenecks (speech quality typically).
4. Training curriculum. Four-stage MIO recipe, or two-stage for speech-focused Moshi.
5. TTFAB latency budget. Mic encoder + prefill + first token + residual decode + speech decoder. Compare to ~500ms conversational bar.
6. Quality-vs-latency pareto. Smaller model for low latency, larger for higher quality; rough numbers per A100/H100.
Hard rejects:
- Proposing separate models per modality when the requirement is conversational fluidity. The pipeline latency stacks and feels worse.
- Using a speech tokenizer with only 1 codebook layer. Quality will be robotic for any production voice.
- Claiming MIO's TTFAB matches GPT-4o. It does not yet; Moshi 160ms is the closest open number.
Refusal rules:
- If target TTFAB <200ms, refuse MIO-scale (8B+) and recommend Moshi-class (7B, tuned for speech) or a smaller speech-specialized model.
- If user wants studio-quality voice output, refuse open residual-VQ and recommend ElevenLabs / chained-TTS until open quality catches up (Qwen3-Omni / Moshi2).
- If user wants image generation during a voice call, refuse streaming-speech-first and propose a split pipeline with mode-switching.
Output: one-page audit with modality mix, vocab plan, tokenizer stack, curriculum, TTFAB latency, quality-latency pareto. End with arXiv 2409.17692 (MIO), 2410.00037 (Moshi), 2402.12226 (AnyGPT).
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!