Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsBlogPro
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges
  • Chrome Extension
  • Skill Manager

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Testing Strategy

ASecurity

Use when defining a project's test approach, when choosing what gets tested at unit vs integration vs e2e level, when setting per-component coverage targets, when reviewing test quality, or when CI is slow / flaky and tests need a strategy reset.

3 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 5/28/2026
developmentgotestingrefactoringcode-reviewdatabasefrontend

Works with

cli

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 5/28/2026

$npx -y skills add aneja5/forge-skills --skill testing-strategy --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Testing Strategy?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Testing Strategy
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/aneja5-testing-strategy/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/aneja5-testing-strategy)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: testing-strategy
description: Use when defining a project's test approach, when choosing what gets tested at unit vs integration vs e2e level, when setting per-component coverage targets, when reviewing test quality, or when CI is slow / flaky and tests need a strategy reset.
---

# Testing Strategy

## Overview

Define what gets tested, at what level, with what mocking — *before* tests proliferate. Output is `.forge/testing-strategy.md` — the test pyramid for this project (unit/integration/e2e ratio), what each level is responsible for, mocking philosophy, per-component coverage targets, the critical-path inventory, the flake quarantine policy, and CI gate definitions. Consumed by `incremental-implementation`, `tdd`, and `code-review-and-quality`.

## When to Use

- A new project is starting and needs test conventions before code lands
- The test suite has grown organically and is slow, flaky, or inconsistent
- Coverage % is being treated as a goal and producing meaningless tests
- A team is mocking everything internally and tests pass while features break
- CI takes >15 minutes and the team is starting to skip tests

## When NOT to Use

- Single-task work where `tdd` is the right skill (write the test, write the code)
- Reference implementations or learning projects where tests aren't shipped
- The strategy exists, is followed, and only one component needs adjustment

## Common Rationalizations

| Thought | Reality |
|---------|---------|
| "100% coverage is the goal" | Coverage measures lines hit, not behavior verified. 100% coverage of a deleted file is meaningless. |
| "Mock everything" | Mocking internals tests the mock, not the code. When the implementation changes, mocks lie. |
| "E2E is too slow, skip it" | One e2e test catches what 50 unit tests miss — integration between layers is where most bugs live. |
| "We'll add tests after" | Tests-after test imagined behavior, not actual behavior. They lock in accidents as decisions. |
| "Flaky tests just need a retry" | Retries hide bugs. A flaky test is a heisenbug — quarantine and fix the root cause. |
| "Test the implementation so refactors stay safe" | Refactors should change implementation freely. Tests on internals make refactoring expensive. |

## Red Flags

- "100% coverage" as the explicit target
- A test file with `expect(spy).toHaveBeenCalledWith(...)` and no other assertions
- Every external service mocked at function level (mock the boundary instead)
- Zero end-to-end tests for the primary user journey
- A test that takes >30 seconds and runs on every commit
- A test that passes when the underlying feature is manually broken (snapshot rot, weak assertions)
- A retry config on `pytest`/`vitest`/`jest` to "fix" flakes

## Core Process

### Step 1: Identify critical user paths

Read `.forge/prd.md` if present. List the 3-7 user journeys that, if broken, ship a broken product. Each is an e2e candidate. Everything else is unit/integration.

### Step 2: Decide test level per path

| Level | Tests | When |
|-------|-------|------|
| Unit | Pure functions, business logic, transformations | Single module, no I/O |
| Integration | Module + its real adapter (real DB, real HTTP via testcontainers) | Boundaries, contracts |
| E2E | Full stack, real browser if frontend | Critical user paths only |

Default ratio: 70% unit / 20% integration / 10% e2e. Adjust based on what's risky.

### Step 3: Define mocking boundaries

The rule: **mock at the seam, not inside the module.**
- Mock the HTTP client, not your service-that-calls-HTTP
- Mock the message broker, not the consumer-that-uses-the-broker
- Mock time, randomness, and the file system at the lowest seam (injected clock, seeded RNG, in-memory FS)
- Never mock the database in integration tests — use testcontainers

### Step 4: Set per-component coverage targets

Not "80% across the project." Per-component:
- Pure business logic: 90%+ line + branch coverage
- Adapters (HTTP/DB clients): integration-test coverage (line % less meaningful)
- UI components: behavior coverage (clicks, keyboard, screen reader), not snapshot
- Glue code: lower bar, but every error path tested

Document each target in `.forge/testing-strategy.md` with rationale.

### Step 5: Write golden tests for invariants

Identify 3-10 invariants per critical module (e.g., "ownership isolation never broken", "no negative balance possible", "no orphan rows after delete"). Write a property/golden test per invariant. These survive refactors.

### Step 6: Define flake quarantine policy

When a test flakes:
1. Quarantine immediately (skip with TODO + owner + deadline).
2. Find root cause within 5 business days (timing? shared state? real bug?).
3. Re-enable only after the root cause is fixed.
4. Quarantine over 5 days = delete or rewrite.

No retry-on-fail config in CI. Flakes are bugs, not noise.

### Step 7: Define CI gates

In `.forge/testing-strategy.md`:
- Which tests run on every push, every PR, nightly
- Total CI budget (e.g., <10 min PR, <30 min nightly)
- What's allowed to block merge (failing tests, coverage drop on critical modules)
- What's monitoring-only (flake rate, suite duration trend)

### Step 8: Header

Prepend a `forge:meta` header to `.forge/testing-strategy.md` (`generated_by: testing-strategy`, `generated_at: <ISO 8601 UTC with Z>`, `depends_on: [.forge/prd.md]` — paths only, never hashes, `generated_from: {.forge/prd.md: <upstream content_hash AT generation time>}`, `content_hash: <sha256 first 8 of THIS file's body>`). See [forge-dependency-graph](../../references/forge-dependency-graph.md).

## Verification

- [ ] `.forge/testing-strategy.md` written with per-component coverage targets and rationale
- [ ] Critical user paths each have at least one e2e test
- [ ] Boundary modules (HTTP / DB / queue) have integration tests against real dependencies (testcontainers or similar)
- [ ] Pure logic modules have unit tests with >90% branch coverage
- [ ] No mock of an internal collaborator (only mocks at seams)
- [ ] No test takes >5 seconds without a documented exception
- [ ] Flake rate <1% over the trailing 30 days (or quarantine policy active)
- [ ] CI runs in <10 minutes for PRs
- [ ] No `retries: N` config used to mask flakes

Attribution

aneja5aneja5
View sourceSee grades on GitHubMore from aneja5 →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Clean Code

Pragmatic coding standards - concise, direct, no over-engineering, no unnecessary comments

304955 votes

Browser Extension Developer

Use this skill when developing or maintaining browser extension code in the `browser/` directory, including Chrome/Firefox/Edge compatibility, content scripts, background scripts, or i18n updates.

286712 votes

Seo Optimizer

SEO optimization with keyword analysis, readability assessment, technical validation, content quality. Use for search rankings, blog posts, content audits, or encountering keyword density, readability scores, meta tags, schema markup errors.

2222 votes

Google Official Seo Guide

Official Google SEO guide covering search optimization, best practices, Search Console, crawling, indexing, and improving website search visibility based on official Google documentation

1862 votes

Writing Plans

Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code

2927051 votes
View all in development →