Compare multiple job opportunities side by side. See scores, compensation, pros/cons, and a recommendation. Use when someone says 'compare my options', 'which job should I take', 'rank my opportunities', or 'compare these roles'.
Scanned 9/6/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add andrew-shwetzer/career-ops-plugin-do-not-fork-currently-updating-v2- --skill compare --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Compare?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/andrew-shwetzer-compare-career-ops-plugin-do-not-fork-)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: compare
description: "Compare multiple job opportunities side by side. See scores, compensation, pros/cons, and a recommendation. Use when someone says 'compare my options', 'which job should I take', 'rank my opportunities', or 'compare these roles'."
argument-hint: "[company names to compare, or 'my top options']"
user-invocable: true
allowed-tools:
- Read
- Glob
---
# Compare Opportunities
Side-by-side comparison of evaluated job opportunities.
## Step 0: Load Evaluations
Read all files in `data/evaluations/`. Parse the scores, archetype, company,
role, location, and compensation from each.
## Step 1: Select Opportunities
- If user specified companies/roles: match to evaluations (fuzzy OK)
- If "compare my top options" or no argument: select top 3-5 by score
with non-terminal status (Evaluated, Resume Ready, Applied, Interview)
- If fewer than 2 evaluations exist:
> "You need at least 2 evaluated jobs to compare. Evaluate more
> postings first by pasting a JD."
## Step 2: Comparison Table
```
## Opportunity Comparison
| Dimension | {Company A: Role} | {Company B: Role} | {Company C: Role} |
|---|---|---|---|
| **Score** | {X.X}/5.0 | {X.X}/5.0 | {X.X}/5.0 |
| **Archetype** | {type} | {type} | {type} |
| **Seniority** | {level} | {level} | {level} |
| **Location** | {loc} | {loc} | {loc} |
| **Compensation** | {range or "Not disclosed"} | {range} | {range} |
| **Strongest match** | {top requirement match} | ... | ... |
| **Biggest gap** | {main risk} | ... | ... |
| **Status** | {current status} | ... | ... |
```
## Step 3: Pros and Cons
For each opportunity, list 3 specific pros and 2 specific cons.
These must reference actual evaluation data, not generic statements.
```
### {Company A} - {Role}
**Pros:**
- {specific strength from Block B match}
- {compensation/location advantage}
- {career trajectory fit}
**Cons:**
- {specific gap or risk}
- {concern from evaluation}
```
## Step 4: Recommendation
```
## My Recommendation
**Best overall match:** {Company - Role} ({score}/5.0)
{2-3 sentences: why this one stands out, what makes it the strongest fit}
**Best growth opportunity:** {Company - Role}
{1-2 sentences: highest upside if you can close the gaps}
**Safest option:** {Company - Role}
{1-2 sentences: most likely to result in an offer}
```
If scores are very close (within 0.3), say so:
> "These are genuinely close. The tiebreaker is which company and role
> excites you most. Numbers can't measure that."
## Step 5: Next Steps
> "Want me to:
> - **Tailor a resume** for your top pick? Say 'tailor my resume for {company}'
> - **Research** any of these companies deeper? Say 'research {company}'
> - **Evaluate more** options? Paste another job posting"

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!