Prompt engineering patterns for writing agent prompts and skill files — constraint budgets, register shifting, HARD GATE patterns, anti-personas. Use when writing or reviewing agents/*.md or skills/*/SKILL.md. TRIGGER when: agent prompt, skill file, prompt engineering, model-tier compensation, HARD GATE, prompt quality. DO NOT TRIGGER when: user-facing docs, README, CHANGELOG, config files.
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add akaszubski/autonomous-dev --skill prompt-engineering --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Prompt Engineering?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/akaszubski-prompt-engineering)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: prompt-engineering
description: "Prompt engineering patterns for writing agent prompts and skill files — constraint budgets, register shifting, HARD GATE patterns, anti-personas. Use when writing or reviewing agents/*.md or skills/*/SKILL.md. TRIGGER when: agent prompt, skill file, prompt engineering, model-tier compensation, HARD GATE, prompt quality. DO NOT TRIGGER when: user-facing docs, README, CHANGELOG, config files."
allowed-tools: [Read, Grep, Glob]
---
# Prompt Engineering Patterns
Compact, actionable patterns for writing agent prompts and skill files. See [docs/PROMPT-ENGINEERING.md](../../docs/PROMPT-ENGINEERING.md) for full rationale and academic citations.
---
## Constraint Budget (MOSAIC finding)
| Range | Compliance |
|-------|-----------|
| 1–6 | Reliable |
| 7–15 | Unpredictable |
| >15 | Degraded |
**Rule**: Max 6 hard constraints per section. Hard gates at the END of sections (Claude recency effect).
---
## Register Shifting Checklist
Before finalizing any hard gate or enforcement directive, verify the verbs:
- [ ] Tier 1 (deep): `audit`, `verify`, `critically analyse`, `enumerate` — use for HARD GATEs
- [ ] Tier 2 (balanced): `review`, `check`, `describe` — use for standard task instructions
- [ ] Tier 3 (minimal): `look at`, `mention`, `note` — advisory only; never in enforcement
**FORBIDDEN**: Tier 3 verbs in REQUIRED or FORBIDDEN lists.
---
## Persona Anti-Pattern
**FORBIDDEN for analytical agents** (reviewers, auditors, analysts, planners):
- ❌ `You are a [role]...` persona prefixes
- ❌ `Act as an expert in...` framing
- ❌ `Imagine you are...` setups
**Source**: PRISM (arxiv:2603.18507) — expert personas reduce knowledge-retrieval accuracy for analytical tasks.
**Correct pattern**: Role description + behavioral directive.
```
# BAD
You are a senior security engineer. Review this code.
# GOOD
Perform a security audit. Enumerate all CWE categories present.
```
---
## HARD GATE Pattern Template
```markdown
### HARD GATE: [Topic]
**[One-sentence scope statement]**
**REQUIRED** (all must be met):
- Specific action A
- Specific action B
**FORBIDDEN** — You MUST NOT do any of the following:
- ❌ You MUST NOT [prohibited action]
- ❌ You MUST NOT [prohibited action]
**Why**: [One sentence — increases compliance]
```
---
## Model-Tier Compensation Template
```xml
<model-tier-compensation tier="[haiku|sonnet|opus]">
## Model-Tier Behavioral Constraints ([Tier Name])
- Do NOT [specific tendency to suppress].
- ALWAYS [specific required behavior].
</model-tier-compensation>
```
Rules:
- Include `tier` attribute for automated validation
- No meta-commentary about model weaknesses (model-visible; may reinforce behavior)
- Actionable directives only — positive framing where possible
- Place at TOP of agent prompt before role description
---
## Self-Refine Loop (when quality matters)
Use for planning, security scans, and architecture tasks. 2–3 passes optimal (NeurIPS 2023).
```markdown
## Pass 1: GENERATE
[Initial output]
## Pass 2: FEEDBACK
Critically analyse Pass 1. Enumerate:
- Gaps (missing)
- Errors (wrong)
- Ambiguities (unclear)
## Pass 3: REFINE
Apply Pass 2 feedback. Produce final output.
```
**Anti-pattern**: "Review your answer and improve it" — Tier 3, will be ignored. Use Tier 1: "Critically analyse for gaps and enumerate missing cases."
---
## Stick+Carrot Pattern
Every block (hook or agent) MUST include a required next action:
```
# STICK only (bad)
BLOCKED: Cannot edit agents/*.md outside the pipeline.
# STICK + CARROT (good)
BLOCKED: Cannot edit agents/*.md outside the pipeline.
REQUIRED NEXT ACTION: Use /implement to run the pipeline with your changes.
```
Hook JSON format:
```json
{
"decision": "block",
"reason": "What failed and why.",
"requiredNextAction": "Specific step to take next."
}
```
---
## Anti-Patterns Summary
| Anti-Pattern | Why Wrong | Fix |
|-------------|-----------|-----|
| `>15 constraints` per section | MOSAIC: degraded compliance | Split into subsections ≤6 each |
| Persona prefix for analytical tasks | PRISM: reduces accuracy | Role description + directive |
| Hedge words in hard gates | Weakens enforcement | Delete or replace with MUST |
| Prose-buried constraints | Low compliance | Convert to numbered list |
| Meta-commentary about model weaknesses | May reinforce behavior | Reframe as behavioral directive |
| Block without carrot | Model loops | Add REQUIRED NEXT ACTION |
---
## Cross-Reference
See [docs/PROMPT-ENGINEERING.md](../../docs/PROMPT-ENGINEERING.md) for:
- Full MOSAIC constraint budget analysis
- PRISM persona findings detail
- Self-Refine NeurIPS 2023 citations
- XML sectioning rationale
- Complete anti-pattern catalog
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!