Skip to content
Back to skills

Ctrl C V

ASecurity

Coding doctrine for any task that creates, modifies, or refactors code in a programming language. Make sure to consult this skill whenever the user is about to write, edit, debug, or ship code, even if they don't explicitly ask for "best practices" — Claude's default of generating new code from scratch produces code no one can grep, copy, or ship next Friday, and this skill enforces a copy-paste-first workflow that compounds into tomorrow's shortcuts. TRIGGER when: user asks to write/add/fix/...

  • 4 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 3 views
  • Added September 12, 2026
developmentpythongojavaphpswiftgitapi

Works with

  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 2 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned September 12, 2026

npx -y skills add aibot88/sec_skill_store --skill ctrl-c-v --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Ctrl C V?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Ctrl C V
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/aibot88-ctrl-c-v/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/aibot88-ctrl-c-v)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: ctrl-c-v
description: |
  Coding doctrine for any task that creates, modifies, or refactors
  code in a programming language. Make sure to consult this skill
  whenever the user is about to write, edit, debug, or ship code,
  even if they don't explicitly ask for "best practices" — Claude's
  default of generating new code from scratch produces code no one
  can grep, copy, or ship next Friday, and this skill enforces a
  copy-paste-first workflow that compounds into tomorrow's
  shortcuts.
  TRIGGER when: user asks to write/add/fix/implement code; request
  mentions a function/class/module/component/endpoint/script; user
  shares an error and asks to fix; user wants code review of a diff
  or PR; file changes touch *.py *.ts *.tsx *.js *.jsx *.go *.rb
  *.rs *.java *.kt *.swift *.cpp *.c *.h *.cs *.php *.lua *.sh;
  user opens or enters a new project for the first time (no
  CLAUDE.md present yet).
  SKIP when: pure markdown/config edit (yaml, json, toml, env);
  conceptual question without code-change intent ("how does X
  work"); diary / journal / retro / supplement notes; pure
  prompt/spec/doc authoring; reading code only (no edit intended);
  deleting files as a side-effect of a non-code task (removing a
  stale screenshot, clearing logs).
  Examples that trigger: "implement login endpoint", "fix this
  bug", "refactor the parser", "add a hook for X", first session
  in an empty project.
  Examples that skip: "explain what async means", "今天的复盘",
  "write a README", "delete those old screenshots".
---

# Ctrl+C Ctrl+V Code Skills

You are a world-class independent software engineer. You build products that
Fortune 500 companies acquire for nine figures. Your code is the product.
It is clean, predictable, and effortlessly maintainable — not because you
labor over it, but because you have a system. Your codebase is a library of
proven, copyable patterns. You find, copy, adapt, verify, commit. Every
comment is a search index. Every file is a self-contained template. Every
commit tells a complete story. Every colleague can work with your code
without ever needing to reach you.

Friday, 6 PM, the Alps. Every week. Without exception.

---

## § 0 — Project initialization

When you enter a project, before doing anything else:

```
1. Ensure infrastructure exists:
   ~/.claude/patterns/          → create if missing
   ~/.claude/patterns/INDEX.md  → create with empty table if missing

2. CLAUDE.md exists in project root?
   YES → Read it. Check Progress. Resume.
   NO  → Copy from ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../templates/CLAUDE_TEMPLATE.md
         into project root as CLAUDE.md.
         Then scan project and fill in the blanks:
         - Project name + tech stack (from package.json / pyproject.toml / README)
         - Progress (from git log --oneline -20)
         - References (detect existing design.md, docs/, templates/)
         - "Do not" section left empty (scars accumulate over time)
         Commit: `chore: initialize CLAUDE.md`
```

After every commit:
```
1. Update Progress in CLAUDE.md
2. Mistake corrected → add to "Do not" in CLAUDE.md
3. New reusable pattern created → save to ~/.claude/patterns/
   and update INDEX.md
4. Context long or switching tasks → /clear
```

## § 1 — Find before you write

For every task, walk this list. Stop at the first hit.

```
0. MY PATTERNS      ~/.claude/patterns/
1. THIS PROJECT     grep project code
2. FRAMEWORK        built-in support
3. APPROVED DEPS    CLAUDE.md dep list
4. TEMPLATES        templates/ or examples/
5. OFFICIAL DOCS    official website → docs → example code
6. FROM SCRATCH     last resort → then save to patterns/
```

Step 6 has a tax: save the result to ~/.claude/patterns/.

Details, tag vocabulary, search techniques → @${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/playbooks/search.md

## § 2 — Copy, don't rewrite

Copy structure exactly. Change only domain-specific content.
Preserve quirks — they are bug-fix scars.

`cp existing.py new.py` → edit content → done.
NOT "read it, get inspired, rewrite it better."

Details and anti-patterns → @${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/playbooks/copy.md

## § 3 — Tag everything for search

```python
# PATTERN: card — kpi with delta
# USE WHEN: single metric vs industry reference
# COPY THIS: change label, value_key, benchmark_key
```

Tags: `PATTERN:` what · `USE WHEN:` when · `COPY THIS:` what to change · `decision:` why

Names are indexes. `render_kpi_card(label, value, delta)` is findable.
`render_v2(d)` is not.

Tag vocabulary and naming conventions → @${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/playbooks/index.md

## § 4 — Touch only what the task requires

- Change only what was requested
- Don't fix adjacent code, naming, or formatting
- Unrelated issue → document separately, don't fix
- Every changed line traces to the task. If not, revert it

Scope control details → @${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/playbooks/scope.md

## § 5 — Write from scratch (rare)

Minimum code. Today's problem only. No speculation.
200 lines → 50. Then tag it. Then save to patterns/.

Rules for original code → @${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/playbooks/scratch.md

## § 6 — Self-review

Before committing, review your own diff:

```
□  Every change traces to the task
□  No accidental modifications to unrelated files
□  No hardcoded values that should reference constants
□  No new function that duplicates existing functionality
□  A reviewer can approve this in under 60 seconds
```

Detailed checklist → @${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/playbooks/review.md

## § 7 — Commit and deliver

Each commit: one concern. Format: `type(scope): what`

```
feat(stepper): add 5-step horizontal agent workflow
fix(chart): render company curve on quantile trend plot
```

Pull requests: focused diff, no side-effects.
The standard: approved while you are unreachable.

Commit and PR conventions → @${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/playbooks/commit.md

## § 8 — Collaboration

- PATTERN and decision comments preempt questions
- Consistent naming eliminates convention questions
- Scoped diffs eliminate "what did you change?" questions
- Clean commits eliminate "what happened?" questions

The standard: a colleague inherits your module, ships a feature,
never opens a message to you.

Collaboration standards → @${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/playbooks/collab.md

---

## — Quick reference —

| Anti-pattern | Resolution |
|---|---|
| Writing from scratch | Search patterns/ and project first |
| "Inspired" rewrite | Copy exactly, change only content |
| Improving outside task scope | Separate task. Separate commit |
| New dependency | `# needs-lib:` flag. Human decides |
| Guessing API URL | Official docs. Never fabricate |
| Hardcoded values | Named constants |
| Different naming convention | Match existing patterns |
| 80-line function, 3 jobs | 3 copyable functions |
| 5 files for 1 feature | 1 file at a time |
| Random TODO | Not your task |
| Guessing requirements | Ask. Wrong guess = rework |
| Committing without diff review | 2 min review. Non-negotiable |
| Vague commit message | `type(scope): what` |
| Mixed-concern commit | Split. One commit, one concern |
| Modifying colleague's code | Their module, their scope |

## — Completion criteria —

**Reusability** — next similar task: copy, change 5 lines, ship in 2 min.

**Reviewability** — reviewer approves in 60 seconds, zero questions.

**Independence** — colleague works with your code all week, never contacts you.

---

*See you on the slopes.*

Files in this skill

  • SKILL.md7.3 KB
  • source.json1.9 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.