Binary hardening skill for security-hardened C/C++ builds. Use when enabling RELRO, PIE, stack canaries, FORTIFY_SOURCE, CFI sanitizers, shadow stack, or seccomp-bpf syscall filtering. Covers checksec analysis, compiler and linker flags for hardened builds, and NSA/CISA-recommended mitigations. Activates on queries about binary hardening, checksec, RELRO, PIE, stack canaries, FORTIFY_SOURCE, CFI, shadow stack, or seccomp.
Scanned 9/12/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add aibot88/sec_skill_store --skill binary-hardening --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Binary Hardening?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/aibot88-binary-hardening)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: binary-hardening
description: Binary hardening skill for security-hardened C/C++ builds. Use when enabling RELRO, PIE, stack canaries, FORTIFY_SOURCE, CFI sanitizers, shadow stack, or seccomp-bpf syscall filtering. Covers checksec analysis, compiler and linker flags for hardened builds, and NSA/CISA-recommended mitigations. Activates on queries about binary hardening, checksec, RELRO, PIE, stack canaries, FORTIFY_SOURCE, CFI, shadow stack, or seccomp.
---
# Binary Hardening
## Purpose
Guide agents through enabling and verifying binary security mitigations: checksec analysis, compiler and linker hardening flags (RELRO, PIE, stack canaries, FORTIFY_SOURCE, CFI), hardware shadow stack, and seccomp-bpf syscall filtering for defense-in-depth.
## Triggers
- "How do I harden my binary against exploits?"
- "How do I check what security mitigations my binary has?"
- "What does checksec output mean?"
- "How do I enable RELRO, PIE, and stack canaries?"
- "How do I use seccomp to restrict syscalls?"
- "How do I enable CFI (control flow integrity)?"
## Workflow
### 1. Analyze existing binary with checksec
```bash
# Install checksec
pip install checksec.py # or: apt install checksec
# Check a binary
checksec --file=./mybinary
checksec --file=/usr/bin/ssh
# Output example
# RELRO STACK CANARY NX PIE RPATH RUNPATH Symbols FORTIFY Fortified Fortifiable FILE
# Full RELRO Canary found NX PIE No RPATH No RUNPATH No Symbols Yes 6 10 ./mybinary
# Check all binaries in a directory
checksec --dir=/usr/bin
```
| Protection | Good value | Concern |
|-----------|-----------|---------|
| RELRO | Full RELRO | Partial / No RELRO |
| Stack Canary | Canary found | No canary |
| NX | NX enabled | NX disabled |
| PIE | PIE enabled | No PIE |
| FORTIFY | Yes | No |
### 2. Hardening compiler and linker flags
```bash
# Full hardened build (GCC or Clang)
CFLAGS="-O2 -pipe \
-fstack-protector-strong \
-fstack-clash-protection \
-fcf-protection \
-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 \
-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS \
-fPIE \
-Wformat -Wformat-security -Werror=format-security"
LDFLAGS="-pie \
-Wl,-z,relro \
-Wl,-z,now \
-Wl,-z,noexecstack \
-Wl,-z,separate-code"
gcc ${CFLAGS} -o prog main.c ${LDFLAGS}
```
Flag reference:
| Flag | Protection | Notes |
|------|-----------|-------|
| `-fstack-protector-strong` | Stack canary | Stronger than `-fstack-protector` |
| `-fstack-clash-protection` | Stack clash | Prevents huge stack allocations |
| `-fcf-protection` | Intel CET (IBT+SHSTK) | x86 hardware CFI (kernel+CPU required) |
| `-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2` | Buffer overflow checks | Adds bounds checks to string/mem functions |
| `-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3` | Enhanced FORTIFY | GCC ≥12, Clang ≥12 |
| `-fPIE` + `-pie` | PIE/ASLR | Position independent executable |
| `-Wl,-z,relro` | Partial RELRO | Makes GOT read-only before `main` |
| `-Wl,-z,now` | Full RELRO | Resolves all PLT at startup → GOT fully RO |
| `-Wl,-z,noexecstack` | NX stack | Marks stack non-executable |
### 3. Control Flow Integrity (CFI)
Clang's CFI prevents calling virtual functions through wrong types (vtable CFI) and indirect calls to mismatched functions:
```bash
# Clang CFI — requires LTO and visibility
clang -fsanitize=cfi -fvisibility=hidden -flto \
-O2 -fPIE -pie main.cpp -o prog
# Specific CFI checks
clang -fsanitize=cfi-vcall # virtual call type check
clang -fsanitize=cfi-icall # indirect call type check
clang -fsanitize=cfi-derived-cast # derived-to-base cast
clang -fsanitize=cfi-unrelated-cast # unrelated type cast
# Cross-DSO CFI (across shared libraries — more complex)
clang -fsanitize=cfi -fsanitize-cfi-cross-dso -flto -fPIC -shared
```
```bash
# Microsoft CFG (Windows equivalent)
cl /guard:cf prog.c
link /guard:cf prog.obj
```
### 4. Stack canaries in depth
```bash
# GCC canary options
-fno-stack-protector # disabled
-fstack-protector # protect functions with alloca or buffers > 8 bytes
-fstack-protector-strong # protect functions with local arrays/addresses taken
-fstack-protector-all # protect all functions (slowest, most complete)
# Verify canary presence
objdump -d prog | grep -A5 "__stack_chk"
readelf -s prog | grep "stack_chk"
```
### 5. FORTIFY_SOURCE
FORTIFY_SOURCE wraps unsafe libc functions (memcpy, strcpy, sprintf) with bounds-checked versions when the buffer size can be determined at compile time:
```bash
# Level 2 (GCC/Clang default for hardened builds)
-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
# Runtime check: abort() on overflow
# Level 3 (GCC ≥12, catches more cases)
-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3
# Adds dynamic buffer size tracking for more coverage
# Check FORTIFY coverage
objdump -d prog | grep "__.*_chk" # fortified variants
checksec --file=prog | grep FORTIFY
```
### 6. seccomp-bpf syscall filtering
```c
#include <seccomp.h>
void apply_seccomp_filter(void) {
scmp_filter_ctx ctx;
// Default: kill process on any non-allowlisted syscall
ctx = seccomp_init(SCMP_ACT_KILL_PROCESS);
// Allowlist needed syscalls
seccomp_rule_add(ctx, SCMP_ACT_ALLOW, SCMP_SYS(read), 0);
seccomp_rule_add(ctx, SCMP_ACT_ALLOW, SCMP_SYS(write), 0);
seccomp_rule_add(ctx, SCMP_ACT_ALLOW, SCMP_SYS(exit_group), 0);
seccomp_rule_add(ctx, SCMP_ACT_ALLOW, SCMP_SYS(brk), 0);
seccomp_rule_add(ctx, SCMP_ACT_ALLOW, SCMP_SYS(mmap), 0);
// Apply filter (irreversible after this point)
seccomp_load(ctx);
seccomp_release(ctx);
}
// Call early in main(), after all setup
int main(void) {
// ... initialization ...
apply_seccomp_filter();
// ... restricted operation ...
}
```
```bash
# Test seccomp filter with strace
strace -e trace=all ./prog 2>&1 | grep "killed by SIGSYS"
# Profile syscalls to build allowlist
strace -c ./prog # count all syscalls used
```
### 7. Shadow stack (Intel CET / Hardware SHSTK)
```bash
# Enable on supported x86 hardware (Intel Tiger Lake+, kernel ≥6.6)
# -fcf-protection=full enables both IBT and SHSTK
clang -fcf-protection=full -O2 -o prog main.c
# Check CET support in binary
readelf -n prog | grep "NT_GNU_PROPERTY"
objdump -d prog | grep "endbr64" # IBT end-branch instructions
# Kernel support
cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep shstk # CPU support
```
For the full hardening flags reference, see [references/hardening-flags.md](references/hardening-flags.md).
## Related skills
- Use `skills/runtimes/sanitizers` for ASan/UBSan during development
- Use `skills/observability/ebpf` for seccomp-bpf program writing with libbpf
- Use `skills/rust/rust-security` for Rust's memory-safety hardening approach
- Use `skills/binaries/elf-inspection` to verify mitigations in ELF binaries
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!