This document is a living reference. It captures how Amit actually writes — derived from real samples that performed well — and what that means for writing blogs, LinkedIn posts, and newsletters that sound like him.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Amit Srivatsa Personal Website Old .Agent?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/aibot88-amit-srivatsa-personal-website-old-agent)
---
name: writing-skill
description: This document is a living reference. It captures how Amit actually writes — derived from real samples that performed well — and what that means for writing blogs, LinkedIn posts, and newsletters that sound like him.
---
# Blog Writing Skill — Amit Srivatsa
Can be invoked by asking the agent to "write like amit / write like me / in my voice " etc.
---
## The core standard
Every piece of writing must pass this test:
> "Does this sound like something Amit said out loud to a friend who's smart but not in his industry?"
If it reads like an article, it's not ready.
If it sounds like a consultant, start over.
If there's no real moment or tension in it, it's missing something essential.
---
## What Amit's voice actually sounds like
These patterns are extracted from LinkedIn posts that genuinely performed well — posts Amit wrote from scratch.
### 1. Opens with a real moment, not a thesis
Amit never starts with the point. He starts with something that happened.
Good:
> "Last month I signed a client without speaking their language."
> "I was talking to a friend yesterday."
> "Last week, I got a job. And I stopped writing."
Bad (avoid):
> "Fast learners use three key strategies."
> "In today's competitive landscape..."
> "Most people believe X. Here's the truth."
The opening should feel like someone leaning across a table.
---
### 2. Short sentences. Sometimes very short.
Amit's rhythm is staccato when it matters most.
> "They slash. They kill darlings. They cut what's no longer serving the story."
> "But a well-written email? That's progress… with a 'send' button."
> "I broke my chain. I'm starting again today."
Rule: If a sentence is longer than 20 words, ask if it can be two sentences.
---
### 3. "I" is not optional — specificity is the point
Amit names the café (Banhmi & Caphe). He names the people (Nhu and Son). He names the subscription (Chess.com premium). He says "Me?" before answering his own question.
Vague universals kill trust. Specific details build it.
Bad: "A friend of mine told me she felt burned out."
Good: "I was talking to a friend yesterday. They told me they felt bored, restless, and a bit 'off' at work."
When writing blogs, always anchor the central idea in a real, specific experience.
---
### 4. Bridges personal → universal without being preachy
Amit moves from "this happened to me" to "here's what it means for you" without a lecture. The transition is quiet and natural.
He doesn't say: "This taught me an important lesson about resilience."
He says: "For a lot of people who want to quit their job, their job isn't really the problem."
The reader arrives at the universal insight themselves. Amit just points the way.
---
### 5. Analogies are earthy, not academic
Amit's analogies come from everyday life, not business textbooks.
- "one tool to do the work of an entire toolbox"
- "Emails are like burritos. They only work if everything's wrapped neatly."
- "Consistency is like brushing teeth. Miss one day, it's fine. Miss a week, and it stinks."
- "aged like milk"
If the analogy sounds like it belongs in a HBR piece, find a simpler one.
---
### 6. Contrarian hooks that are honest, not clickbait
Amit uses tension and contradiction — but it's always earned, not manufactured.
> "I have nearly 10 years of experience in marketing, and here's why you shouldn't hire me!"
> "Consistency doesn't break with failure. It breaks with comfort."
> "Most meetings are just group procrastination in disguise."
The hook should create a "wait, what?" moment — then immediately deliver on it. Never bait-and-switch.
---
### 7. Ends with a real question, not a CTA in disguise
Amit's closing questions feel like genuine curiosity, not a growth hack.
Good:
> "What's your trick to staying consistent when things are going well?"
> "Which of your goals are you ready to rewrite?"
> "What's the most effective email you've ever written?"
Bad (avoid):
> "Drop me a DM if you want to learn more."
> "Follow for more insights like this."
> "What do you think? Let me know in the comments below!"
---
### 8. Self-aware, light humor
Amit's funny without trying to be funny. It's usually a throwaway line or a small moment of self-awareness.
> "this is a metaphor, I will get to it later 😄"
> "Be the burrito artist. Not the soup slinger."
> "11 goals. That's not a roadmap: that's a wish list."
Don't force it. It lands when it's incidental.
---
### 9. Vulnerability is a feature, not a weakness
Amit admits when he failed, stopped, got comfortable, made mistakes.
> "Last week, I got a job. And I stopped writing. I didn't plan to."
> "I had 11 goals. I am picking only 3 of them."
This is what makes the writing trustworthy. It's not performance — it reads as actual reflection.
---
## Rules for blog writing (derived from samples)
1. **Open with a real moment.** Something that happened. A conversation. A decision. A failure.
2. **State the tension early.** What did you believe before? What did you discover? What's the friction?
3. **Use one anchor analogy.** Earn it. Don't force multiple.
4. **Write at the level of a smart friend, not a consultant.**
5. **Every section must earn its place.** If it adds length without insight, cut it.
6. **No decorative emojis.** Emojis are okay in LinkedIn posts where they aid scannability. Not in long-form essays.
7. **End with a question that you're actually curious about.**
8. **Read it out loud before publishing.** If it sounds stiff, rewrite.
9. **The 60-second test applies to your own drafts:** if you can't summarize the single insight in 60 seconds without notes, the piece isn't clear yet.
---
## Rules for LinkedIn posts (derived from samples)
1. Hook in the first line — not a thesis, a moment or a provocation.
2. Short paragraphs. One idea per paragraph.
3. Use line breaks aggressively for rhythm.
4. Numbered lists are fine — but each point needs a human sentence, not a label.
5. End with a real question. No "follow for more."
6. Emojis: 1-2 per post max, only where they add visual clarity or a light tone shift.
7. Write the post, then delete the first line. Often the second line is the real hook.
---
## Rules for newsletter emails (derived from Public Thinking System)
1. Plain or near-plain text. No heavy formatting.
2. One central idea. One primary link.
3. Send only when there is genuine signal. Silence is acceptable.
4. The newsletter is a memory mechanism — write it like a letter to someone who knows you.
5. No promotional tone. No "in this edition."
6. Maximum frequency: once per week. No pressure to fill that slot.
---
## The gap to close in the current blog
The fast learners blog needs a rewrite pass to:
- Add a personal opening moment (a specific experience where Amit noticed the difference between how he learned and how others did)
- Remove or replace the institutional critique section with something earned
- Strip all decorative emojis
- Rewrite the closing question to feel genuine
- Bring the 60-second test section earlier — it's the heart of the piece
This is not a teardown. The ideas are good. The voice just needs to be restored.
---
*Last updated: February 2026. Grow this document as new samples are analyzed and new learnings emerge.*