All categories
Code Review & Quality
Code review, refactoring, debugging, maintainability, and engineering quality
- 15,938
- 665
Security grades appear on each card once the skill has been scanned. Newly imported skills may briefly show without a grade until the backfill job runs.
Open in full browserBrowse code review & quality skills
Showing 15,073–15,096 of 15,938 skills
- React Change ReviewReview a React or TypeScript UI diff for concrete behavior, accessibility, and performance risks. Use when a React review or hardening pass is requested.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 47
- Review PrDiff-aware PR security review with verified findings and PR comment payload.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 24
- Senior EngineeringEngineering principles for building software like a senior engineer. Load when tackling non-trivial development work, architecting systems, reviewing code, or orchestrating multi-agent builds. Covers planning, delivery, quality gates, and LLM-specific patterns.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 241
- Game Code ReviewInvoke when the user wants a game-specific code review, architecture check, or technical analysis of game code. Covers frame independence, hot path performance, state machine integrity, and resource lifecycle. Triggers on: "code review", "review my code", "check architecture", "game code quality". Do NOT invoke for design document review (use game-design-review) or general sprint planning (use game-sprint-plan). Part of the AlterLab GameForge collection.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 34
- Checking Code QualityChecks code quality metrics including complexity, duplication, naming conventions, and function length. Use when running quality gates, reviewing code smells, or checking lint rules. Automatically triggered on complex modules or post-refactor.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 239
- Analyzing ChangesAnalyzes code changes, detects documentation drift, and evaluates change impact scope. Use when reviewing diffs, checking doc sync, or running pre-commit analysis. Automatically triggered after design-level changes or refactoring.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 239
- ReviewDispatched after a task lands at `in_review` to produce a structured CTO-grade verdict on the work and its PR. Two invocation paths: composer Phase 4 (orchestrator dispatches after the implementer's `in_review` write, surfaces the verdict to HOTL, stops), and direct mode from the mymir skill on natural-language requests ("review MYMR-N", "review this PR", "review <PR URL>"). Reads `mymir_context depth='review'` for the implementationPlan rendered alongside executionRecord, plan-vs-files drift...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 192
- Pr To Go LinterGenerate a new pkg/linters analyzer from a merged or open PR pattern.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 5,344
- Replication PackageAssemble a journal-ready replication archive for a quantitative-marketing paper, scanning for secrets, PII, and absolute local paths before the zip is built. TRIGGER on "/replication-package", "build a replication package", "data availability statement", "zip up the code and data for submission", a data-editor email asking what to send, or any "gather everything a replicator would need" request.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 25
- Go LintersAdd and validate custom Go analysis linters in gh-aw.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 5,344
- Review ReleasePre-release readiness review. Scans for debug artifacts, version mismatches, changelog gaps, git hygiene issues, breaking changes, and license compliance. Runs tests and build verification. Presents consolidated findings for human review before release.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 18
- Review HealthFirst-pass strategic-orientation review of a repository. Produces an evidence-cited map (not a grade) calibrated to a reference class, helping the user decide where to engage, where to tread carefully, and where to leave alone. Advisory only — no changes made.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 18
- Review ArchArchitectural review workflow. Analyzes codebase organization via noun analysis and produces a target blueprint. Advisory only — does not implement changes. Always offers to cut tickets for the planned work; orchestrators receive the proposal and apply their own autonomy judgment to approve / edit / decline.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 18
- Review A11yAccessibility audit. Dispatches an accessibility auditor to identify WCAG conformance gaps, prioritize by user impact, and recommend fixes. Advisory only — no changes made.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 18
- Lead ReviewAutonomous comprehensive review. Once-through pipeline over /review-health, /review-arch, /review-security, /review-perf, /review-a11y, /review-test, /review-release. Operator-configurable ticket creation at startup — when ON, auto-approves sub-skill ticket proposals per the orchestrator-family contract; when OFF, uniformly declines and surfaces findings in the consolidated report. Auto-detects sub-skills that do not apply (no web content → skip /review-a11y; no tests → skip /review-test).Votes: 0GitHub stars: 18
- Lead RefactorAutonomous comprehensive refactoring. Three-phase pipeline — Phase 1 /refactor (tactical, loops internally to convergence) → Phase 2 loop of /review-arch + /implement-batch until architectural findings converge below a severity floor (default HIGH+) → Phase 3 /refactor (catches tactical issues introduced by restructuring). Auto-approves /review-arch ticket proposals; pulls the andon cord on contested findings, breaking-change proposals, repeated implementation failure, or Phase-2 hard-cap exh...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 18
- Lead Bug HuntAutonomous bug-elimination loop. Iteratively invokes /bug-hunt and /implement-batch until findings converge below an operator-specified severity floor. At termination, runs /review-test scoped to the run's new reproducing tests and fixes quality issues above the floor. Auto-approves /bug-hunt and /review-test ticket proposals; pulls the andon cord on contested findings, repeated implementation failure, hard-cap exhaustion, or breaking-change proposals. Optional /refactor finisher.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 18
- Bug HuntProactive bug-hunting workflow. Assesses codebase risk through complexity, coverage, and structural analysis, then spawns focused investigators that write reproducing tests to validate suspected bugs. Thoroughness over speed. Advisory only — produces findings and proposes tickets; does not implement fixes.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 18
- Verification QualityComprehensive truth scoring, code quality verification, and automatic rollback system with 0.95 accuracy threshold for ensuring high-quality agent outputs and codebase reliability.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 351
- Github Code ReviewComprehensive GitHub code review with AI-powered swarm coordinationVotes: 0GitHub stars: 351
- Pdlc Review代码评审 + 文档评审Votes: 0GitHub stars: 16
- Pdlc Refactor代码重构（保持外部行为不变，改善内部结构）Votes: 0GitHub stars: 16
- Pdlc Perf性能优化Votes: 0GitHub stars: 16
- Pdlc Lint代码质量检查与自动修复Votes: 0GitHub stars: 16