All categories
Code Review & Quality
Code review, refactoring, debugging, maintainability, and engineering quality
- 14,946
- 623
Security grades appear on each card once the skill has been scanned. Newly imported skills may briefly show without a grade until the backfill job runs.
Open in full browserBrowse code review & quality skills
Showing 14,425–14,448 of 14,946 skills
- Quality Assurance代码审查、质量验收、集成测试、性能测试、交付把关Votes: 0GitHub stars: 10
- Git WorkflowUse when committing code, pushing branches, writing .gitignore entries, or generating PR metadata. Covers commit format, branch rules, and artifact exclusion.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 101
- Issue Triage对收到的 issue (bug report / feature request / discussion) 进行系统化核对， 在推荐解决方案前验证版本、代码路径、in-flight 分支和复现情况。 产出结构化 triage-report.json 和 triage-comment.md 草稿。 使用场景："triage 这个 issue"、"核对 #101"、"issue 分析"、 "收到 bug report 需要核对"、"是否已有 in-flight 修复"Votes: 0GitHub stars: 2
- Memesh ReviewReview and optimize the MeMesh memory database. Analyzes health score, finds stale or noisy memories, shows work patterns, and suggests human-reviewed cleanup actions. Use when asked to "review memories", "check memory health", "clean up knowledge", or "what's in my memory".Votes: 0GitHub stars: 16
- EvaluatorTandemKit Evaluator — verify the Generator's work against the spec with Codex as a second opinion. Fully autonomous. Invoked explicitly.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 39
- Lint PyRun lints on Python files.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 903
- Commit HelperGenerate a conventional-commit message from staged changes.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 903
- Quality GateProduction quality gate for agent sessions. Activates on session stop to evaluate work quality using 4-dimension weighted scoring (completeness, honesty, deferral ratio, work evidence). Catches rationalization patterns, verifies test claims, and generates handoff artifacts for session continuity. Use sprint contracts to define done-criteria before building.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 302
- Faces ReviewReview Jakarta Faces code for common mistakes, anti-patterns, and rule violationsVotes: 0GitHub stars: 25
- Contextual CommitWrite contextual commits that capture intent, decisions, and constraints alongside code changes. Use when committing code, finishing a task, or when the user asks to commit. Extends Conventional Commits with structured action lines in the commit body that preserve WHY code was written, not just WHAT changed.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 152
- JspecifyUse this skill when asked to perform any of the following actions in a Java project: - To add jspecify support - To prevent NullPointerExceptions - To better handle Nullability This skill will add jspecify dependency, configure Maven or Gradle build to automatically use jspecify for checking Nullability issues.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 187
- Review Pull RequestReview Jenkins plugin pull requests for common merge risks, including security, Jenkins extension patterns, compatibility, UI/CSP, dependencies, tests, documentation, and CI status. Use for general PR review without hardcoding project-specific files or feature rules.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 46
- Feedback ProtocolProtocol for @feedback annotations in source code. Use when user mentions @feedback, address feedbacks, inline feedback, or when encountering @feedback markers during any task.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 2
- ai-collab-bridgeA collaboration protocol for Claude, Codex, and other CLI-capable AI models to review each other's code via CLI handoffs. Use this skill whenever the user mentions AI-to-AI collaboration, Claude-Codex bridge, peer review between AI models, "let Claude check what Codex did", "have Codex verify Claude's work", multi-agent code review, AI handoff, two AIs reviewing each other, or wants two different AI models to verify each other's output before completing a task. Also use whenever you (the runn...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 8
- crossfireUse when 需要多文件代码实现并要求异源模型（Claude + Codex）交叉审查，或架构方案需要对抗性质询验证。适用于大型编码任务的端到端协作，不适用于单文件小修改或纯数据处理。Votes: 0GitHub stars: 2
- Rails Best Practices SkillA comprehensive skill that helps Claude review, analyze, and generate Ruby on Rails code according to established best practices.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 3
- CdpLive-debug a running Node.js service via Chrome DevTools Protocol. Use this skill whenever the user says 'debug', 'set a breakpoint', 'investigate runtime', 'inspect at runtime', 'why is variable Y wrong', or asks to attach to a running container/process to step through real execution. Works on any Node.js project (NestJS, ts-node, plain Node, compiled to dist/) that has a `.vscode/launch.json` with an `attach` config — the skill discovers the inspector port, container name, and source-map se...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 2
- deslop-ai-lint-skillReview text for "AI slop" — the formulaic, hedge-heavy, low-information-density style that machine-generated or AI-assisted writing tends to produce — and either return a structured report of flagged spans or rewrite the text to remove the slop. Use this skill whenever the user asks to check for AI slop, "de-sloppify" or "de-slop" something, flag writing that "sounds AI-generated," review a draft doc/README/commit message/PR description/comment for AI tone, polish a draft before publishing, o...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 3
- hardenEvidence-driven codebase hardening. Audits security (OWASP Top 10:2025), supply chain (inventory vs SBOM vs SLSA v1.2), reliability (OTel + operational limits), tests (sandboxed tiers), and accessibility triage (WCAG 2.2 AA, handed off to the wcag skill for browser verification). Audit discipline follows the Cloudflare security-audit skill: coverage ledger, candidate gate, independent verification. Every finding is quoted, matrix-scored, and cited. Does not fix. Reports with file:line and a v...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 3
- Plan Review TriggersRequired reading whenever drafting any multi-step proposal, implementation plan, refactor approach, or response containing file paths and decision points. Use BEFORE writing any response that lists 3+ file paths, 2+ option-tradeoffs, a "Plan:"/"Steps:"/"Concrete changes:" section, or ends with "OK to proceed?" / "sound good?" / "shall I…?". Use whenever the user says "draft a plan", "let's plan X", "what's the approach", "give me options", "how should we tackle this", "what would it look like...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 98
- Torvalds DoctrineAggressive AI coding guidelines inspired by Linus Torvalds. Enforce data structure supremacy, simple code, proof over hand-waving, and a bogus-shit detector.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 282
- Code Parser SkillUse this skill whenever you need to read, understand, navigate, edit, refactor, or reason about a codebase written in Dart, Python, or TypeScript — especially before reading any source files directly. This skill runs `code-parser` to build a lightweight structural index (classes, methods, line ranges) of the codebase first, then uses that index to read only the specific lines that matter. This drastically reduces token consumption and prevents context window overflow. Trigger this skill when...Votes: 0GitHub stars: 4
- think-like-mePersonal engineering rules and reasoning patterns the user has curated over time. Consult BEFORE writing, modifying, debugging, or designing any technical feature — rules often cover domain-specific gotchas (e.g., mobile audio timers need background mode) that generic answers miss. Also triggers on `/learn-this`, "learn this", "remember this", or `/new-rule` to capture new rules, and on detected corrections to previously proposed code.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 13
- Human ReviewProduce a plain-English review of the files you just edited and gate the changes behind an explicit Approve/Undo choice. Use when the Stop hook from the human-review-skill plugin asks for a review (you'll see a prompt referencing an edit log), OR when the developer's most recent message is "1", "2", "approve", or "undo" in reply to a previous review.Votes: 0GitHub stars: 15